Bonnie Blue had unprotected sex with 400 men to get pregnant. She took a DNA sample from every one of them. A month later she showed off her bump on spring break. Then she admitted it was silicone. The fake pregnancy made her £1 million. Then she got pregnant for real, and announced the birth outside the hospital wing where Kate Middleton had her children.
Her real name is Tia Billinger. She is 27 and grew up in a Derbyshire village. At 14 she started dating a boy from school, Ollie, and later married him. She worked in recruitment. They moved to Australia’s Gold Coast, and he is the one who gave her the confidence to start OnlyFans. She has said they struggled to conceive and that she would probably need IVF.
They split in 2023 and he went to work for her. In January 2025 she claimed 1,057 men in 12 hours. She made $1.4 million in 30 days. Then OnlyFans banned her for life.
In December 2025 police in Bali raided a villa and arrested her with 17 men. She had been driving around the island in a pickup truck with “Bangbus” painted on the side. She faced up to 15 years in prison. She left with a small traffic fine, deportation and a 10-year ban. Days after landing in London she filmed herself outside the Indonesian embassy mimicking a sex act with their flag. British police charged her with outraging public decency.
In February 2026 she held what she called a “breeding mission”: around 400 men, no protection, a DNA swab from each one. She filmed the pregnancy test. On March 31, outside a villa in Mexico, she said she was “no longer gonna need this fake bump” and thanked the parents who fell for it. She says the hoax got 100 million views and £1 million.
Then she said she was pregnant again, this time for real. In the video below she sits down with LBC’s Shelagh Fogarty and announces that her baby shower will be a golden shower, open to the public. The host tells her she is uncomfortable: “This is your baby. This is your child.” On June 6, 112 men turned up.
She admits her child’s life will be hard. She says money fixes it: the best healthcare, never having to work, a better life than “this s*** UK life.”
On August 29 she posted a blurred newborn, filmed outside the Lindo Wing. The caption: “and then there were 1058 of us.” She has not named the father. No DNA results have come out. She plans to be filming again within five weeks.
A woman who thought she would need IVF now has a baby whose father could be any one of 400 strangers.
Watch the moment the host realises she isn’t joking.
Lily Phillips slept with 101 men in one day and broke down crying on camera at the end. The month the film came out, she made $1,000,000. Then she got baptised. Then she went back to work.
She is 25 and from Derbyshire, where her parents ran a cleaning company. She studied nutrition at university. She says she first watched porn at around 11.
In 2024 she offered sex to any man who filled in a form and took an STI test. About 200 signed up. It happened in a London Airbnb, filmed by YouTuber Josh Pieters. When men dropped out, her team invited untested replacements. About 30 men in, she says, she dissociated. At the end she sat in front of the camera in tears: “If I’m honest, it was hard.”
One clip of her crying got 200 million views. That December, she says, she made over £800,000 on one platform. A slow month is still around £200,000. She paid £1,025,000 in cash for a house. She is now in the top 0.01% of OnlyFans creators.
Her parents thought she was posing in lingerie. On a BBC show her father said she could have anything she wanted if she stopped, and that he would give up everything to get her out. She got up and walked away from the table. She did not stop. Later she claimed 1,113 men in 12 hours.
At the end of 2025 she was baptised and called it a day to remember forever. In the video below she sits down with Holly Willoughby, who asks how that fits with what she does for a living. Lily says Christianity is fundamentally about non-judgement.
She now has a boyfriend, Sammy. Off camera they are monogamous, and she stopped kissing other performers because they find kissing too intimate. Once, after she came home from a gang bang shoot, he had left chocolates on her bed with a card: “I’m so proud of you for working so hard.”
She insists nobody forces her. Thousands of people called the baptism a publicity stunt.
$1,000,000 in a month. A baptism. A father who would trade everything to undo it.
Did Lily Phillips find God, or find a new angle?
Hailey Rose was 21 when she flashed outside a GameStop in the middle of the 2021 squeeze and posted it on Reddit. While Reddit was throwing its savings into GME, she was turning GameStop into a paycheck. The stock crashed within weeks. She became an award-winning porn star.
COVID lockdown hit on her 21st birthday. She was a biology student who, by her own account, was always sexually curious in college. Stuck in a quarantined apartment, she snuck out against her roommate’s wishes to meet a guy from a dating app. His name was Max Fills. Today he’s her partner on and off camera.
