Kritisk tænkning, økomodernisme og hvad der sker med viden når det rammer det offentlige rum, er nogle af mine interesser. Er med i WePlanet Danmark.

København, Danmark
Joined June 2015
Wollen die Grünen etwa keine öffentliche Debatte? Die Grünen in der Schweiz (@GrueneCH) canceln lieber eine Mutter & Biologin und Mitglied der Grünen als öffentlich und ehrlich über Kernenergie zu diskutieren. Wenn ihr das auch schwach von den Grünen findet, teilt das Video und markiert Sie fleißig. #Kernenergie #Schweiz #Grüne #Cancleculture
This week, WePlanet’s Tea Törmänen is in Baden for discussions on Switzerland’s nuclear future as the country heads towards a referendum on whether to allow new nuclear power plants. Tea was also due to debate nuclear energy with the Swiss Green Party — but they pulled out of the discussion. In June, Switzerland's Parliament voted to lift the country’s ban on building new nuclear power plants. More than 125,000 signatures have now been collected to force a referendum — meaning Swiss voters are expected to have the final say in February 2027. The question is whether Switzerland should once again allow new nuclear infrastructure as part of its long-term energy system. In this video, Tea explains some of the many environmental advantages to nuclear energy and why we should embrace the power generation in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss. #WePlanet #NuclearEnergy #Switzerland #CleanEnergy
3
11
224
Fun fact: Sweden has four nuclear reactors that have each generated more electricity than all Danish wind turbines ever. Forsmark 3 and Oskarshamn 3 started in 1985, the year Denmark banned nuclear. Both still ahead of Denmark’s entire wind fleet.
62
500
41
2,817
205,719
Søren A retweeted
This week, WePlanet’s Tea Törmänen is in Baden for discussions on Switzerland’s nuclear future as the country heads towards a referendum on whether to allow new nuclear power plants. Tea was also due to debate nuclear energy with the Swiss Green Party — but they pulled out of the discussion. In June, Switzerland's Parliament voted to lift the country’s ban on building new nuclear power plants. More than 125,000 signatures have now been collected to force a referendum — meaning Swiss voters are expected to have the final say in February 2027. The question is whether Switzerland should once again allow new nuclear infrastructure as part of its long-term energy system. In this video, Tea explains some of the many environmental advantages to nuclear energy and why we should embrace the power generation in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss. #WePlanet #NuclearEnergy #Switzerland #CleanEnergy
3
11
1
32
838
Energinets “Redegørelse for elforsyningssikkerhed 2026” forventer en stigende risiko for strømmangel. Citat: “Der er tale om en fælleseuropæisk risiko, hvorfor Danmark ikke i samme omfang som hidtil kan lade effekttilstrækkeligheden i knaphedssituationer bero på import.”
6
4
34
1,342
Beef production has been the largest driver of deforestation this century. Over the last two decades, around 128 million hectares of forest have been cleared to make way for agriculture and forest plantations. That’s an area five times the size of the United Kingdom. What has driven this deforestation? A recent paper estimated the contribution of different agricultural products over the last few decades. In the chart, you can see the breakdown. Beef production has been the largest driver by far, contributing over 40% of the total. This has mostly been the clearing of forest for grazing pasture, especially across Brazil and other countries in Latin America. Oilseeds — mostly soy and oil palm — were the second-largest driver, again concentrated in Latin America for soy and in Indonesia and Malaysia for palm oil. While deforestation for palm oil was high in the early 2000s and 2010s, it has fallen a lot in recent years. Forest plantations have been a large driver of deforestation in North America and East Asia. Deforestation for most other products — including cereals, roots and tubers, and cash crops like cocoa and coffee — has been concentrated in Africa, where yields have not grown quickly enough to offset rising demand. (written by @_HannahRitchie)
30
376
38
733
54,508
EU Chief puts nuclear and renewables side by side 🤝 Nuclear energy was placed directly alongside renewables in Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the Union address this week. "When Russia cut us off the gas, we fought back. Our supplies are now more diversified. We insvested in our homegrown clean energies, and this is renewables and nuclear.", said Von der Leyen in her speech. Von der Leyen then called for Europe to double down on affordable and homegrown clean energy being renewables and nuclear adding “Technologically neutral.” as the basis. For context nuclear energy produced around 651 TWh in the EU last year corresponding to 23.2% of all electricity generation in the EU. On an individual technology basis, nuclear remained the largest source of EU electricity, ahead of natural gas and wind. At the same time, gas-fired generation increased by 8.6% in 2025 as hydro and wind generation fell. The European Commission's own final Nuclear Illustrative Programme (PINC) now estimates that around €241 billion in the base case will be invested in lifetime extensions and new reactors by 2050. EU nuclear capacity may increase from around 98 GW today to roughly 144 GW by 2050, with further investment expected in SMRs and advanced reactors.
