delrow retweeted
Replying to @jaxbeachmarsh
Right and in 2026 Elon used his untraceable Starlink to facilitate Russian hacking? Zelensky blew up their shit and that’s why Trump/Musk retaliated by limiting Ukraine’s Starshield service?
delrow retweeted
Everyone should offer Marc huge thank yous!
He’s a godsend!
delrow retweeted
It shows you what is priorities are! It’s all about himself, not about what’s good for the American citizens. 🤬
delrow retweeted
And what would a Wednesday be without a #WellerWednesday song?
🇬🇧
🎶
🎸
🎹
@paulwellerHQ
delrow retweeted
this soundtrack of countless first wedding dances is ironically about unattainable love 🤨
Paul Weller - You Do Something To Me
(Hyde Park 2002) ▶️
#WellerWednesday
delrow retweeted
Must-read @DevlinBarrett survey of the handful of U.S. attorneys across the country who are most vigorously pursuing Trump's political agenda.
nytimes.com/2026/10/28/us/po…
delrow retweeted
You're telling me the President owns up to $23.1 million of Chevron
AND up to $18.4 million of Exxon
AND gas is up 40% in a year
AND his trades show up weeks after he makes them
AND the House voted to ban itself from trading stocks, but the bill doesn't cover him
And we're the ones who get banned for posting it.
delrow retweeted
Today we’re releasing our tally of corruption in Trump’s Washington.
$377 billion. And that’s just what you can see.
The documentary & data are now LIVE at CORRUPTIONLAND.org
delrow retweeted
Allow me to put the vile Vivek Ramaswamy ad into perspective.
This is Mike Caruso, GOP politician in Florida. He was arrested for molesting his grandson. He stuck his penis in his 3 year old grandson’s mouth and urinated.
Vivek and JD Vance support Mike Caruso.
delrow retweeted
It was an open secret that Donald Trump and his mentor Roy Cohn were lovers.
Cohn died of AIDS shortly after Trump found out.
delrow retweeted
To Brian Moynihan, the Board of Directors, and the executives who run anti money laundering compliance at Bank of America @BankofAmerica:
You are not our bank. We are your supply.
Every dollar you lend, every point of interest you earn, every one of the $27 billion in profit you report each year begins as a deposit from an American family. You need us far more than we need you. I am writing to make sure every one of those families understands that, and to tell you what happens next.
My name is Everett Stern. I am the @HSBC whistleblower. Fourteen years ago I gave up my career and risked my life to hand the United States government evidence of a bank moving money for cartels, terrorists, and sanctioned regimes. I did it in defense of this country. I am doing it again now.
To the American people reading this, here is the situation in plain language.
Every bank in America is required by law to stop money that belongs to drug cartels, terrorists, and sanctioned regimes. That is not paperwork. It is the wall between the people who want to kill Americans and the dollars they need to do it. On October 13, @USTreasury announced that at Bank of America, that wall came down. The bank did not deny it. In its own resolution with @FinCENnews, Bank of America admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Willful means it was not a mistake. Decisions were made, and the money moved.
Here is what Treasury says moved. More than $5 billion in suspicious transactions that were never reported on time, over $1 billion of it tied to national security risks. Trillions of dollars that the bank’s monitoring system failed to properly watch at all. Transactions showing the fingerprints of Chinese money laundering networks. Trade-based laundering with a substantial nexus to the southwest border. Customers flagged for narcotics proceeds whose red flags sat unaddressed. And 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Belarus, Iran, Burma, Somalia, and global terrorism programs, including payments routed through blocked banks and designated individuals allowed to transact because the alerts were not calibrated to catch them. Regulators ordered the bank to fix this in December 2024. More than a year later, Treasury says, it still was not escalating suspicious activity.
The price for all of that was $1.2 billion. Two weeks of profit. If a working family paid two weeks of income for helping move money for sanctioned regimes, we would call it an outrage. When America’s bank does it, we call it a settlement.
@SecScottBessent said it himself when he announced the penalty: even the biggest financial institutions are not above the law. I agree with him. I am writing to find out whether he means it, and whether you do.
Not one person has been charged. Not one.
I am working with community leaders in Washington. Republicans and Democrats are standing behind this, because national security does not have a party. Millions of Americans have read my letters to Treasury in the past week. I am pressing Secretary Bessent to refer your board and your AML leadership to the @DOJCrimDiv for criminal prosecution, and I am calling on FBI Director @FBIDirectorKash to open the investigation that should have begun the day you admitted it.
