Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams) profile picture

Former Indeed CEO. Responsible AI advocate. @HustonTillotson University Board Trustee/Lecturer. @GuardrailsNow Board Member.

Austin, TX
Joined September 2007
Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)Photo by Chris Hyams (he/him) (@hyams)
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
The Anti-A.I. Money Strikes Back puck.news/ai/2026/10/pro-ai-… To build on this: @GuardrailsNow didn’t come close to matching them $ for $- and we didn’t need to. We brought labor, progressive orgs and the 80% of people in every state who think AI CEOs shouldn’t meddle in elections
6
13
1,282
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
V interesting stuff from former VP at Meta, Brian Boland, arguing to delay/stop the AI IPOs talks about the profit incentives the minute the bell rings if you care about AI safety, you should care about this delta-fund.org/you-have-days…
1
2
7
971
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
AGs are pledging to rein in big tech-- because it's hugely popular, they want to win, and they recognize they have a critical lever of power. "Half the contests include campaign ads from incumbents touting how they fought tech companies or from challengers pledging to do so"
This election top cops have a new campaign message: pick me to sue Big Tech. 15 of the 30 state attorneys general have ads touting fights with industries from social media & AI to data centers -- all in hopes of connecting with affordability voters. news.bloomberglaw.com/litiga…
2
3
461
Anyone concerned that a reckless race to AGI is bad for AI safety and ethics should be deeply concerned about the pending frontier lab IPOs. If they go forward, the current race will look quaint by comparison. A public company's stock is worth zero today if the company will not be worth more in the future. The relentless grind of quarterly earnings will make it impossible to pause growth and focus on safety. The race to AGI is gas on a fire. The race to AGI plus public quarterly growth targets is napalm on gas on the fire.
16
94
6
594
98,834
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
Dolores Huerta's leadership was everything. Never failed to show up when asked; didn't need credit but is owed it. I first met DH during the ACA fight in '09. She gave us clarity about centering people + how that should translate to policy. Grateful to her for showing us the way.
BREAKING: Labor leader, feminist and civil rights icon Dolores Huerta has died at 96. apnews.com/article/dolores-h…
2
4
189
Yesterday, friends and loved ones gathered in Austin to remember and honor @JoshuaBaer. I was heartbroken to miss the gathering. I knew and loved Josh for 27 years. I first met him when we hired him at Trilogy in 1999. Trilogy’s new college hires were famously full of intellectual curiosity and seemingly boundless energy, but Josh stood out even among that class. He vibrated on a different frequency. He had a confidence that was easy to misread as arrogance, but he was so goofy and lovable that most everyone was charmed. He was a perpetual motion machine of big ideas. Josh always believed there was something better just around the corner. But even in his youth, he had not a whiff of competitiveness. Josh wanted everyone to win. This was a theme for the rest of his life. No one who met Josh could ever mistake his will to win for a desire to “beat” anyone. Sadly, this is a trait missing in much of our industry. But Josh was a player / cheerleader for team humanity. It was clear early on that Trilogy was not big enough for Josh. He needed to be free from bureaucracy, rules, or restrictions of any kind. He needed to lead the way, to cut his own path through the jungle. He was gone in a year. To love Josh was also to occasionally scratch your head at Josh. In the early days of Twitter, Josh innocently posted that he had to drive his “backup” Porsche because the fan belt light came on in his main Porsche. This got the attention of a new site called tweetingtoohard.com which featured Josh as the #1 most obnoxious tweet on Twitter. Most people in Josh’s position are extremely thin-skinned, and would either go on an all-out offensive, or shrivel up and hide if called out. Josh thought this was hilarious. He was happy to be the butt of a joke, and laughed along with everyone else. But he was not thick-skinned, either. He was genuinely open-hearted, and as far as I ever saw, never had hatred for anyone. And of course he kept tweeting about the cars. Once Josh experienced financial success, he started investing in other entrepreneurs. I was extremely fortunate to have Josh as one of the first seed investors in my startup, B-Side, back in 2006. He was an incredible supporter, and an invaluable