Vaccines didn't eradicate disease. The only thing they eradicated was herd immunity. The entire goal of the vaccine program was to wipe a disease off the planet, to leave no dry grass anywhere for it to catch fire on. That goal failed. Anti-vaxxers didn't start getting loud until about ten years ago, and this program has been failing since long before that, through the 70's, the 80's, the 90's, the 2k's. It never actually worked. Here's what actually used to happen. In America, you'd see something like one case in five hundred thousand, because most people carried lifelong immunity after having the disease once. A community needed enough new children born into it before the disease could circulate again, and when it did, that same community wouldn't see another case for years. That's natural herd immunity, and you cannot replicate it with vaccines, because of primary and secondary vaccine failure. Herd immunity requires lifelong protection, and this product was never capable of providing that. So when these outbreaks hit, the first question has to be who's actually carrying this disease right now, symptomatic or not. Test everyone in the affected areas and find out. If the adults who were vaccinated as children have lost their immunity, that tells you exactly where these outbreaks are coming from. @alixm

Oct 23, 2026 · 12:04 AM UTC

49
387
14
1,259
22,529
RelevantRecentLikes
So audaciously FOS. No wonder people are constantly laughing at you.
1
5
177
🐂💩 We didn't have stable herd immunity for most vaccine preventable diseases prior to the availability of vaccines. There are no documented historical examples where true, population-wide herd immunity was permanently achieved and maintained solely through natural infection.
5
3
153
@delbigtree would you be interested in having a seminar at a local Amish community talking about the dangers in vaccines, this younger generation is starting to buy into the big pharma scam.....it is sad to see. I can get it setup.
3
107
Hear much about polio these days ?
1
1
47
What a nonsense. Please stop spreading misinformation. 😢😢
5
89
The review examines how subtle geometric distortions introduced during vaccine manufacturing, such as cross‑linking, folding shifts, or glycan alterations, may influence how the immune system is trained. The central idea is straightforward: the immune system learns from the geometry and dynamics of the antigen it encounters, and even small deviations from the natural structure can shape immune responses in meaningful ways. In brief: -Natural infection presents antigens in their native geometric and dynamic context. -Many vaccine platforms, unintentionally, alter that geometry. -These shifts can train the immune system on a slightly modified version of the target. -When the real pathogen appears, the resulting immune response may be less precise or less durable. The paper argues for a neutral, evidence‑based principle: prioritizing fidelity to native antigen structures may support broader, stronger, and longer‑lasting immunity. This is not a critique of existing vaccines, nor an endorsement of any particular platform. Rather, it is an invitation to consider how geometric fidelity could complement ongoing efforts to improve vaccine performance, especially as pathogens evolve and as research continues to explore new viral and immunological landscapes. The article is fully open access and may be useful to: -Researchers and developers working on next‑generation vaccine platforms -Public health professionals interested in factors influencing immune durability -Anyone examining how manufacturing choices shape immunogenicity and real‑world effectiveness doi.org/10.1080/21645515.202…
1
41
Replying to @sayerjigmi
The vaccine did not fail. Mechanistically, it could ONLY provide systemic immunity, like so many other IM injections against respiratory pathogens. The protection it can't provide, but is assumed, is the protection of mucosal surfaces in the respiratory tract. This can be measured by determining sIgA content in sputum and cellular responses. Practically no studies attempt to do this. This implies that the authors are not familiar with the concept of mucosal immunity. All the vaccine does is reduce the systemic symptoms, which in some cases can be life-saving. Natural mucosal immunity provides BOTH systemic and mucosal immunity. nitter.cf/GauteNilsen/status/209…
1
139
Immunization reduced incidence to nearly zero. So without vaccination, very little exposure to drive herd immunity. So yes, non-vaccinated immunity dropped, no kidding. Silly arguement and results in saying, no kidding!! Really, that is the best you can do? Uffda, eh
1
1
5
171
Del Bigscam, always scamming. Spreading utter nonsense, per usual.
2
5
97
Certainly true of Measles. We traded in Herd Immunity for Vaccines. True of most vaccines. We replaced robust natural herd immunity with a fragile, coverage-and-durability-dependent vaccine immunity. Chickenpox Polio Rubella Mumps Pertussis Diphtheria
3
1
4
132
What's the human (and economic) cost of herd immunity by natural means, Del?
3
96
There’s really nothing funnier than a complete uneducated moron trying to talk with authority over a subject he has no grasp of, where the stupid fail to realize just how stupid they are.
1
2
39
did you do your "research" at a seminar in how to sell supplements
3
88
Del. You could be #vaccinated against a disease that makes you very sick or even kills you. Del. Your own children are wide open to this. Del. This is what ordinary people call common sense. For you it’s high science. Viruses still get people. #vaccines killed smallpox.
1
1
1
76
Just go to any older cemetery and check out the number of graves of children before vaccines. It is sad that herd immunity comes at the expense of so many deaths before vaccines.
1
1
48
It's almost as if he knows nothing about what he's talking about ...
1
29
Uh, smallpox? And got pretty close with polio until the lunatics screwed it up.
1
12
All immunity is natural immunity (unless the immunity is produced via artificial cells). You mean vaccine-induced immunity VS virus-induced immunity or exposure-induced immunity.
23
There aren't any outbreaks. They are using the fraudulent PCR tests again just like covid.
1
44
a) the point of vaccines is a combination of individual protection and herd immunity b) the only human disease we've wiped out is Smallpox where vaccines played a huge part c) we were close to eliminating polio but events cut vaccination rates in pakistan and afghanistan (ctd)
2
100
Complete crap. There's nothing to be 'immune' to. Vaccines are all utterly pointless, fraudulent inventions based on something never proven to exist outside of a laboratory computer. And you certainly don't protect people by injecting then with toxic crap.
2
66
that is stupid. Vaccines are required for herd immunity. you lack scientific acumen. and fool people.
9
73
Proper plumbing eradicated disease
1
5
69
You’re a fucking idiot. Grifting piece of shit.
1
8
fella over here thinks he's a cow lol
1
52
THERES NO SUCH THING AS HERD IMMUNITY.OYR IMMUNE SYSTEMS DON'T WORK THAT WAY. THAT'S LIKE DO IT FOR GRAMMA. BS. BABIES COME HERE ROBUST, THEN THESE NITWITS LET A STRANGER TAKE THEM, GET A HEP B SHOT. 98% A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEAS VITAMIN K, MORE BS. PPL ARE UNAWARE
1
8