To the leadership of Bank of America, the American people have three questions, and I am asking them on their behalf.
After your bank admitted to the government that it willfully broke the law, did one executive lose his job for it? Name him.
Treasury says your program failed on staffing, training, monitoring, and audit, all at once. Tell the public what you rebuilt. Not what you spent. What you changed.
Was anyone at Bank of America held personally responsible for what you admitted, or did the institution absorb it like a bad quarter?
The American people are waiting for your answers. So am I.
And if those answers do not come, Americans are prepared to respond accordingly, lawfully and peacefully, and in the one language a bank understands. Americans will take their deposits to community banks, credit unions, and regional banks that have never needed a billion-dollar settlement to learn the difference between a customer and a cartel. Americans will stand outside your branches, within the law, and say so. And I will be there with them.
This is not a boycott. It is a free market telling a bank what it thinks of blood money.
Because that is what this is. Every terrorist attack begins with a wire transfer. Every overdose of an American son or daughter starts at a bank where someone cleared an alert they should not have cleared. No settlement washes that off.
The news cycle is not going to save you. The American people are not going to forget. And too big to jail ends here.
Everett Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder / Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
delrow retweeted
The Florida Republicans don't want you to see this.
You definitely should watch.
delrow retweeted
Occupy Democrats
2͏h͏ ·
BREAKING: PANIC! Trump is DESPERATELY trying to stop Jack Smith from testifying in his own $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC.
Donald Trump sued the BBC for defamation, asking for a whopping $10 billion in damages. Now, he’s panicking about the one witness who might actually know something about the behavior that led the British broadcaster to publish what it did.
According to The New Republic, the BBC subpoenaed former special counsel Jack Smith to testify as part of its defense against Trump’s defamation suit. The suit claims the network defamed him with deceptive editing in a 2024 documentary about the January 6 Capitol attack.
Trump’s lawyers filed a motion Friday to block the deposition, arguing that “Smith lacks any personal knowledge regarding the issues in this matter.”
Their reasoning: Smith wasn’t at the January 6 speech, didn’t help prepare it, and can’t know what Trump was thinking. They say anything he gathered was “secondhand knowledge” from materials collected from other sources.
The BBC’s lawyers weren’t impressed. They wrote that “none of [Trump]’s arguments for blocking the deposition of Mr. Smith can withstand scrutiny.” They noted that Smith himself doesn’t object to testifying, and that Trump still has to prove he “did not foment or incite the January 6 Capitol riot,” which he claims the documentary falsely implied.
Then came the line that says it all: “No one forced Plaintiff to file this lawsuit and to dispute that his speech on January 6 incited the violence that followed at the Capitol. But as long as he chooses to maintain the case, he cannot commit the fundamental injustice of preventing the BBC from obtaining the evidence it needs to robustly defend itself.”
This isn’t Trump’s only dodge. His attorneys are also fighting efforts to make Trump himself testify, to subpoena his children, and to look into his finances. Trump sued over what the BBC said about January 6, and now he’s fighting every attempt to examine what actually happened.
There’s another problem for him. The BBC is funded by British taxpayers, so Trump can’t bully it into a hefty settlement or force it to back off its coverage the way he has with some American media companies.
So now he has two choices: drop the case, or actually try to prove his point and live with the consequences.
If Trump really believes he did nothing wrong on January 6, a deposition should be no problem. His lawyers’ desperation suggests otherwise.
Please like and share if you can’t wait to hear what Jack Smith has to say if the BBC successfully gets him to testify!
delrow retweeted
Honestly, I don't give a fuck if they suspend my account further.
Elon Musk is a war criminal & a Russian asset.
He's a Nazi & a fucking traitor.
Elon Musk couldn't be an American patriot or a decent person if he tried for 600 years.
Fuck that stupid bitch.
delrow retweeted
Now a lot of people say Trump is just like Richard Nixon,...
... but I think they're OPPOSITES.
Nixon was a politician who became a criminal. Trump was a criminal who became a politician.
And with Nixon,... you COULD see his taxes,... but you COULDN'T see his wife naked.
delrow retweeted
In a world of red hat wearers, be the Primus tee shirt lady 🤘 #StillPunkRock #GenXAF #fuckdonaldtrump #releasetheepsteinfiles