advisor. He invested again in a follow-on Series A round. I appreciated all of this of course, but what was more meaningful was the support Josh provided when B-Side ran out of runway and shut down in 2010. Josh lost *all* of his investment. In the 15+ years since, he only ever expressed gratitude for being a part of the journey. We became even closer after that experience. This is not typical behavior from investors when you lose all their money, trust me on this. But of course Josh was not typical. When Josh started Capital Factory, he clearly found his true calling. All of his energy, ideas, love and support for community, love and gratitude for Austin, the ability to cheer, to sell, to get people on board, to celebrate their success, to hold them in their stumbles — it all found fertile soil in CF. Much has been written about the impact of CF on Austin, but no matter how much hyperbole has been lavished on Josh, it’s honestly all understated. To be clear, there is no Austin as a global tech powerhouse without Josh Baer. Lots of people came and built and did what we could, but Josh put Austin on the map, and then made the map bigger and bigger. There is no part of the city that his legacy does not touch, no one working in or adjacent to tech that doesn’t have Josh to thank. After I joined Indeed in 2010, Josh became our biggest cheerleader. He had no actual skin in the game, but of course he had skin in the game because he wanted everyone to win. He wanted Austin to win. Josh had an incredible admiration for Indeed’s co-founder Rony Kahan, and the admiration was mutual. I’m sure everyone has heard the story at this point, but it bears retelling. In 2011, a small group of Indeed employees went to SXSW, and we decided we needed a t-shirt. Our UX lead at the time, Chris Garcia, had a scribble in his notebook that said, “I help people find jobs.” We changed the “find” to “get,” and Indeed’s “I help people get jobs” shirt was born. Rony loved Josh’s entrepreneurial evangelism — his tireless advocacy for people to take risks, leave their jobs, and start something new. Rony went and had a custom shirt made that he presented to Josh: “I help people quit jobs.” To Josh, this shirt was the greatest compliment imaginable — one entrepreneur to another. The shirt, and the phrase, were a sort of talisman for Josh. His LinkedIn and X profile pictures have him wearing that shirt, grinning, and pointing with both index fingers at the text. His bio on both platforms starts with “I help people quit jobs.” I loved watching every minute of Josh’s growth into the extraordinary man he was. A Buddhist teacher once told me that the spiritual journey is primarily the transformation from self-centered to other-centered. At some point in his life, Josh had the realization that takes many people a lifetime — if ever — that our purpose in life is to be helpful to others. He dedicated himself to this mission with an urgency and commitment that is truly one of a kind. The same teacher told me, “practice as if your hair was on fire.” Josh poured into the community like his hair was on fire (despite not having any). I learned so much from Josh over the years. I am grateful for all the time we spent together, and am sad for all the time we didn’t. If the past few months have shown us anything, it is that the old adage is absolutely, incontrovertibly true: people live on through the lives they touched. Josh will be around for a very, very long time. I am heartbroken to have missed the in-person community celebration and remembrance of Josh. I have been moved beyond belief by the incredible outpouring of love and compassion. I am grateful to have been part of that community in spirit. My heart is cracked wide open for Amy and the family. May Josh’s memory be a blessing.
2
2
25
3,197
“Calling for prudence, rigorous evaluation and even, at times, a slower pace in adopting AI does not mean opposing progress; instead, it is an exercise of responsible care for the human family. This need is all the more urgent given the frequent imbalance between the speed of technological growth and the slower development of awareness, norms, safeguards and institutions capable of governing its effects. It is not enough to invoke ethics in the abstract; robust legal frameworks, independent oversight, informed users and a political system that does not abdicate its responsibility are required. Otherwise, change will be governed only by technocratic thinking and presented as necessary and inevitable, ultimately imposing rules shaped by those who control data, infrastructure and computing power.” 🔥 🔥 🔥 “Magnífica Humanitas” by @Pontifex should be required reading for anyone thinking, writing, or talking about AI. And for those who are not yet thinking, writing, or talking about AI.
