David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle) header
David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle) profile picture

I use X to connect with amazing people and learn about extraordinary ideas: collective intelligence, generative AI, quantum computing, lunar settlement.

Boston, MA
Joined May 2008
Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)Photo by David Koelle 🌳 (@dmkoelle)
A tree 🌳 in your profile name indicates that you are honest, open-minded, agreeable, and interested in contributing to the mesh of ideas and principles that build us as a collective humanity. (Lack of a tree 🌳 does not imply the opposite.)
1
3
166
p(bloom) > p(doom)
If you’re a developer and you’re not sufficiently AI-pilled yet, you need to watch this. There is still a need for developers. AI is a higher-level programming abstraction. You still need to build amazing things to solve real needs and build new ideas. youtu.be/vDjW_dRyKXY
2
83
If you’re a developer and you’re not sufficiently AI-pilled yet, you need to watch this. There is still a need for developers. AI is a higher-level programming abstraction. You still need to build amazing things to solve real needs and build new ideas. youtu.be/vDjW_dRyKXY
1
1
154
If you all think that AI is the end of programming, then who’s making the next versions of, and the ideas for new kinds of, core libraries and languages that you and AI depend on? (Answer: it’s YOU, human developers, with your AI tools)
44
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
A hopeful thought: Literary science fiction might eventually grow out of its current doom and gloom phase and return to a more optimistic approach reminiscent of the Golden Age texts since culture often acts like a pendulum, swinging one way then the other.
1
1
5
214
Well worth a watch!
Let's fix 3 major brands. Which is your favorite fix? Disney+, 47 Brand or Kind? Which major logo should I fix next?
1
119
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
Anyone else following the DARPA Lift Challenge? $6.5M in prize money to build a drone that can: - Stay under 55 lbs - Take off with a 110 lb minimum payload (4x its weight) - Fly 4 nautical miles loaded (12 laps) - Drop the payload - Fly 1 more nautical mile empty (3 laps) - Finish inside a 30-min window Top 3 teams split the full prize as long as they clear the 4:1 ratio. Most heavy-lift drones can barely lift their own weight. DARPA wants 4x. That's never been done.
454
671
149
13,204
2,489,246
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
It's done. After years of work, Logic Islands: Deduction Game is live on iOS and Android. In an age of vibe coding and endless promises that you can build something in a weekend so you never have to think again, we did the dumbest possible thing. We took years to make something for actual human beings, to help them think more, not less. Every puzzle is made by hand and by obsession. I have been designing them for close to 15 years, slowly refining down to the core few hundreds that truly work, testing them on real people of every background and trashing the thousands that didn't make the cut. Each puzzle has solution walk-through explanations that we wrote by hand, on paper and whiteboards, then sat with players to see what landed and what didn't. Sometimes the most elegant (mathematically) solution wasn't the most illuminating, so we adapted. Some single explanations for one puzzle took days to pitch just right. 10 years ago I had notebooks full with ideas and puzzles for this game. I always had a lot going on, and I wasn't an app developer, so it felt too daunting. But I knew deep in my bones that it had to exist, and that I was built to make it, so it was only a matter of time. After getting hooked on the puzzles herself, my wife @NadiaGasmi convinced me we should build it together and build the version that gets it to the most people possible. 18 months ago, when she quit her job as a neuroscientist at the Cleveland Clinic to go all in with me, I knew it was really happening. I have always believed that one of the clearest marks of a good game (a game being just "voluntary attempts to overcome unnecessary obstacles") is that it resonates with people of wildly different backgrounds and ages. In early testing, in a given day: lawyers and engineers would ask if they could get their friends an invite, since they were hooked and wanted to share it; my (precocious) 10-year old niece would steal her dad's phone every morning and make him late to work because she wouldn't stop playing; and a few of my math PhD colleagues asked me to write papers about some of the stranger puzzles I was testing. This range of reaction, from such different people, gave us huge boosts and extra courage when we needed it. It was brutal at times. I had to keep working my 9-5 as well to keep the lights on while we built this, so I learned to love the evenings and weekends hammering away at it. Since I work largely on AI and math by day, it was interesting and refreshing to work on (what I came to see as) the opposite of AI by night. Especially now, when nearly everyone is claiming they can build something, without thinking, that will quietly strip away our ability and our need to think, and when too many people on social media seem bent on contributing to demoralization campaigns even when it doesn't serve them, we believe that a game that truly challenges you and makes you think more while having fun is extremely valuable. We have also watched the backlash as some big-name apps ram ai down their users' throats. So we are glad that we made the call at the start that we wouldn't hand over to ai anything we knew would be better if we did it ourselves, slowly and without shortcuts, every idea tested on real people, even when it cost us a great deal more time, patience, and expertise than we thought we had. Fundamentally, we made this game because it is 2026 and it is time to make the things that you feel in your core that only you can make: the things that must exist because you love them, that you love so much you know you can serve the people who use them for decades, the things that will help people have more fun, think harder, and feel better about the incredible thing it is to be a human being. Now go play. Link just below.
