gareth retweeted
I come from a Star Trek family. My mom grew up watching the original series, & my grandfather called her, a skinny kid, "Bones" after Dr. McCoy. My brother & I came up with TNG (our childhood dog's name was Mr. Worf), & as an elder millennial, Picard was *my* captain. Stewart played Picard with a perfect balance of stoicism, integrity & compassion that was reflected in how he lived his life. What a loss.
gareth retweeted
Star Trek TNG had a profound impact on me growing up, and Patrick Stewart’s role above all: the secular, rationalist, egalitarian, post-scarcity (whisper it: socialist) vision of the future, a completion of the Radical Enlightenment project married to a sort of Aristotelian sense of virtue, duty, and deep purpose, a Shakespearean, theatrical-literary, humanist forgiveness and celebration of our foibles and fallenness, and Age of Discovery romantic call to adventure and exploration. I remain a believer that this world can yet be built.
gareth retweeted
Patrick Stewart was, like many of the greatest British artists of the 20th Century, a working class boy who became a world-class artist thanks to a public arts education made possible by Post War social democracy. He never forgot it.
gareth retweeted
People have been obsessed with disproving Chomsky for decades. There’s a guy who moved to the Amazon, abandoned his religion, and destroyed his marriage on that question. You’ll have to try harder.
Chomsky was wrong.
Researchers found your brain doesn’t store language the way every textbook since 1957 claims.
For decades, the undisputed rule of linguistics, led by Noam Chomsky, was that human language is hierarchical.
We were told our brains process language using complex "grammar trees." That we secretly build deep, abstract, mathematical rules in our heads before we speak.
This new paper proves that is completely wrong.
Researchers at Cornell University analyzed how people actually process and produce language in real time.
They found sequences. Linear chunks.
When we speak, we aren't calculating deep syntactic rules. We are just predicting the next most logical sequence of words based on the context of the words right before it.
We string linear chunks together.
If this sounds familiar, it should.
This is exactly how Large Language Models like ChatGPT work.
For years, critics have dismissed AI as "just a next-token predictor." They said it isn't truly intelligent because it doesn't understand deep grammatical hierarchies like humans do.
But this paper suggests humans don't use those hierarchies either.
We are just predicting the next chunk.
Language isn't a rigid tree of mathematical rules. It's a linear stream of contextual predictions.
We thought we were building AI to mimic the complexity of the human brain.
It turns out, the human brain was just running a simpler algorithm all along.
gareth retweeted
"See how my paws look like tiny little hands? I’m absolutely precious. Just let me in." – A Raccoon onion.com/W5TbrY
gareth retweeted
The real US/Can split didn't start with Trump 2.0, it actually started March 22 2024, with the outbreak of violence in the long dormant Kendrick/Drake beef
gareth retweeted
This is a ridiculous way to go about it. Absolutely ridiculous. AI, told to find things wrong, will find things wrong. You still need to go through and identify what mistakes actually matter! Uncritically reposting this discredits the reposter. Right now it’s just a DDoS attack.
Errors in the research of Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman marginalrevolution.com/margi…
Sometimes I read something I wrote and I'm like "damn that guy sounds smart" and other times I'm like "who is this moron"
Cuban ambassadors ask Canada to renew its rejection of U.S. embargo and fuel blockade ctvnews.ca/canada/article/cu…
gareth retweeted
Canada is acquiring 15 top of the line 'river class' destroyers from the UK (similar to T26 frigate).
and 12 top of the line SSKs from the German-Norwegian program.
Also acquiring 14-16 P8 Poseidon aircraft (best ASW plane in the world).
This will be a serious naval power. Also don't rule out the possibility of Canada eventually acquiring SSNs as well (from UK or France).
gareth retweeted
This movie is so insanely good.
Scorcese's thesis of palimpsest Americana is much more controversial than people realize.
gareth retweeted
The thing is. And this was a major 🔑 for me several years ago, in thinking about the podcast, is that communists are obsessed with capitalism. Some of them are so obsessed that they might even secretly love it. Whereas capitalists rarely spend any time thinking about it.
Weird take here but I've always been a bit confused at the way Conan's face has aged. His skin is wrinkly but also weirdly tight as well? How does that happen? Is this what aging as a ginger means?
gareth retweeted
If you take a look at the exchange here this kinda is an example of what I mean about some US libs and Canada. The person this account is debating (a US lib) is definitely against annexation but just cant seem to take the idea of distinct (Canadian) nationhood seriously
Replying to @VergenceS @metr0politics
This is exactly what Canadians mean. Referring to the fact that Canada is not a part of the US as an accident of history. It is a refusal to take the existence of other countries seriously.































