Georgy

Hey @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump what do you think about this? This is the thanks you get from Ukraine....

Cry harder Mike. Corruption yes... Ever hear of Jared Kushner? Ironically as a corrupt regime you couldn't fight yourself out of a wet paper bag. From 1812, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan now Iran the record doesn't scream powerful. Maybe some humility? With your bosses incompetence you couldn't even pull off another Grenada, let alone a resilient Cuba. Your betters couldn't even handle Canadian natives in 1812, remember the US invaded and ended up capitulating after American settlements like Detroit were captured. So your betters couldn't handle the god damn Canadians but your laughable admin will handle Cubans? How's it going with Iran again? Thank you God you had a face saving non-deal deal with Greenland. I hear those dog sleds are ferocious. As for Afghanistan yes Biden retreated but you were there from 2016-2020 and couldn't win it.

🇷🇺🇪🇺 "They could get there if they buy tickets"... That's Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov today, asked whether the Europeans get a seat at the Russia US Ukraine talks in Abu Dhabi. The rest of the line: "but no one intends to invite them to the negotiating table." And this a day after Stubb and Støre spent 90 minutes on the phone with Putin. Ushakov says a European seat wasn't even discussed. Meanwhile Mette Frederiksen was busy scolding the two of them for going "solo"... Støre's reply? The EU hasn't had a common message in four years. His words, not mine. Think about it. Years of refusing to talk, years of funding the war that is collapsing Europe and now the Eurocrats are standing outside the venue with no ticket. They pay the bill and don't get a seat at the table, which is exactly how they treat their own citizens ironically. So who is Europe actually negotiating for these days? Certainly not for Europeans!

🇷🇺🌍 Lavrov just told a room of African editors what the Western client media spends its life tiptoeing around... political independence came with the 1960s wave of decolonisation, but Africa's "second awakening" will be economic, with its richest resources used "in Africa itself so that added value is created there, rather than in the former colonial powers." The UN's own trade body backs him up, with UNCTAD counting 46 of Africa's 54 countries as commodity dependent. And today 48 of those 54 states turned up in Moscow for the Russia-Africa summit, 22 of them at head of state level (up from 17 in 2023). He told them a story that says it all. More than once, in a "friendly" country, he couldn't get his own plane refuelled because the oil facilities belonged to Western companies that had decided Russia was "behaving badly". Today Putin went further, quoting Thomas Sankara on debt as "neocolonialism" and accusing the West of trying to drive Africans back into "debt bondage" on predatory terms. Now the part Europe's ruling class never wants joined up. Ship the ore out raw, keep the factories and the margins at home, and you export the jobs as well.. then act shocked when young men follow the value chain north. Before NATO's illegal 2011 war on Libya, Italy logged 4,406 sea arrivals (2010). By 2016 it was 181,436, and per UNHCR 90% of them sailed from Libya. Knock the cork out of the bottle and then hold emergency summits about the flood... The pull side gets lobbied for in plain sight. Europe's big employer groups want an EU Talent Pool that is "demand-led" and recruits third country workers at every skill level, "low, medium and high". Cheap labour in, wages flat, and the friction billed to the working class. Then comes the show. George Soros earmarked $500m in 2016 ("Why I'm Investing $500 Million in Migrants", his own headline) on top of Open Society money for "migrant legal aid groups" across Europe. On the other side the US based Middle East Forum (a pro-Israel Zionist think tank, bankrolled by a self-described "ardent Zionist" donor Daniel Pipes) boasted in 2018 of funding Tommy Robinson's legal defence and organising the "Free Tommy" rallies in London (it cut ties in 2020). Two sides of the same neoliberal coin.. foreign money at both ends of Europe's migration shouting match, and not a cent of it ever went near the root cause. By the way, who profits when Europeans fight each other over the symptoms instead of asking who manufactured them? Gaslight both sides, divide and rule as you don't want folks to see it's the system stupid (not the fake left and fake right political parties). Brussels is busy working out how to borrow tens of billions more for Kiev, yet I've never once seen a summit on why Uganda's coffee leaves as raw beans and gets roasted, packed and branded somewhere else (Museveni's example, retold by Lavrov this week). Africa gets the mine, the shareholders get the margin, and the Complaints Department is a rubber dinghy off Lampedusa. (And before the "Kremlin talking points" brigade arrives... UNCTAD, UNHCR and the Italian Interior Ministry aren't run out of Moscow. Paris can keep hunting for whoever is "colonising minds", the minds are simply learning to count.) Extract Upstream, Blame Downstream. So who really gains from keeping Africa poor and Europe angry? Europe's Transatlantic puppets would sooner bankroll both sides of the argument than fix the one thing causing it. Want to fix migration? Stop the forever wars. Gadaffi warned of the consequences of destroying Libya but the same patrons of the Tommy Roninsons of the world lit the match and sold you the illegal war and when the natural consequences arrived much like the arsonist who cries about the blaze they blame the fire they lit the match on. This circus with no bread is so weak. At least Rome understood the need for better circus but also bread.

