Choose-your-fixed-rate loans. From @yearnfi

onchain
Joined May 2024
ysyBOLD on .@flexmeow has one of the best stablecoin farms! Mainnet: ysyBOLD/USDC: +46.83% The majority of the debt is locked in at a fixed 2.6% borrow rate and a fixed 2.7% rate gives you a solid redemption buffer. You can one-click enter at .@Yieldzio ! Follow me for more!
3
7
1
23
913
it's a peaceful existence 🐈‍⬛
1
2
8
281
disclaimers: * morpho is great * rates are a mess on aave too * aave is also great
1
56
Flex retweeted
meow 100% utilization in all markets in @flexmeow
1
2
3
24
1,789
what's cooking good looking 🦙👀
2
1
2
10
948
Replying to @ruvaag
on @flexmeow you choose your own fixed rate, infinite term catch is you could be redeemed - when lenders or higher paying borrowers want liquidity, they redeem existing positions, starting from the lowest paying ones
1
5
166
“whats our GTM strategy?”
3
9
20
1,555
gm quick Flex opportunities update yvUSD liquidity available: - ~276k USDC at avg rate (~21% APY at max loop) - ~600k USDC at 5.2% borrow (~19% APY at max loop) yBOLD liquidity available: - ~142k USDC at avg rate (~25% APY at max loop) - ~211k USDC at 2.9% borrow (~22% APY at max loop) yvcrvUSD liquidity available: - ~44k USDC at avg rate (~45% APY at max loop) - ~100k USDC at 1.2% borrow (~43% APY at max loop) yvWETH liquidity available: - ~10 WETH at 0.4% (~30% APY at max loop) 🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛
1
3
14
622
Flex retweeted
the yvUSD market is a great showcase of how a Flex market matures ~600k USDC of liquidity seems large enough for real competition between loopers to emerge utilization reaches 100% quickly, but the avg borrow rate starts low over time, loopers redeem each other and the avg rate rises until the market finds its clearing price and starts to stabilize in this case, loopers seem to target ~15% APY with yvUSD earning ~6.2%, they can afford to pay around 5% to borrow and because Flex runs @ 100% util, lenders earn that full ~5% -- no idle liquidity drag (at 90% util, they'd earn ~4.5%) looking at similar loops elsewhere (eg siUSD on Morpho), there still seems to be room for borrow rates to move higher as the market grows and larger loopers enter, that should happen naturally
3
2
19
1,345
the yvUSD market is a great showcase of how a Flex market matures ~600k USDC of liquidity seems large enough for real competition between loopers to emerge utilization reaches 100% quickly, but the avg borrow rate starts low over time, loopers redeem each other and the avg rate rises until the market finds its clearing price and starts to stabilize in this case, loopers seem to target ~15% APY with yvUSD earning ~6.2%, they can afford to pay around 5% to borrow and because Flex runs @ 100% util, lenders earn that full ~5% -- no idle liquidity drag (at 90% util, they'd earn ~4.5%) looking at similar loops elsewhere (eg siUSD on Morpho), there still seems to be room for borrow rates to move higher as the market grows and larger loopers enter, that should happen naturally
3
2
19
1,345
been prompting a lil added some more data visuals to the UI: - market rates & utilization over time, shows the magic of markets @ 100% util (S/O @JxyHelper) - claimable fees (currently accumulating for token lockers) - protocol metrics over time - movable containers -- so can always fit the Flex logo into the screenshot more to come!
3
3
19
711
def check out @Yieldzio superpower tool for 🧑‍🌾 ~20% on yvUSD ~20% on yBOLD ~60% on yvcrvUSD ~30% on yvWETH fixed rates 1-click ETH pumping life is good
Awesome stable farms from .@flexmeow are now one-click supported on Yieldz. io! > Flex allows farmers to select a fixed borrow rate > Flex is unique in that it allows users to loop up even if the market is max borrowed > Selecting a borrow rate above existing position rates allows the system to redeem the lower interest rate positions and to open up your position > Flex lenders benefit by having more of their lent assets utilized giving them the best yieldz > Yieldz by default assumes an interest rate one tick above 50% of the total borrowed amount per market, but users can easily select their desired rates in the UI
4
3
22
1,083
up to >30% on ETH cc @fundstrat
2
20
1,088
the (small) eagle has landed 🦅 big eagle will take a few more days
welcome the new Future of France frontier 🇫🇷 yvWETH-2 loop on Flex this @yearnfi WETH vault earns >3.5% by running looping + carry trade strategies across @aave, @Morpho, @CurveFinance, @LiquityProtocol, and more allocations are auto-optimized and monitored 24/7 by bots (AI!!!!). less frequently, also by humans WETH seed not here yet, but seems imminent
1
1
14
2,520
welcome the new Future of France frontier 🇫🇷 yvWETH-2 loop on Flex this @yearnfi WETH vault earns >3.5% by running looping + carry trade strategies across @aave, @Morpho, @CurveFinance, @LiquityProtocol, and more allocations are auto-optimized and monitored 24/7 by bots (AI!!!!). less frequently, also by humans WETH seed not here yet, but seems imminent
4
2
34
3,100
Flex retweeted
Replying to @flexmeow
@flexmeow update! Fixed-rate lending, borrowing, looping, redemptions, how borrowers compete for liquidity by setting their own rate. Also covers what changed in V2 and why Flex can now support locked assets, RWAs, and other forms of duration.
4
16
930
yesterday was the first ever liquidation on Flex 💦 a Trove backed by yBOLD slipped 0.17% below the max CR of 110% a liquidator repaid the max allowed amount of debt to bring the Trove back to the configured "safe CR" of 120%, for a ~0.66% fee (~17 USDC) the looper lost 3.5% of his equity compare that with a liquidation on eg Morpho, where the position would get fully liquidated, with a fixed liq fee of 2.62% the looper would have lost 27% of his equity in this case, getting liquidated on Flex was ~87% less destructive partial liquidations + dynamic liq fee in action
6
3
2
26
3,055
loop vs hold vs lend: yvUSD case study assumptions: - yvUSD pays 6% - loopers want 15% loop (10x) --> earn 15% hold --> earn 6% lend --> earn 5% now imagine yvUSD takes a 5% loss loop (10x) --> lose ~50% (excluding liquidation costs) hold --> lose ~5% lend --> no loss* so same collateral, but different R/R
1
3
15
1,549
*assuming no bad debt. depending on market params and collateral loss/market conditions, lenders could take a loss as well. still likely smaller than looping/holding though
94