Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads) header
Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads) profile picture

Then: Advisor on US Domestic Politics and Congressional Affairs, DK Embassy, Washington DC. Now: US Advisor ☎️ +45 2893 3460

Copenhagen
Joined July 2013
Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)Photo by Mads Dalgaard Madsen (@dalgaard_mads)
På torsdag går det løs med Amerikanske Tilstande 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
7
43
5,781
🚨👀
NEWS: Pete Hegseth tells reporters he will hold a press conference at the Pentagon tomorrow morning.
2
3
55
2,839
Det kan godt gå hen og blive en hæsblæsende uge i Kongressen. Huset samles for første gang siden Midtvejsvalget i morgen mandag.
Every single Dem is going to vote yes now. And House Rs are a bit worried about attendance among their members after their midterm drubbing.
2
1
25
2,854
Hvad i alverden foregår der?!
26
2
143
15,199
Dana White afviser
UFC CEO DANA WHITE DECLINES TRUMP'S OFFER TO BECOME PRESS SECRETARY, SOURCE SAYS -CNN
3
10
1,542
Rep Comer, nuværende formand for House Oversight, er ikke imponeret over Hefseth
Comer is open to getting rid of Hegseth 👇 NN: What do you want to see done with Pete Hegseth? There's a lot of talk about impeaching him. Do you want to see somebody new? COMER: That's gonna be a decision President Trump is going to have to make, but I can tell you that there's a lot of questions about Hegseth. We have no idea what the strategy is moving forward on Iran
1
1
7
1,507
Stephen Miller ny Chief of Staff. Strap in.
8
1
1
36
3,630
Hegseth med reaktion
Patriots in control.
1
12
1,049
Den rå kalkule er selvfølgelig også, at hvis Hegseth er ude inden jul, kan Trump få presset et alternativ igennem mens R stadig har flertallet. Er det efter jul skal Demokraterne godkende en hvilken som helst kommende forsvarsminister
Virkelig interessant. Noget kunne tyde på, at Republikanerne SELV bringer det første offerlam
4
3
42
3,574
Mads Dalgaard Madsen retweeted
NEW ALL-TIME HIGH: Scott Colom’s odds to win the Mississippi Senate race hit 98%
10
75
12
1,031
35,837
Virkelig interessant. Noget kunne tyde på, at Republikanerne SELV bringer det første offerlam
5
2
1
96
7,344
Trump er videre
As Republicans are grappling with the aftermath of major midterm losses and voter anger, President Trump is talking about how the ballroom will be "the most beautiful in the world."
5
2
39
2,488
På den helt korte bane (næste to måneder) er det all eyes on SCOTUS Republikanerne skal kun bruge simpelt flertal i Senatet til godkendelse. Den har de i to måneder endnu.
4
20
4,233
"The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there."
Første udmelding fra Vance. Han prøver tydeligt at positionere sig i modsætning til Iran krigen 👇
1
14
2,117
Første udmelding fra Vance. Han prøver tydeligt at positionere sig i modsætning til Iran krigen 👇
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
7
1
25
3,537
Ret spektakulært impromptu interview med Trump her 👇
“I don’t want to be just sitting there for two years vetoing everything.” President Donald Trump picked up a call from @DashaBurns on POLITICO Elections Live and talked to us about the blue wave and how he’s willing to work with incoming congressional Democrats.  Watch live now: politi.co/4AgCofb
3
2
36
5,037
Mads Dalgaard Madsen retweeted
Næste gang nogen påstår, at en enkelt stemme fra eller til ikke gør den store forskel, kan du vise dem denne opgørelse fra Mississippi. Knap en million stemmer afgivet, 28 stemmer skiller kandidaterne.
2
10
1,287
Tidl. R Guvernør Ron Desantis tror ikke på R flertal i Senatet for 2032 på baggrund af aftenens resultater
Dems will get 55 Senate seats and 250+ House seats. Looking at the Senate map and considering such a massive House margin, it is very unlikely Republicans will recapture the Congress in 2028. Might not have a shot at Senate control until 2032.
1
22
2,495
“It’s just a point in time”
BAIER: Do you think you're gonna make changes in your cabinet as a result of this election? TRUMP: No, I don't think so. It had nothing to do with my cabinet. It's just a point in time. There was a mood in the air, I guess.
1
2
15
2,296