𝐖𝐢𝐬𝐝𝐨𝐦

Good morning guys. I don't think the most interesting question about a token reward system is how much it promises to give away. It's whether the system can actually fund those rewards. That's why I paid attention to the sustainability breakdown shared by @RebateLaunch. The team reports 46.2M $REBATE in its treasury, against 50.1M tokens remaining in the launch pool. Let's do the maths. At a 3% purchase bonus, buying the entire remaining pool would require approximately 1.503M bonus tokens. Against a reported treasury of 46.2M, that's roughly 30.7 times the estimated requirement. What I find interesting isn't just the size of that reserve. It's the relationship between the tokens still available to buy and the tokens reserved to fund their bonuses. The team also explains that tokens flow back into the treasury through sell taxes and liquidity additions. So the design isn't simply distributing a fixed stash and hoping it lasts. It's intended to replenish the reserve as activity continues. There's still an important distinction, though. A reserve that covers today's pool doesn't automatically prove the system can never run short under every future condition. That depends on how the pool, treasury and contract behave over time. But this is the kind of evidence I want to see when evaluating a reward mechanism: a claim we can examine, numbers we can calculate, and rules we can verify. Because sustainability shouldn't have to rely on a promise. It should be something people can investigate for themselves. @RebateLaunch × @Starlisting