2
3
205
“We cannot be satisfied with merely calling for the moralization of machines—the so-called “alignment” of AI with human values—without also having the courage to insist on a further condition: the possibility of openly discussing the ethical frameworks involved and subjecting them to shared standards of social justice. Otherwise, those who control AI will impose their own moral vision, which will become the invisible infrastructure of these systems. A more moral AI is not enough if that morality is determined by a few. What is needed is a more active political involvement that is capable of slowing things down when everything is accelerating, and of protecting the opportunities for communities still to be able to participate and ask questions.”
112
“We found that the AI Super PACs were more toxic with voters than Wall Street, cryptocurrency or AIPAC,” Charles Blaettler, political director of Guardrails Alliance (@GuardrailsNow), a PAC that combats AI spending that the advocacy group is part of, told Inc. “The influence of AI money on elections and politics sits at this nexus of the anxieties that people are feeling about AI, and this increased disgust people have around corruption and special interest money and politics.”
1
3
6
281
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
This is a must-read thread by civil rights leaders @rashadrobinson and links to a letter he and others wrote to the CBC re corporate contributions, starting with Palantir, and the need for Congressional leaders to be firmly on their voters side in this crucial moment.
The Congressional Black Caucus is under attack in two ways. From the outside, racist gerrymandering is trying to wipe out its seats. From the inside, corporations are working to neutralize what it was built to do.
1
2
3
242
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
Good this is published. People deserve to know Anthropic’s aims- to write their own rules + protect their profits at the expense of public safety or benefit A lot of things wrong but a stand out is they want to protect their right to kill people in the interest of “innovation”??
5
114
3
368
11,698
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
Anti-reg AI PACs are toxic. Americans- both Rs and Ds- are united in opposition to them. Dems need to show whose side they're on. The biggest opportunity to do that is to disavow Leading the Future + commit to using oversight powers to hold Big AI accountable in the new Congress
It's actually worse than this sounds -- all $200k of new money is just interest from their bank. Zero new donations.
1
2
11
595
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
While folks are seeing the Leading the Future FEC filing and saying "this thing is cooked", a friendly reminder that the threat of anti-reg AI industry spending in election is a live wire for candidates. If it wasn't, we'd be seeing every candidate in both parties denouncing them
1
1
1
5
1,124
I don’t agree with all of the @nytimes suggestions here, but this is a great way to demystify AI regulation. The anti-regulatory forces want to keep the discussion as vague and high level as possible — “it slows innovation,” “you don’t want to cure cancer,” “China will take over the world.” When we can break it down to concrete questions like this, it is simpler for everyone to envision how regulation is not just helpful but absolutely necessary. Link in comments.
1
1
141
AI companies claim they are curing cancer and bringing about a future of abundance. But you can learn a lot by listening to everything they say, not just the utopia part. OpenAI's own definition of AGI is "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work." That sounds a lot more like dystopia to me.
Why do people hate AI money in politics and not trust AI companies? Maybe because the companies themselves are telling us their product will take our jobs. Our spokesperson former Indeed CEO Chris @hyams lays out what OpenAI's mission is in their own words.
1
8
1
13
558
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
Second tactic: unleash a tsunami of misleading ads. The billionaires have already spent $230 million. Sergey Brin alone has spent $138 million. @patrickc : $20 million. @ericschmidt : $15 million. It is one of the most expensive campaigns in U.S. history. The billionaires have reserved nearly $100 million worth of advertising, compared with roughly $100,000 for supporters of the tax. And they are nowhere near finished. Voting begins today—80% of Californians vote by mail—and runs through November 3, Election Day for the midterms. The advertising tsunami will only intensify between now and then.
8
135
8
507
33,735
Chris Hyams (he/him) retweeted
Exactly this. OpenAI might be retreating from a [failed] political play to buy an anti-regulation Congress, but they'e done nothing to earn public trust. All serious 2028 candidates should take a public stand with 80% of voters who oppose anti-reg AI election spending immediately
OpenAI might say that they’re done spending hundreds of millions on elections to block regulation - but we shouldn’t take them at their word on this. We need politicians in both parties to disavow this spending, and we need to keep putting pressure on OpenAI to follow their promise. politico.com/news/2026/10/05…
1
3
197