13
30
10
121
10,972
Søren A retweeted
ELECTRIFICATION: Really striking chart showing that three-quarters of final energy demand can now be electrified "economically" (ie at lower lifetime cost) – and 90% electrification is technically possible
25
220
27
878
39,152
It's true, climate change will not eliminate the human race. Congratulations if you've figured that out. Have you also figured out that climate change will do a ton of damage, and that the more we can reduce emissions the less damage it will do?
62
23
3
211
10,111
Søren A retweeted
Tell the UK Government: Defend bluefin tuna! Sign the petition below. Join George Monbiot and Mark Lynas in an adventure to the south coast of England to go bluefin tuna watching. These magnificent animals, with bullet-shaped bodies and luminescent colours, will chase smaller fish to the ocean surface and leap out of the waters, much like dolphins. In this video, George and Mark discuss how Atlantic bluefin tuna were fished to near-extinction in the 1960's — but now, in a wonderful win for nature, the fish are finally making a recovery in British waters. However, what does the UK government do in response to the bluefin tuna bounce back? Instead of implementing measures to support their continued recovery, the government has approved more industrial fishing permits. In fact, the environment ministry has doubled the number of commercial fishing permits this year. This cannot stand. Bluefin tuna must be allowed to fully bounce back. Join WePlanet in calling on the British government to say NO to commercial fishing and instead protect the bluefin tuna. Our communities want bluefin protected, not killed. Sign the petition to protect bluefin tuna here: act.weplanet.org/p/defend-bl…
2
31
2
27
488
Søren A retweeted
Ana Rodrigues, a Senior Campaigner with WePlanet, sat down with Foro Nuclear to discuss nuclear energy advocacy in Spain. Ana — "Young climate advocates understand that the problem is not nuclear energy but fossil fuels. The environmental movement itself is also becoming more diverse. Although some organisations remain opposed to nuclear energy, a growing number of scientists, conservationists and climate advocates support a more pragmatic approach that combines renewables, nuclear energy, energy storage and other clean technologies. At WePlanet, we are proud to be part of that evolution. We believe environmentalism should never be tied to an ideology; it must evolve as scientific knowledge evolves." Read the full interview foronuclear.org/en/sector-va… #NuclearEnergy #Advocacy #CleanEnergy
1
1
9
267
Søren A retweeted
We made this video a couple of years ago and I think it's still the best summary of how ocean plastic pollution works. Key points: - <0.1% of plastic waste actually makes it to the ocean. Ocean plastic pollution is a leakage problem. - 1% of rivers contribute roughly 80% of plastic inflow. - Most of these rivers are in coastal cities in middle-income countries, where people now have enough wealth but no adequate waste collection infrastructure. - High-income countries barely contribute to the problem. OECD countries consume 1/3 of all plastic but are responsible for <0.5% of ocean inflow. If you live in a rich country and don’t litter, your contribution to the problem is basically 0. - Nearshore and offshore plastic pollution are very different. Nearshore plastic pollution mostly originates from rivers and is not very persistent; after leaving river mouths, plastic tends to drift around for weeks to months before washing up on a coastline. Plastic in the offshore gyres mostly originates from the fishing industry and is very persistent; it is trapped indefinitely because there are hardly any coastlines in these currents to ‘catch’ this waste. This is why our catch from our Interceptors and our ocean cleanup system looks totally different.
