Fighting the disorder in the system.
Joined October 2020
- Tweets860
- Following169
- Followers9
- Likes1.6K
Pinned Tweet
When trying to figure out my tweets, understand that I disagree with a lot of things on both the right and the left.
How many people in Boston created these accounts?
On America’s 250th birthday, the federal government made $1,000 deposits into millions of investment accounts for toddlers who aren’t even old enough to stay up for fireworks. trib.al/hy9pAAx
So you’re ok with TPS ending once they elect a new president?
Fighting Entropy retweeted
If you say that something is fake, a false flag, a setup, a hoax, a psyop, or staged before you have gathered any evidence and had a chance to analyze it, you’re radicalized, and that radicalization is impacting your ability to assess reality.
Fighting Entropy retweeted
WA state somehow can’t find just $4 million a year to keep the campgrounds open? No way…this is clearly strategic.
Lawmakers are holding our beautiful recreation lands hostage as leverage for their endless tax increases. Pretty gross when you think about it.
Washington state to close multiple campgrounds, slash recreation services amid budget cuts:
komonews.com/news/local/wash…
While uncouth and classically Trumpian, this is probably best regarded as a capsule commentary on those who convinced themselves for several years they were living in the plot of ‘The Manchurian Candidate’.
Pretty wild how the OGs of the immigration restrictionist wing of the GOP - the Tom Tancredos and Steve Kings - who were blackballed in the 2000s for advocating policies that pale in comparison to what’s coming out of the West Wing today have basically been forgotten.
Fighting Entropy retweeted
In a legal first, a jury in New York awarded $2 million in damages to a 22-year-old woman over her gender transition surgery that took place when she was a teenager. The plaintiff accused her psychologist and plastic surgeon of violating standard practices in their fields.
Independent journalist @benryanwriter covered the entire trial and joins CBS News to discuss the landmark verdict.
Fighting Entropy retweeted
If reports are true that Dems are demanding judicial warrants for all ICE arrests as part of DHS funding bill, that will take a massive amount of targets off the board for ICE. They would only be able to go after illegal immigrants who have committed a new *federal* crime *after* entering the U.S. illegally.
State & local crimes would not apply. (Feds don’t enforce state & local).
For instance, if an illegal immigrant gets arrested in Minnesota for a DUI crash causing great bodily injury (state crime) and bonds out of jail, ICE would not be able to target him for arrest because there would be no judicial warrant (not a federal crime).
ICE would not be able to target anyone for just being in the U.S. illegally. They would have to wait for a federal crime to be committed, then a federal judge would have to sign off on probable cause for arrest.
It would cripple any hopes of “mass deportations” or widespread immigration enforcement.
Warrants are *not* required for ICE arrests under US law right now. They simply need probable cause that the target is detainable/deportable on immigration grounds and use I-200 and I-205 civil administrative warrants.
The most common judicial warrants ICE uses to target aliens right now is for illegal re-entry (8 USC 1326), a federal felony when a deported alien has re-entered the U.S. after deportation. But again, that is a limited population as most non-citizens haven’t been deported before.
ICE *does* need a judicial warrant to enter homes. Their administrative warrants do not allow them to enter private property. That’s why we often see them waiting for a target to go to or from work when they’re in public.
One ICE contact in a sanctuary city tells me: “If we need a judicial warrant for every arrest, we would maybe have 15 arrests in a year.” (In his city).
Fighting Entropy retweeted
The truth with immigration is that while both interior and border enforcement are necessary, doing it at the border is politically acceptable and relatively rapid, while doing it inside the country is politically fraught, resource intensive, and involves situational arrests.
Unlike many others on the left, Bob doesn’t make mention of the 2A rights of the victim being violated, because being armed at a protest was criminalized in WA state in 2021.
Another person shot by ICE agents. Another life lost. Our descent into authoritarian rule continues. This is a dark chapter in our history, America. Don’t sit on the sidelines. Defend your democracy while you still can.
cnn.com/us/live-news/ice-min…
If I blocked the road in front of federal agents engaged in operational activity, I would reasonably expect to be, at a minimum, detained, if not outright arrested.
I’m interested to see if the politicians from the ‘don’t follow illegal orders’ video will now assert that the forces involved in the Venezuela operation should’ve declined to participate in what is being painted on the left as an illegal operation.
The real test of the congresspeople condemning the Venezuela action will be if they bring legal suit against the presidency. My bet is that it is all just political posturing.
Not exactly the actions of a dictator.
The 200 federalized California National Guard members sent to Portland, Oregon, and another 200 federalized Texas National Guard members sent to Chicago will return to their home states, according to two U.S. officials.
abcnews.link/9wEYbGZ
The Dems shutting down the government because ‘Orange man bad’ was one of the dumbest things I’ve witnessed in a long time.
The truth with immigration is that while both interior and border enforcement are necessary, doing it at the border is politically acceptable and relatively rapid, while doing it inside the country is politically fraught, resource intensive, and involves situational arrests.