
Official Hex Orange Address $HOA Contract: 0x7901a3569679AEc3501dbeC59399F327854a70fe Peel II Peel: 0x962A4859B3195D5218f9D5cC85ad Also on ETH, Base and Chia
The Orange Grove
Joined June 2022
- Tweets542
- Following210
- Followers1.6K
- Likes314
For clarity it's not the Hex ORANGE Address charging users a fee to use the billion dollar sacrifice protocols. You're looking for the guy behind the Hex ORIGIN Address. It's a common misconception. We're the good guys.
Replying to @piteasio
I think people need to chimp harder
It's like paying a HOA fee, every dapp on this chain taxes it's users specifically all the 'official' ones
At the end of the day, if there is a failure, such as the main bridge frontend being down due to a hardcoded RPC dependency then its 100% justified
Hex Orange Address retweeted
Tang Gang isn’t a person. It’s a principle.
And a lot of you are still misunderstanding that… or choosing to.
We are decentralized. We are autonomous.
That means people in Tang Gang will have different opinions, different personalities, different ways of moving.
Some you’ll respect.
Some you won’t.
That’s not a flaw — that’s the design.
But here’s the part that keeps getting twisted:
People see a few individuals they don’t like… and suddenly decide that’s what Tang Gang is.
Let me ask you something:
👉 Since when does a decentralized group get defined by a few voices you disagree with?
If that’s your standard… you were never trying to understand it in the first place.
Tang Gang has NEVER been about one voice.
It’s about:
• Open access
• Freedom to build
• Freedom to speak
• No permission needed
You don’t have to like everyone here.
Nobody does.
But confusing individuals with the ethos?
That’s where misinformation lives.
And let’s be real for a second…
Some of you aren’t misinformed —
you’re just choosing the easiest narrative because it fits your bias.
So let’s open it up:
If you think Tang Gang is something else — say it.
If you’ve got criticism — bring it.
If you support it — stand on it.
But do it honestly.
Because at the end of the day:
👉 Tang Gang is bigger than any one person
👉 Bigger than any one opinion
👉 Bigger than whatever narrative you’re holding onto
And that’s exactly why it makes people uncomfortable.
Hex Orange Address retweeted
TOP5 Most Voted #Pulsechain Ranking Projects - Week 10 🔥
🥇 $HEX @HEXcrypto
🥈 $DARK @AGProjectio
🥉 $CDP @CarpeDiemCDP
4️⃣ $HOC @HocusPocusFi
5️⃣ $HOA @hexoacoincom
The Hex Orange Address has never sold a single Hex
Replying to @toospooky @purepositivefun
Hex Orange Address retweeted
TOP5 Most Voted #Pulsechain Ranking Projects - Week 7 💎
🥇 $HEX @HEXcrypto
🥈 $DARK @AGProjectio
🥉 $CDP @CarpeDiemCDP
4️⃣ $HOC @HocusPocusFi
5️⃣ $HOA @hexoacoincom
Yes the HEX OA market cap is greatly distorted. A significant portion of HEX OA supply is locked or burned. Nearly 72m HEX OA is locked with 1.7m burned. This adds nearly 100% to circulating supply market cap.
Since the vast majority of HEX supply is locked for 15 years, the "Market cap" many sites show could be considered pretty wrong. Here's the current minted supply. 47B. That supply, at a penny would be like #130-#200 on various coin ranking sites (you know, the sites were people find scams to get scammed on.)
for anyone who needs our XCH address for the go4.me economy or for aligning community incentives, please feel free to use this address.
xch16gu7wtjpx3kfrp4hjq78khfun9ntnz6tv5hv5s5lugmjachc28kq3grrdx
we have raised nearly a full XCH just from go4 royalties!
Hex Orange Address retweeted
Rolling back the scan.pulsechain.box to the time before Bret decided to allow us to only use HTTP and rely on trusting him for security! Ever since I've started using the HTTP protocol I've only encountered massive problems at database level.
Will take a couple of days as my own RPC is still syncing and I have to restore the db to the moment before I've changed the transport protocol to HTTP.
Stand by tho', the moment it's done, my project will rely completely on my own infrastructure, thus removing the "trust" element he decided to bomb on us.
Never trust! Always verify! Security is first!
First the rate limiting, then asking us to use a protocol which implies we have to trust him!
Thank you for your patience and I promise this'll only do good for the project!
