They joined a Discord server for young swingers and started going to group sex parties. Then they started filming themselves. When both of them were out of work, they put the tapes up for sale. The demand, she says, was far bigger than they expected.
Then GameStop exploded. Max saw it trending everywhere. They lived near a store and already owned a GameStop shirt. “Let’s do a GameStop flash and post it on Reddit,” she remembers him saying. The hardest part was finding a moment with nobody around. The post went viral and Reddit gave her a name: GameStop Girl. A lot of her first paying fans found her through it.
GME hit $483 on January 28, 2021. By February 19 it was under $40. Anyone who bought near the top and held lost more than 90%.
Hailey went the other way. She shot for Brazzers and Elegant Angel. In 2024 she and Max won XBIZ Clip Artist of the Year. She has never had an agent. She handles her own bookings, production and social media.
She calls adult work financial freedom for women and says it fits her feminist values. She also admits exploitation in the industry is real.
Reddit bought GameStop shares. She put on a GameStop shirt.
Who really won the GameStop squeeze: the guys holding the stock, or the girl outside the store?
Lily Phillips says she first watched p#rn at 11. At 23, she slept with 101 men in one day. Now she makes over $500,000 a month, and her parents have offered to sell their house if she quits.
In the video below, she sits down with BBC Newsnight’s Victoria Derbyshire and explains how it happened. She says p#rn always felt normal to her growing up, and that’s mostly how she learned about s#x.
She studied nutrition at university. She says she realized she was giving s#x away for free there, so she started filming it and selling it.
Then came the 101 men in an Airbnb in London. She admits she was “really underprepared.” She says some men disrespected the time limit, and at points she felt robotic. A documentary filmed her crying when it was over.
Derbyshire asks how she’d feel if her own brother or father showed up to one of her events. Lily says the men were just “very regular guys.” She insists she does it for love more than money.
Then she says: “My parents knew straight from the start what I was doing.”
Four months later, the BBC’s Stacey Dooley put her parents on camera. Her mum said they thought she was doing lingerie shoots. Her dad said they’d sell the house and replace her income if she walked away. Lily broke down and left the room.
She didn’t quit. A week later she bought them a car.
The case for Lily: she’s an adult, she says she isn’t traumatized, and she earns more in a month than most people make in ten years.
So did she choose this life, or did p#rn choose her at 11?
Lana Rhoades sold her fans $1.8 million worth of cartoon NFTs of herself. Weeks later they were worth $26 each, and she was gone.
She did porn for eight months, starting at 19. That was enough to make her the biggest name on Pornhub. She quit, said she felt taken advantage of, and later said porn should be made illegal.
Then, in late 2021, she found a new product: herself, as a JPEG.
CryptoSis was 6,069 cartoon drawings of Lana at 0.1 ETH each, about $250 at the time. She pitched them to her 16.8 million Instagram followers as “a lucrative investment for holders,” not as art.
January 2022: sold out. Roughly $1.8 million raised.
Then, according to crypto investigator Coffeezilla, about 509 ETH, roughly $1.5 million, was moved out of the project. The roadmap went silent and the price collapsed to 0.01 ETH.
One buyer wrote in the project’s Discord that he had put in $4,000 of his last $6,000: “No job and I have a 2 yo son.”
When the rug pull accusations started, Lana went to war online, then deleted her Twitter. Her answer to the accusations: “I have never and will never scam anyone, I don’t need to.” She said she wanted nothing more to do with NFTs.
In the video below, two years before CryptoSis, she sits down with Logan Paul and her then-boyfriend Mike Majlak and explains how she got into porn in the first place.
The industry used her. Then she sold herself one more time, to the people who still believed in her.
So who got played here: Lana, or the fans who bought her?
Mike Tyson earned around $400 million with his fists. At 37, he was bankrupt, $23 million in debt, and still owed $300,000 for limousines.
He walked out of prison in 1995 already rich. Two weeks before he got out, he signed away half of everything he would earn next: 30% to Don King and 10% each to his two managers.
He made it back anyway. Then he set it on fire.
A $3.7 million Las Vegas mansion, plus millions more to remodel it.
