globosummed (@globosummed) header
globosummed (@globosummed) profile picture
Joined December 2024
Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)Photo by globosummed (@globosummed)
Class 1: Probability is logic nitter.cf/FamedCelebrity/status/…
CLASS: UNCERTAINTY & PROBABILITY THEORY Lesson 1: Logic. We start with Chapter 1 of ET Jaynes's "Probability Theory: The Logic of Science", and discover logic is both easier and harder than we thought. All questions will be answered in the following Monday's lecture.
4
3
1
26
3,072
I was blocked by Wilfred Reilly @wil_da_beast630 for pointing out that he was trying to raise a million dollars for a *literal child beater.*If u r still pumping the "based juror" narrative: log off. Ur brain has been fully fried by the discourse. And ffs don't give him money...
1
1
98
Too funny:There is actually a (more successful) GoFundMe set up for the juror. And it was set up by the man who did the fund for Shiloh Hendrix. A Pro-White, anti-diversity journalist is putting nearly $200k in a black child beater's pocket bc the internet told him he was based.
68
Just bc doxxing a juror is terrible, it does not follow that "in principle" you should give money to this specific juror. You're putting money into the pocket of a child beater, not preventing future doxxing. The message ur sending is, "I am manipulated by the algo."
Well, in principle, one might support this because, regardless of whatever may or may not be true of him, the intimidation of this and future jurors is unprecedented. Doing op-research on a juror is beyond the pale. You shouldn't even know about that restraining order.
2
2
89
I'm not. This type of rhetoric (mischaracterization of someone's words to further ur position) only works to gin up lowest common denominator (ur supporters). No one is excusing child murder. This entire case hinged on what happened to Clancy after she went on psych meds.
When a woman strangled three children to death, you described her as “normal” and “loving” and excused the murders because she was supposedly depressed. Now you’re pretending to be upset about a man allegedly grabbing a woman by the throat, even though he was never convicted of any crime and you’re getting all of this from hostile journalists with a very obvious axe to grind. Sorry but we aren’t going to let you move right from excusing the strangulation murder of three children to pretending to care about domestic violence. You’re a huge apologist for domestic violence. On the record. We won’t let any of you people ever forget that. Your credibility is done forever. Might as well just log off at this point. None of you will ever live this down.
19
1
8
2,033
No good faith reading of what I wrote would lead one to conclude that I condone child murder or domestic abuse. Or that I am excusing Clancy bc she was depressed. But Matt Walsh does not care. Bc he has been on a weeks long tirade to destroy any nuanced discourse on this topic.
9
4
479
Gross. Before the Clancy case, my opinion on Walsh was relatively neutral. Then he called "much" of PPD just women being selfish. Then he doubled & tripled down in his insulting rhetoric. Anyone who had a different opinion was excusing child murder. No one cld disagree w/him.
3
3
196
The "brave" black juror grabbed his wife by the throat and slammed her into a dresser. He punched his nephew in the face repeatedly, resulting in a restraining order. His own mother called him evil. RWers portraying him as a hero, tripping over themselves to pay him $$.
It turns out the one brave juror who stood for what is right on the Lindsay Clancy case is a black man. Does anyone know if there is a legitimate go fund me or donation link set up for him? There needs to be one.
7
1
3
651
Online Right devolving into full on woman hatred. Insulting their looks, their age. Calling them names. I remember when conservative voices at least feigned decency. They were the side of standards, decorum, morality. Today, they call elderly women "hideous idiotic wenches."
Dumb hideous women swooning over the lawyer and excusing the murder of three children. Every possible stereotype confirmed by these idiotic wenches.
4
2
539
Now they're "hags." Cool, cool ... but the Online Right doesn't have a woman problem, I am told ... Just men who cannot restrain themselves from name calling women they don't like. Disgusting. nitter.cf/MattWalshBlog/status/2…
The prosecution let a bunch of boomer feminist hags onto the jury. Literally zero chance of ever getting a guilty verdict with that jury. Total malpractice by the state. You really have to wonder whether the state threw the case on purpose. Hard to imagine any other explanation.
2
311
1.6k likes for a long, detailed fictional account of what was going on in Lindsay Clancy's mind. There's room for debate over what happened w/Clancy. But people are really going, "I know what she was thinking bc my gf was like this!" & then spinning elaborate fantasies. Ffs...