27
169
14
844
36,936
Værd at læse
One of the biggest critiques (and fears) of nuclear energy is the question: “But what about the waste?” This question — while an important one — is also widely misunderstood. Yes, nuclear energy produces radioactive waste. No, it is not the danger you think it is. In this explainer, we break down some of the misconceptions about spent nuclear fuel — and why we should all support nuclear energy as a tool to tackle the climate crisis. Read the full story on Instagram. #NuclearPower #CleanEnergy
1
46
The math isn't mathing.  The world spends more than three times as much on fossil fuel subsidies as it would cost to transition to clean economies for a safe climate and air.  The solutions are ready and the money is there. What’s needed now is action at scale.  Here’s how: bit.ly/3UFnsYq #CleanAirDay
88
463
53
781
45,511
Søren A retweeted
Schrödinger's capacity factor: Baseload nuclear is inflexible, but baseload solar and batteries are reliable. Refueling and unscheduled maintenance make nuclear intermittent (and that's bad) while nighttime makes solar intermittent (and that's good).
Can we finally stop pretending nuclear is "unreliable" because of droughts and heatwaves? New study: across 500+ reactor-years in Europe, heat & drought reduced output by just 0.6% (max 1.3% in any country). That's peanuts. Solar and wind are FAR more weather-dependent and thus less reliable year-round, even during droughts. Heatwaves often bring still air, so low wind is common exactly when it's hottest. Nuclear's capacity factor is ~90.9%, way steadier. And the fixes work: French river-fleet heat losses dropped 91% (5.5→0.5 TWh) since 2003 through cooling upgrades. (Voor @MelissaDepr, dat is precies het punt dat ik eerder maakte.) sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
3
14
1
55
2,681
It would have been good timing for a planet-cooling volcanic eruption that would have suppressed what are going to be exceptional levels of global warming next year...
The eruption of Anak Krakatau in Indonesia 🌋 Preliminary estimates suggest some sulfur dioxide reached the upper atmosphere — but only a tiny fraction of the amount released by Mount Pinatubo in 1991, which temporarily cooled the planet.
34
34
12
1,062
271,790
57
1,718
25
29,276
709,341
Søren A retweeted
2019 vs 2026 Everyone, eventually, acknowledges that adaptation is climate action.
7
7
3
66
5,775
Søren A retweeted
This is the story of how — by using the power of precision fermentation — scientists were able to prevent the slaughter of 7.5 billion pigs a year for the production of insulin, and instead, create the medicine in labs around the world. In our latest video, WePlanet's @Joelscotthalkes explains the power of microorganisms and how precision fermentation can be used for everything — from the medicine we use to the food we eat. Watch ⬇️ #PrecisionFermentation #Insulin #RebootFood
2
10
1
22
870
Søren A retweeted
Jonathan Symons — Director of Research and Innovation, School of International Studies at Macquarie University, and a member of @WePlanetAus — co-authored this story about an emerging topic referred to as solar radiation management (SRM). As the @UNEP announced this week that overshooting 1.5 degrees of warming is "inevitable," SRM — also referred to as climate stabilisation — could be our last bet to stop our planet's accelerating heating crisis. The problem is that SRM remains something of a taboo in polite climate circles, so much that the UNEP report completely ignores it. There is emerging evidence that SRM could be the only thing standing between us and planetary tipping points, such as the total loss of Arctic sea ice, the loss of the Amazon rainforest, the collapse of the AMOC current, and widespread coral reef loss. Yet despite this, there are many who are trying to maintain the taboo — even if this prevents us from using a tool that might save the planet from rapid climate collapse. For us at WePlanet, we believe scientific knowledge is always a good thing, and that decisions made in the light of knowledge are better than those made in ignorance. We defend research, and believe we need more research so we can better understand the risks and potential of SRM — urgently. Read the full story here ➡️ shorturl.at/PBVnj #WePlanet #SolarRadiationManagement #ClimateCrisis
1
2
14
460
Søren A retweeted
Have had 15 years to get their facts straight.
The Guardian's depiction of radioactive waste management has no bearing in reality. If the truck is transporting spent nuclear fuel, its not green, it wouldn't glow and it certainly wouldn't be exposed to the elements. Also, nuclear waste 'dumps' don't exist. Radioactive waste is managed in some of the most overengineered, secure facilities you could imagine. I look forward to the 'cartoon' defence.
2
8
1
48
984