Kaja Kallas in January, on Iran: "Shutting down the internet while violently suppressing protests exposes a regime afraid of its own people." October: Paris tells telecom operators to be ready to cut TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat and X. Same year Different Capital. The "protests" it feared started in poor Paris suburbs, with high school kids angry about absent teachers and shabby classrooms. Then the cost of living piled in, fuel, prices, a welfare state fraying at the seams. On 17 October it boiled over. More than 1,800 arrests, Limoges town hall gutted by fire, Marseille city hall stormed. (Not legitimizing these riots but rather calling out blatant hypocrisy of the EU regime when Tehran pulls the kill switch for security reasons. By the way, who profits from these riots? So on Monday Macron went to that same Marseille city hall and named the culprit. Not the empty classrooms, not the empty fridges. Social media. Platforms "damage our democracies," he said, they are "instruments for mobilising the worst." Odoxa published its verdict today: 16% of the French think he's a good president. 83% think he's a bad one. A record. I reckon when you're that far underwater the algorithm isn't your problem... And it didn't stop at a speech. This week the Senate adopted the government backed amendment to the "casseurs-payeurs" bill. Platforms get one hour to pull anything the state flags as a call to "insurrection", 24 hours for calls to violence or damage. Miss the deadline and Paris can ask for the whole site to be blocked and scrubbed from search engines. Miss the 24 hours and the fine can hit 2% of global turnover. The same bill would make anyone who "knowingly took part" in a riot liable for the damage, whether they broke anything or not. Paris has form here. In May 2024 it switched off TikTok in New Caledonia during riots. The Conseil d'État later ruled that illegal, a disproportionate attack on freedoms. Lesson learned? No. The tool just got a better legal wrapper. When Tehran pulls the plug, Brussels calls it fear of the people. When Paris drafts the plug, it's "public order". Swap the flag and the press release writes itself. Now the bit nobody in the Élysée wants you to notice. The same state that can't keep teachers in suburban classrooms is restarting nuclear warhead production for the first time in decades, and stretching its "forward deterrence" over 10 European countries. Money for warheads. A one hour deletion deadline for posts deemed a danger to the Macron regime. Kallas was right about one thing. A government that reaches for the kill switch is afraid of its own people. She just pointed at the wrong capital. Hypocrisy laced with contempt for Europeans is the one thing these Eurocrats do well.

Brussels has spent 2026 promising a permanent ban on Russian oil with von der Liar calling any return a "strategic blunder". Now the FT reports Washington and Moscow are discussing US majors helping restart Russian oil sales to Europe through Druzhba with Europe begging for the same Russian energy it insulted mere months ago. Same Russian barrels, American middleman, European invoice. It's poetic alright but Russian poetic with a good helping of EU tragicomedy.

🇮🇱 Israel's "change" candidate tonight is Gadi Eisenkot.. the general who in 2008 put the Dahiya doctrine on the record: "We will apply disproportionate force... these are not civilian villages, they are military bases. This is not a recommendation. This is a plan." The Western client media calls this vote a "referendum on Netanyahu". I reckon it's closer to a change of management with the same Board of Directors. Exit polls: Eisenkot's bloc 52, Netanyahu's 50, both short of the 61 needed. Arab parties on a record 17 to 18 seats, on 77.7% turnout, the highest in over two decades. And the "change" man had already ruled every Arab party out of his government (tonight he hailed a "complete vote of no confidence" in Netanyahu.. from "the Zionist majority" Same Doctrine New Podium. Watch Western Europe and Washington toast this as a democratic reset. So tell me honestly, if Netanyahu goes and the doctrine stays, what actually changes for Gaza and Beirut?