9
23
7
210
49,964
This post will get fewer than 10 views
3
36
Mine asteroids. Extract metals from ores in space. Manufacture in space. Collect limitless solar energy in space. Make Earth a sanctuary for life.
2
30
Shazam but for noises your car makes
27
This is a huge issue (and plenty of people were thinking about it a year ago). We need to put data protection around one’s AI use similar to 5th Amendment or spousal privilege or attorney-client privilege. That’s the spirit of the law. The law needs to catch up to the tech.
Sam Altman reveals a legal problem with ChatGPT that nobody thought about even a year ago "People talk about the most personal things in their lives to ChatGPT. Young people especially use it as a therapist, a life coach" "If you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it. We haven't figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT" "If you go talk to ChatGPT about your most sensitive stuff and then there's a lawsuit, we could be required to produce that. I think that's very screwed up" "We should have the same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that we do with a therapist or a doctor" "No one had to think about that even a year ago. Now I think it's this huge issue"
40
How does an organization keep a wiki well-tended, avoid bit rot, ensure searches return worthwhile material instead of old, outdated stuff?
1
15
The systems engineering V model remains very relevant in the era of LLM coding agents
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
30
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
PICARD: Data, shields up DATA: Brilliant! Shields can reduce damage we sustain. Not immunity. Not hubris. Just prudence. It's not precaution—it's strategy. [camera shakes] WORF: HULL BREACHES ON NINE DECKS DATA: Here's what happened: you told me to raise shields, and I didn't
295
4,734
178
49,466
1,406,856
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
A snapshot of the molecular machines that enable thought
20
72
3
574
29,418
[bill hader character eating popcorn.gif]
88
David Koelle 🌳 retweeted
the craziest part now is that the modern computer probably has to be entirely reinvented, from scratch. pretty much like how jobs & co brought apple ii to market. like not improved. not given a chatbot sidebar or something but really from the ground up like the iphone redefined what it meant to be a pocket computer. the current paradigm for computers was built around a human staring at a screen, moving a cursor, opening apps, managing windows, naming files, remembering where things live, & manually translating intent into interface actions. that made sense when the human was the runtime. but in an ai native world, it starts to look kinda ridiculous. you can see this ridiculousness when you use computer use agents… they are useful sure, but they’re also obviously transitional. they’re teaching ai to operate machines designed for humans, which is clever, but also kind of absurd. it’s like making a robot hand so it can use a doorknob instead of asking why the door needs a knob at all. yes i know humans also need to use a door knob, but maybe in the future humans don’t need to use a computer, or at least what we think of a computer today at all. this all leads to some interesting questions: - what is a file when the system understands context? - what is an app when intent can route itself? - what is a desktop when work can be decomposed, executed, monitored, & summarized by agents? - what is a browser when the agent can retrieve, compare, transact, & remember? - what is an operating system when the primary user is no longer just a person, but a person plus a swarm of delegated intelligences? or no person at all. the old computer assumed navigation. the new computer has to assume a new kind of intention. the old computer organized information. the new computer has to try to organize agency. we’re still in the hacky middle stage at the moment with sidebars, copilots, agents clicking through legacy ui, & automation layers sitting on top of 40 year old metaphors. the new computer is likely one where memory, context, identity, permissions, tools, agents, & interfaces are native primitives. this means desktop, mobile, browser, apps, files, folders deserves another first principles look.
368
678
166
6,809
624,639
Interested in AI/LLMs? You should know about @fairlytrained which certifies fair training data use in Generative AI -- making sure humans creators are treated fairly with respect to the data that they have produced. Lots of music-related AI in their list of certified models.
28
Will experts publish LLM skills instead of or in addition to books? Today, you might create your own agent that has the knowledge of an expert or a resource like HBR. We read these books to become more knowledgeable and, ideally, to implant new techniques into our routines.
37
LLMs might have killed StackOverflow, but the other StackExchange sites - Worldbuilding, Mathematics, Arqade, and more - are still fire
32