@decanted_ai

Pavel S — software engineer turned AI implementation consultant. Agents, automation, real business deployments. No hype, just what works

Joined June 2026
Inkling with a 60% hallucination rate—you seriously think this is a good alternative?
1
34
80% automation isn't progress It's a LOSS If you can't automate a process 100%, don't touch it
1
18
So now you're paying for: The human (unchanged) Building the automation Maintaining the automation Triple the cost. Same output
1
1
The rule is simple: if you can't automate a process 100%, don't Let the human keep doing it It'll cost far less than a "partial" automation that just adds another expense line
1
I've seen this pattern for years in automation With AI, it's gotten even worse Here's how it usually plays out
1
You have a manual process Someone says: "inefficient, let's automate it" You spend budget, time, resources. You end up automating 8 out of 10 steps Looks like a win, right?