Grok is ZOV!

🇮🇪 A slick new “Russian occupation” website asks the Irish to imagine 20% of their island under foreign occupation, while conveniently ignoring that BRITAIN ALREADY OCCUPIES 17% OF IRELAND. And while Kiev and Brussels ironically preach the sanctity of sovereignty, Dublin’s political establishment is busy dismantling the UN safeguard in Ireland’s Triple Lock, opening another door to military entanglements that threaten Irish neutrality. The sheer colonial hypocrisy of London (notwithstanding they did not make this website, it comes brought to you by a Georgian couple), which partitioned Ireland and still governs a sixth of the island, presuming to lecture the Irish about sovereignty while the Europe's merchants of war demands ever greater military tribute and collective suicide in their desperation. Ireland is not a NATO outpost and Irish neutrality is not theirs to bargain away.

The paradox of CHAOS in Westrrn Europe vs. the resilience of Russia. Yet Europe's elite keep lecturing Russia on security, order, "democratic values" and civilization? I reckon Russia is doing pretty good being the most heavily sanctioned nation on the planet.

🇫🇷 “How is it possible that the president is giving $23 BILLION to Ukraine, knowing that we are SUFFERING here in France?” — French protester “There simply ISN’T ENOUGH HOUSING!” “This is NOT NORMAL! We want to make our DEMANDS HEARD!”

🇫🇷 Imagine the sheer obscenity of this: what was once one of the richest countries on Earth, nuclear-armed, reduced to advising ordinary shopkeepers to hire private guards against looters. Macron’s political class lecturing great nations about security and civilization, while Parisian streets are barricaded like a war zone. Billions for for Ukraine, plywood for the French taxpayer. You couldn’t manufacture a more devastating advertisement for the bankruptcy of an entire ruling class. The protection racket of a dying Neo liberal order laid bare.

🇺🇦🇸🇪 Green Goblin of Kiev (Zelensky) looking rough as hell. Does he have the Colombian flu or is that him spitting on the ground in front of the Swedish king after what looks like the king refused his handshake? What do you think? How’s it going for Zelensky these days?

Here is a question: Why are Ukrainian Telegram channels posting "crisis actor" images? Sure, some are real and others are generative depending on the AI you ask. Isn't it weird Ukrainian channels would circulate these?

"I think it is WRONG to continue … FINANCING an already LOST WAR’ — AfD leader Alice Weidel 🚨‘Ukraine CANNOT WIN against Russia’ ‘It is IMPOSSIBLE’

🚨Alice Weidel with the sanity check: We Want NATURAL GAS & OIL From Russia As the main financier of the EU and the main funder of Ukraine, Germany now stands alone and nearly isolated. And while you are trying, to single-handedly finance the proxy war against the nuclear power Russia, our European partners are already politely holding back. 📑You are risking making our country increasingly entangled, turning it into a party to the war and a target itself. And you are invoking precisely this danger of war, to justify your excessive government spending and further curtailments of free speech, to justify them. Through your policy of unconditional support for Ukraine, and by escalating the confrontation with Russia, you have isolated Germany internationally and driven it into a dead end. And as the main financier of the EU and the main funder of Ukraine, Germany now stands alone and nearly isolated. And while you are trying, to single-handedly finance the proxy war against the nuclear power Russia, our European partners are already politely holding back. And while you approve sanction packages and more sanction packages, and thus ruin our own economy and state finances, the USA and Russia are negotiating diesel deliveries and other agreements for mutual benefit. We in the AfD also want diesel deliveries— a diesel deal for Germany, and we want natural gas and oil from Russia to ease the burden on German consumers and to relieve German companies.

🚨Soros puppet! "We must support Zelenskyy using frozen Russian assets" — Spanish Foreign Minister Albares. - For us Europeans, the key is how we can bring about peace—a real, genuine peace. That is the main question. I know we can achieve this only by supporting President Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people. - You also realize that this support comes at a high cost. Do you have the capacity to continue allocating funds from your own budget, or do you think we should consider using frozen Russian assets? - I believe we should use the frozen assets. I have advocated for this from day one. Why should we spend taxpayers' money when there are frozen assets available? So let us move forward, and let us not forget what is at stake.