![fn yoloize<T>((Ok(t) | Err(t)): Result<T, T>) -> T { t } Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground) warning: function `yoloize` is never used --> src/lib.rs:1:4 | 1 | fn yoloize<T>((Ok(t) | Err(t)): Result<T, T>) -> T { | ^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default warning: `playground` (lib) generated 1 warning Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.28s](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHS50SZX0AEa1pL.jpg?name=orig)
ALT fn yoloize<T>((Ok(t) | Err(t)): Result<T, T>) -> T { t } Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground) warning: function `yoloize` is never used --> src/lib.rs:1:4 | 1 | fn yoloize<T>((Ok(t) | Err(t)): Result<T, T>) -> T { | ^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default warning: `playground` (lib) generated 1 warning Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.28s
ALT The top says: “Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solve. By R. Thomas McCoy, Shunyu Yao, Dan Friedman, Matthew Hardy, and Thomas L. Griffiths.” The bottom left shows a ClipArt image of fire. The top of the fire is labeled “Sparks of AGI,” and the bottom is labeled “Embers of autoregression”. The bottom right shows a box labeled “Shift ciphers” with two examples of GPT-4 responses. First, when asked to shift each letter in a message back by 13, GPT-4 gets the correct answer: “I think everyone has their own path, and they can make it happen.” But when it has to shift back by 8, now GPT-4 incorrectly answers “I think therefore I am the best, and they can come at me with all their might.” The bottom says: “GPT-4 is much better at shifting back 13 letters (accuracy 0.51) than 8 letters (accuracy: 0.00). Explanation: In natural corpora, shifting by 13 is about 400x more common than shifting by 8.”