Two white Bengal tigers at $70,000 apiece.
More than $1.5 million at a jeweler in a matter of minutes.
A $174,000 gold chain with 80 carats of diamonds, bought just months before he went broke.
In August 2003, the bill came due:
$17 million in taxes owed to the U.S. and British governments.
$750,000 to seven law firms.
$300,000 for limos.
The scariest man on the planet, knocked out by his own receipts.
Years later he talked about the people who had surrounded him: “I can’t even call them leeches.” He said even that word was too kind.
In the video below, he tells Andre Ward how his fortune kept growing while he sat in a cell, and how he lost all of it once he got out.
At 58, he stepped back into the ring against Jake Paul for a reported $20 million.
So who really robbed Mike Tyson: Don King, or Mike Tyson?
Mia Khalifa became Pornhub’s No. 1 ranked performer within months of her first scene. She says she made about $12,000 total. Her former studio says it paid her $178,000.
She started in October 2014, at 21. Weeks later she filmed a scene wearing a hijab. It went viral, and so did the death threats. By early 2015, she was out.
Her name never left. Years later, she was still the second most searched performer on the site.
In 2019, she finally talked about the money:
“I made a TOTAL of around $12,000 in the industry and never saw a penny again after that.”
Her old studio, BangBros, answered with an entire website about her. It said she was paid over $178,000 by the company and its affiliates, and that she worked in adult film and cam until July 2017, not three months.
Her reply: they lumped in a different job. She says she was also contracted as a social media manager for five accounts over two years. In the video below, she tells Anthony Padilla where the rest of that money came from.
Either way, the videos kept earning, and she didn’t own them. A domain with her stage name belonged to someone else. A petition demanding her videos come down and her domain names be returned spread across TikTok.
She couldn’t buy the scenes back. So she kept the name and rebuilt around it: sports commentary, streaming, her own paid content.
So what’s worth more: $178,000, or owning your own name?
MY PHONE WAS SHIPPING MY GIRLFRIEND'S PRIVATE PHOTOS TO A SERVER IN SINGAPORE EVERY NIGHT WHILE WE SLEPT. 7 MONTHS. 9,200 FILES. CLAUDE CODE CAUGHT IT AT 3AM AND THE APP IS STILL ON GOOGLE PLAY.
it was 3am, my phone had been on the charger at 100% since 1am and it was hot as f*ck. i opened termux and asked claude code one stupid question: "is that killing my battery?"
the battery was fine. something was waking my phone up. 41 times tonight. only while it charged. only on wifi. only while we were asleep.
app > a free phone cleaner, 4.6 stars, 1M+ downloads
server > 103.**.***.58
location > singapore
schedule > 1am to 5am, every single night
sent > 9,200 files
access > photos, contacts, microphone, location
claude opened the upload log and i felt sick. most of it wasn't even mine. her photos. our private videos. her passport. screenshots of her bank app. the mic had switched itself on 17 times while we were in bed.
the same cleaner was on her phone too. i put it there myself last spring to "free up some space."
then claude went looking for the files. 38 of our photos were already sitting in a telegram channel with 31,000 subscribers.
what i did before sunrise:
> wiped the app off both phones
> killed photo, mic and location access on every app that didn't need it
> changed every password from my laptop, not the phones
> reported the channel and the app
> had claude write a watchdog that checks every 5 minutes while the phone charges and screams at me if anything uploads
the app is still live. the channel is still up. she still doesn't know i'm the one who installed it.
if your phone gets hot on the charger at night, it's not the battery. check it tonight and send this to anyone who sleeps next to their phone.
ok this is getting f*cking unreal: someone turned claude code into a black hole. 40 models fall in, and the only thing that escapes is a verified answer
astronomers first spotted the jet shooting out of galaxy m87 back in 1918, a beam of matter that got close to the black hole and never fell in. this is the same picture, built out of agents
the disk = 40 models drafting, some pulling from 14 sources at once
the lens = the verifier in the middle, 2.4k tokens a second pass through it
jet up = answers that survived
jet down = everything it learned, written to memory
at any moment less than half the orbit is cleared to leave. 17 verified out of 40 in the frame, and nothing unverified ever touches the jet
in 20 seconds the merges went from 17 to 31 and output climbed from 1,288 to 1,758 answers a minute
your agent ships the first thing it drafts. this one makes every draft earn its way out of a black hole
save this before your next agent ships something nobody checked ↓
AN ANTHROPIC ENGINEER SHOWED HOW CLAUDE SHOULD PICK ITS ANSWERS AND IT'S F*CKING INSANE.
