Dylan W.

Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.

🔴 🇫🇷 ALERTE INFO - DU JAMAIS VU: UNE TAXE SUR CHAQUE GIGAOCTET INTERNET VOTÉE À L’ASSEMBLÉE Les députés ont adopté un amendement prévoyant de taxer les producteurs de données numériques à hauteur de 5,5 centimes par Go transmis. 💰 Objectif affiché : jusqu’à 10 milliards d’euros par an. Netflix, YouTube, cloud, jeux dématérialisés… les grands services numériques pourraient être concernés, avec un risque de répercussion sur les prix pour les consommateurs. 📌 Source : Assemblée nationale #France #Budget2027

🚨 HISTORIQUE ! LE GÉANT APPLE DÉVOILE LE PREMIER MACBOOK DE L’HISTOIRE AVEC UN ÉCRAN TACTILE OLED 😱 💵 À partir de 3299€ 🖥️ Écran tactile OLED, 120 Hz et luminosité extrême 🚀 Puces M5 Pro et M5 Max, jusqu’à 128 Go de RAM et 16 To de stockage ⚖️ Design plus fin, plus léger et plus élégant 🔋 Jusqu’à 24 h d’autonomie et 50 % de recharge en 20 min 🔊 Son amélioré avec 6 haut-parleurs

I’ve been keeping this a secret for a while, but earlier this year I made one of the biggest bets of my career & this time it's not in Silicon Valley or New York. It's in Almaty, Kazakhstan. I'm proud to officially announce that I'm an investor & advisor to @higgsfield

once ASI is here and living somewhere because of "work" becomes pointless, people with money will just move to the nicest places on earth Mediterranean climate, ocean, mountains, good food, beautiful isolated towns places like this are going to become insanely valuable probably worth buying real estate there now

Si vous êtes designer LANCEZ VOS PROPRES TOOLS/SAAS Oui les projets client c’est bien, et il faut les garder pour: — S’améliorer continuellement — Découvrir de nouvelles niches/idées — Faire du réseau — Avoir du cashflow Notre avantage principal c’est d’être entre les marketeux et les développeurs On sait créer des sites qui convertissent On sait diminuer le churn On sait augmenter la LTV Oui, on peut avoir un lifestyle plus que plaisant avec des projets clients Mais gardez quelques heures dans la journée pour kiffer sur quelques designs de projet perso + créez une communauté Puis un jour… Associez vous au % avec des devs et lancez vos idées quasi sans capital Au pire des cas: — Expérience d’avoir lancé un SaaS — Revente facile sur acquire — Build in Public = Leads Bref ne vous limitez pas à l’étiquette de designer, on est tous capables de bien plus.

I am confident there will be as many designers replaced as developers. At the very least. If we look at the numbers, 90%+ of designers have not done any interesting work, they existed because they were able to execute based on design systems. We needed them because they knew how to use complex apps and because they had some basic understanding of design rules. The same goes for developers, the vast majority of developers existed because we needed them to write boring code to get something that is 100% figured out to work properly. There was nothing else asked of them. They are a means to an end the same way most designers are a means to an end. There are only three ways now as designer: 1. Double down entirely on your personality, taste, skills and what makes YOU unique to work with (there will be a small percentage who will be able to do this) 2. Acquire new technical skills, take over the role as designer & developer & product person and become useful to an industry that is seeking exactly this type of person. 3. Start dancing on TikTok, YouTube, IG etc.

y’a que les français qui ne comprennent pas l’intérêt de lâcher 50k en design

Get ready.