Lindsay Clancy did not hear voices. She just dealt with ordinary difficulties of being a parent in deranged way. I know how this works very well because I've gone through something similar with my girlfriend. Lindsay Clancy is an extremely neurotic person. She put herself in a position where she felt she had to be a control freak & it ended up making her extremely frustrated, then unhappy, then resentful to her children, who didn't conform to her micromanagement. Instead of chilling the fuck out, she escalated her resentment & started openly telling people she wanted to hurt her children. This is what happens when an angry, neurotic person doesn't get their way & won't back down. They internally escalate in their minds until they snap. She was basically putting a gun to the heads of her kids and telling everyone around her that she'd pull the trigger unless they solved her problems for her. But her problem was that she was a neurotic sociopath who could not handle that children could not conform to her absurd expectations. The only solution was for her to back down & accept that her personality was wrong & that she'd have to conform herself to the reality. But nobody checked her. Nobody fought her, or invalidated her, so her sick, twisted deviant mindset was like a runaway train headed for a clash with reality. And the only possible outcomes were that she'd "lose" & back down, or she'd have to escalate to overt violence just as she was threatening for months. If you keep telling yourself "if that MF does that shit one more time, I'm gonna!!!" over and over for months, you work yourself into a state where you feel psychically committed to violence & like the biggest loser in the world if you back down. This is what was happening in her mind. She responded to normal kids clashing with her neurosis with deranged mental escalation. It got out of her control. By December she was at her breaking point & open about harming the kids. She started and stopped & did not take as directed a bunch of different psychiatric medications looking for a quick fix (which they aren't) for a problem that was entirely based on her personality for which the only solution was for her to chill TF out. But her evil thoughts & mindset were dominant by this point & her weaker side was looking for a way out. >January 16: Amitriptyline prescribed. She reported having to force herself out of bed. Flat, depressed affect. By mid January she had a depressive episode where she "gave up". Her internal struggle between her violent, aggressive neurotic side & her weaker socialized self was over. Her socialized side didn't get the quick fix it wanted & she put herself in a position where she would have to choose to escalate to act on her many threats & fantasies, or abandon them. Had she abandoned them, she would have immediately solved all her problems, but it would have meant invalidating a big part of her personality. In her mind, it would have made her the biggest loser ever. Zero credibility. Her ego wouldn't allow that. Instead, she chose to escalate. This realization 1st manifested as depression and dissociation because part of her understood she'd be destroying her life, but the dominant part simply didn't care. She'd psyoped herself into a cycle of escalation where she was so angry and frustrated at her kids that, with no path to "winning", she was ready to kill them. People like this tell themselves that it's sort of "for the greater good" & they're teaching society a lesson. This is all BS. In reality it is just an extremely malformed personality trying to assert itself in a way that is totally at odds with reality, then coping with losing with a spiral of aggression & hatred that builds up to a breaking point. That's Lindsay Clancy. >January 22: Dinner at a family friend’s house; the friend found her quiet but “fairly normal.” Her parents visited that weekend. >January 23: Virtual appointment with Tufts. Depressed mood, flat affect, racing heart, no motivation. She denied suicidal or homicidal ideation. Tufts observed no psychosis. The December 22 phone note was modified that day. Then she started to act normal. And why wouldn't she? The dissonance was over. She'd already decided to murder her kids. And then she did it. In a very calculated, methodical way. And I bet it felt SO GOOD to her when she did it. This was the culmination of a HUGE build up of hatred and murderous fantasies towards her kids. This was the ultimate cathartic release. Bear in mind that she had to murder all 3 in sequence. She had a full opportunity after the murdered the 1st one to be like "wow that was horrible, I definitely don't want to do that 2 more times" but she was LOVING IT. But then something she never could have imagined happened. Once she finished murdering all 3 children: that horrible evil personality inside her driving her to do it DISAPPEARED. Like, you know how when a guy cums and then suddenly he has massive "post nut clarity" because his entire sexual motivation to do whatever it takes to get pussy just disappears? Same thing. She won. She got what she wanted. That part of her was totally satisfied, and, once satisfied, IT NO LONGER HAD ANY REASON TO CONTINUE TO EXIST, so it just faded away. Lindsay Clancy didn't really want to kill herself. But in her post nut clarity, she realized she would need to play the victim. She edited her phone note to blame the medications. She slit her wrists and neck very lightly knowing it was just for looks. Then she jumped out of a 2nd story knowing it would probably just injure her but not kill her. Evil women often do things like fake heart attacks after they get caught because "play the victim" is the only move these people have. And ever since that day, Lindsay Clancy has always acted like a rational person who wanted to minimize the consequences for herself. It's not even strongly mental illness that made her do it, it was just a cognitive defect in committing internally to control & escalation repeatedly until her emotional motives exceeded her conscious capacity for reason. ☕️
1
3
463
Uhuh, "White Woman Demanding Ppl Follow the Rules" alert. As is often the case, Karen was correct. Don't pollute the parks with plastic glitter and beads. Don't let click-farmers rage bait you into siding against someone just bc they're a white lady upholding (good) rules.