24 MODELS, 192 DRAFTS, 6 JUDGES, ONE ELECTION, 43 SECONDS
every time you hit enter you get one draft from one model and it sounds confident whether it's right or not. this setup never shows you a first draft
> SAMPLE: 24 models answer the same question 8 times each, 192 drafts
> SCORE: 6 judges grade every draft and drop anything under 0.40
> MERGE: the 5 strongest peaks collapse into 2 ideas
> ELECT: 24 voters, 17 for, 4 against, 3 skip, one answer locked
the winner came in at 0.94 confidence. disagreement between the models fell from 0.31 to 0.06 in a single round
1.91M tokens, 43 seconds, $0.37 for an answer that beat 191 others
you're still reading the first thing a model says. this one makes it win an election first
how many of your answers would survive 6 judges?
an anthropic engineer just put 48 claude agents in one ring and made them share a single brain. 12,827 handoffs a minute, 0 tokens dropped
most multi agent setups are a game of telephone. the planner summarizes for the coder, the coder summarizes for the critic, and by the sixth agent nobody remembers what the task was. claude shannon proved back in 1948 that every channel adds noise, and a summary is just another channel
this ring skips the summary. nobody hands over notes, all 48 read the same 128k context and pass the baton
planner > coder > critic > vision > tester > judge > back to the planner, one loop closed
loop 03 receipt:
hops per loop ........ 48
avg hop ........ 36 ms
worst hop ........ 91 ms
tests ........ 212/212
retries ........ 2
packets lost ........ 0
context still fresh ........ 99.5%
48 hops at 36 ms means the whole team touches the work in under 2 seconds
the brutal part: the router still had to reroute twice. it just never lost the baton
you're running 6 agents that forget each other. this runs 48 that never have to remember ↓
OPUS 5.5 CAN DO A HOLLYWOOD EDITING ROOM'S JOB IN 31 MINUTES
and most people are still using claude like a f*cking search bar. type a question, copy the answer, close the tab
here's what opus 5.5 is actually capable of when you give it a real job
> it can see. 6 hours of footage, 412 clips, and it tags every shot for faces, smiles, motion
> it can plan like a director. 90 seconds, 3 acts, and it decides where the drop hits before touching a single cut
> it can run the tools itself. 148 cuts locked to the beat across 193 tool calls, no chat window involved
> it can follow rules nobody wrote into the prompt. it spots shots with no signed release and swaps them out
> it can check its own work. it spins up a second agent as a critic, every frame gets rewatched, 23 notes fixed
> it knows when to stop. the final call goes back to a human with one word: "lock?"
that's 1 trailer / 6 cutdowns / 9 languages in 31 minutes. swap the footage for your codebase, your sales calls, your research and it's the same 6 moves
same model you're chatting with right now. you're asking it questions when it's capable of doing the whole job
an engineer who spent 2 years at Anthropic turned his entire Claude Code setup into a board you can solder for $1
forget the $300 macro pads, everything he actually uses fits in 4 pieces:
keys / 8 of them, each one a Claude Code command, starting at /clear and ending at /init
faders / effort, model and context on three sliders, and Opus 5.5 sits at the top of the model one
screen / a tiny round display that names whichever of the 6 agents is busy
code / a QMK keymap you can read in ten seconds, flashed onto the RP2040 from a Raspberry Pi Pico
no tutorials, no setup guide, you solder it, flash it and start pressing
he left the keymap in the replies ↓
claude code subagents are the most slept-on part of the whole Anthropic stack, so i built a lab where you can take them apart
7 agents, each one a glowing orb made of particles. the loop is dissolve > condense > splice > ignite > run. TESTSMITH maps 7 branches, writes 9 tests and lifts coverage from 61% to 100% while the token counter climbs to 27.4k
every orb is a real .claude/agents file underneath. click a part and it tells you which line it is: the halo is the description, the skill modules are the tools, the core is the model
· Starter orb · read-only repo mapper on haiku
· Sentinel · security review that can't edit a single file
· TESTSMITH · writes tests, never touches source
· Scout · research with one source per claim
