Courtney Marchesani

The photo was sent to me two years ago. I was asked if I knew the man in the photo since I was at the same conference. I made posts about this saga earlier this year you can find them on my timeline. I asked who wanted to know. I was told it was a journalist. I held onto the photo and that spring when I was in NYC I showed the photo to one of the conference organizers. He said it was Jonathan Grey. I held onto this information for a while as the woman who sent the photo was concerned about the "journalist" who was asking about Jonathan Grey. Later that summer (2024), I shared with her it was Jonathan Grey. Over the next two years she would share information intermittently. The man who originally asked wasn't a journalist. Then he supposedly lost his job...she suspected he was intelligence. Then later, the story kept changing and he'd lost his job due to drug use. The whole thing was off. Last fall, she finally told me who the "journalist" was. I knew him. I confronted him and said it would look very bad for him if it came to light he was trying to find out who a federal whistleblower was. He said all the things that had been said about him were not true. We met up in person last (Virginia, November) fall to suss everything out. He told me our mutual friend had said, "I was a danger to myself and others." He also told me he met Jonathan Grey personally. In the bar after the conference with several others. Grey said that the program was like the show Dark. That Leslie knew all of this. He also said he was told by Jay Christopher King that the guy was a plant. He wasn't the real Jonathan Grey (the true source in The Debrief article) and that Leslie knew that too. So that's the history. Which I documented before on my timeline.

Photos from a beautiful week with family

Jonathan Grey

Missoula market

In response to characterization of my experiences in recent spaces, I think it's important to establish a factual timeline rather than dismiss someone's concerns as irrational. Fall 2023 – Pennsylvania: While staying at my mother's rural property, I observed an unusual light repeatedly shifting between amber and red near the surrounding woods. I documented the incident on Spaced Out Radio that same night. 2024 – Pennsylvania: I returned to collect my mother's belongings. The very night I left, our renters experienced a break-in, which they reported to police. 2024 – Pennsylvania: Our renters encountered an unidentified man with a cellphone near the pond. One renter fired warning shots into the water, retreated to a vehicle, and contacted police. 2024 – Nicole Sakatch's home: While investigating the Amy Eskridge case, an unfamiliar man arrived shortly after I did, approached Nicole claiming he could reduce her electricity costs, became abusive, and prompted a call to police. October 2025 – Montana: An intruder was inside my home. November 2025 – Montana: A vehicle ran over our electrical power box, interrupting power to the house. These are incidents I experienced or that were reported to me by witnesses. Several involved law enforcement, and some have documentation. I am not claiming to know who was responsible, nor am I asserting that these incidents are connected. But there is a meaningful difference between questioning someone's interpretation of events and dismissing the events themselves. Skepticism is healthy. Ridicule is not an investigation. I welcome evidence-based questions, not personal attacks.

"Dulles remarked about understand- ing alleged Soviet mind-control techniques: “We, in the West, are somewhat handicapped in getting all the details. (…) [W]e have no human guinea pigs, ourselves, on which to try out these extraordinary techniques.”1 “the research potential represented by a group of 142 criminal-sexual psychopaths confined at the Ionia State Hospital.”9 However, as experiments were to include “individuals at all social levels, high and low, native American and foreign,”10 CIA operatives resorted to the covert cultivation of tar- gets and established safehouses for “the observation of effects of substances on selected test individuals.”11 Many of the people experimented upon were unaware of what was happening to them and suffered catastrophic, sometimes lifelong, consequences" "Moreover, brain-computer interfaces are becoming increas- ingly effective at decoding the sensory perceptions of their wearers. While researchers were initially able only to extract features like contours or colours from the neural responses evoked by perceived visual stimuli,33 more recent devices can even reconstruct perceived faces.34 The next step will be the decoding of mental imagery, that is, of scenes not actual- ly seen but merely imagined.35" "More recently, in 2011, the Defense Advanced Research Proj- ects Agency (DARPA), a research body of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) tasked with the development of military technologies, subcontracted researchers at Arizona State University to carry out a project with the aim of exploring the neuropsychology of narrative and persuasion. The proj- ect’s findings were to help “the United States government to convince world populations of its good intentions, and to dissuade key constituencies from the powerful narratives told by violent extremists.”46 To this end, scientists were sup- posed to “generate the knowledge to effectively understand, model, and disrupt narratives (…) on a neurological level, and the capability to induce powerful narrative phenom- ena (…) with certainty.”47 The researchers planned to use Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation – a non-invasive method of brain stimulation based on electromagnetic induction – to “selectively alter aspects of narrative structure and brain functioning (…) to induce or disrupt selective features of nar- rative processing.”48 25_Meier_01.pdf share.google/vXJ9fxOR4HpRiI2…

From CIRI "Congratulations to UAA: University of Alaska Anchorage and Professor Kimberly Pace on offering one of the nation's first university courses dedicated to the Missing and Murdered Indigenous People (#MMIP) crisis. ❤️ Through discussions with researchers, advocates, legal experts & community leaders, students are learning about the complex factors behind the crisis and the efforts underway to advance awareness, justice and healing. 🖤 The course also highlights the work of organizations and leaders helping address the crisis in Alaska, including CIRI Shareholder Charlene Apok (Inupiaq), executive director of Data for Indigenous Justice, whose research has helped document MMIP cases and inform conversations about systemic solutions. ❤️ We applaud UAA's commitment to educating future leaders and fostering greater understanding of an issue that continues to affect Indigenous communities across Alaska and beyond." 🖤 Read more: yahoo.com/news/us/articles/m…