A dead stump. Kids put paint and glitter on it. That’s the entire crime. Then this insane Karen pulls out her phone, slaps on cartoon rage-eyes, and starts demanding the parents get fined like they knocked over a national monument. Lady. It’s a log. It’s already dead. The tree is not coming back because you filmed a sermon in the woods. This is not stewardship. This is a bored woman hunting a villain so she can feel important at a campsite. If your idea of nature is “no child may touch anything,” stay home. The forest does not need a hall monitor. Say it: she’s not defending an old tree. She’s LARPing as park ranger because kids had fun.
2
149
I'm really loving how both Left & Right have decided that an acceptable enemy target is white women. Anyone looking for clicks & likes, whether they're on the side of destroying white supremacy or preserving western civilization, will eagerly start braying abt awful white women..
1
73
The only time I will mention the Clancy trial on here (as someone who spent 3 years in defence including a female NGRI homicide case. and actually WATCHED every single day of the trial - taking full attendance notes as if I was on the jury/defence). I hope to god that none of the people cheering on that 1 male juror EVER get called for jury duty. The fact you refuse to, or just pretend you don’t, understand that 11 people had reasonable doubt, and that this one man did admit he had doubts but said he didn’t care, completely ignoring the law on reasonable doubt and the judges instructions is genuinely frightening. This was not a “I genuinely believe this on the facts, the forensic and testimonial evidence, and the judges instructions as to the law as to what’s being asked of me” and they simply disagreed on verdict. That wouldn’t be an issue. This man told his fellow jurors that yes, he did actually see points of doubt, but he was going to ignore that entirely. He should be held in contempt as this is jurors misconduct. And I hope to god none of you ever have to be judged by a juror like that. Genuinely embarrassing that some people think someone not following the law of the principle of reasonable doubt during the process of their civic duty is “based” or something to admire. And more embarrassing still, that you speak on this with such confidence without knowing a single element of the case other than what you’ve seen from snippets from right wing podcast bros online. You didn’t watch the case, you don’t understand what’s even being asked of the jury, you continue to ignore the actual background of any of the legal arguments, you refuse to acknowledge the constitutional right of presumption of innocence and fair trial, you play “hear no evil, see no evil” around the ‘admissions’ without acknowledging all of the not guilty pleas, you don’t understand why an NGRI defence was raised or the circumstances surrounding it, and you don’t even understand what’s happening legally, forensically, medically, psychologically. Whatsoever. Honestly disappointing seeing seemingly smart people behave like that. Particularly people who claim to have discernment.
695
551
66
4,293
195,486
Walsh at the lying-to-himself-&-others stage. Lindsay reported dissociation, feeling "spacey," disconnected, numb, out of body, "not in touch w/reality" & like a "zombie."Family said she was like a diff person. She told her mom she didn't feel like "me". She was suicidal.
The fact that she was “otherwise loving” when she wasn’t busy murdering all of her children does not prove or even indicate that she was insane at the time when the crime was committed. A huge number of murderers are basically nice people apart from the murdering. And a “rapidly deteriorating mental state” also does not prove or even indicate that she was insane. In fact it cuts against her because her mental states were extensively logged and charted and yet none of those mental states were ever diagnosed as psychotic or insane. She was sad, depressed, and frustrated. That’s what the record shows. And being sad, depressed, and frustrated doesn’t excuse murder or mean that you are unable to control your actions.
1
1
182
She wasn't just "sad." She was mentally deteriorating. Her deterioration coincided w/her taking psych meds, which continued to be prescribed while she continued to deteriorate. Hence the significance of her being "otherwise loving" before meds, & turning into a monster after.
70
In 1924, the US slammed the door closed and allowed very little immigration until the mid 1960s. In that period our country experienced the greatest industrial boom and the most rapid rate of technological progress the world has ever seen.
If you support an immigration moratorium you’re literally retarded and hate our economy
57
1,003
23
8,257
92,848
The insanity continued w/this moron while I slept, I guess. This man is not stable. Not observant. Not capable of contending w/disagreement. I never accused him of a being a narcissist.He will dish is out but if u dare return fire: BAM! "Narc! Cluster B!" Genuinely noxious.
Motivation confirmed. This is stereotyped Cluster B behavior online.
3
1
1
265
Also note what he cut off in that screen grab: His tweet claimed that there was simply no "talking to this" (ie me). But then he proceeded to try to sic his audience on me, w/multiple posts. *What am I supposed to think abt such a person*?
13
Btw: this default to "everyone I don't like is a narcissist" is like 10 yrs stale, esp for someone in the psych space. When I call this man insane,I'm not calling him a narcissist. I think he has a fragile ego, tied to intellectual superiority. It stings to have someone disagree.
11