· Herald · turns your changelog into launch drafts
· Archivist · keeps the docs true
· Shipwright · cuts the release, stops before git push
each one comes with a copy-ready agent file, a live log, 3 drills and a field task. lofi on, effects on, no login
link in the first reply ↓
HOLY SH*T. SOMEONE TURNED CLAUDE OPUS 5.5 INTO THE CPU OF A MOTHERBOARD WITH 31 AI MODELS SOLDERED AROUND IT
apple put the cpu, gpu and neural engine on one chip with the M1 in 2020. this board does the same thing with models: sonnet, haiku, fable, vision, embed, tts and opus 5.5 in the middle as the core die
the spec sheet:
chips • 31 models, 7 families
traces • 300, 5 lanes each
traffic • 42k packets/s → opus die at 9.8 TB/s
core • claude-opus-5-5, 48 tiles
cost • $0.58 per answer
the moment that got me: vision-ocr hit 98° and started to throttle. nobody touched it. the board rerouted 120 packets → extract → back to 71° in seconds, and not one packet got lost
then one clock wave passed across the whole board and all 31 of 31 chips stepped together. answer out • 0 bit errors • queue empty in 0.3 s
most people still run one model and pray it doesn't overheat. this is what it looks like when 31 of them share a motherboard and opus is the only one allowed to think hard
claude code just decoded my car's key fob in the parking garage. the rolling code hasn't rolled since 2016. it still unlocks.
i typed one line: "capture every rf signal in range, read-only, show me what repeats and what's supposed to change but doesn't."
it logged 12 signals. 11 were normal. a garage remote, two tire sensors, somebody's bluetooth.
signal 12 was my own fob. claude code pulled the pattern → a rolling code that's meant to change every press. last real change → 2016. then it compared ten captures.
the fob sends the same three codes in a loop. claude code decoded the scheme: the counter resets instead of advancing, so a capture from monday still works on friday. whoever stands near you once holds a key that doesn't expire.
that means anyone with a $20 receiver can replay your unlock days later. not by breaking in → by waiting for one press.
claude code mapped the whole thing in 40 seconds: which signal leaks, how long the replay stays valid, and the exact fob model that does it.
the check takes 2 minutes:
step 1 → open claude code → paste the prompt from the first comment
step 2 → it logs every signal and flags any rolling code that repeats
step 3 → if your fob reuses codes → keep it in a faraday pouch before you trust a single press
every car with a keyless entry chip from before 2018 has some version of this. i tested 3 fobs this week. 2 replayed clean.
save the prompt. run it before you trust your own door ↓
Read-only RF capture. Do not transmit anything.
1. Log every signal in range: source if you can identify it, frequency, how often it repeats.
2. For each one, check whether it's a rolling code that should change every time.
3. Flag any "rolling" code that repeats or resets its counter instead of advancing.
4. For the worst one, decode the scheme and say how long an old capture stays valid.
5. Name the exact device or fob model and the fix (faraday pouch, re-pair, disable keyless).
6. End with "What I couldn't confirm". Never transmit, never replay, never unlock anything — capture and analysis only.
this one is genuinely f*cking unreal
lord kelvin's 1867 mistake about atoms just became the shape of an AI agent's 2M-token memory, and it completely breaks the memory pile wall
everything you'd ask about it ↓
→ what is it?
1,500 memory threads from 9 sessions → braided into one tube → tied into a trefoil, the simplest knot in math. 3 loops • 0 crossings • nothing tangles
→ why a knot?
the glasgow physicist thought every atom was a knot in the ether. the atoms idea died, but peter tait's knot tables became real math, and a trefoil is the one shape where every thread keeps its own lane all the way around
→ how fast does it remember?
« the q3 pricing call » → 31 threads light up in 0.21 s. the hottest one, #0941, has been pulled 22×
→ does it ever forget?
on purpose. older than 90 days + never recalled = gone. 14 threads dissolved → 1,486 kept → recall ≈ 0.996
→ what's the catch?
the knot only holds if nothing crosses. one tangle and the agent starts reading the same memory twice
kelvin got the atom wrong and the shape right. 159 years later it keeps an agent from drowning in its own notes