atom (@itisparmanu) header
atom (@itisparmanu) profile picture

Den of Paje²t Shresth • @itisatom

Joined June 2026
Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)Photo by atom (@itisparmanu)
Kaali Maa Raksha Karein
1
11
37
1,959
Most intelligent Leftist They even skip taking a bath just to assert their freedom & they've a reason for it too – Not taking bath saves atleast half an hour which helps them to lifemaxxx and get naturally selected Visionary IndianLeftie Paje²ts 🫡
for me, eating meat is my resistance against brahminism and purism. it’s my way of asserting that im free from religious shackles and i can eat whatever i want.
2
13
287
atom retweeted
Bengalis are much more closer to kanglus on the other side, than they are to maithilis- culturally, genetically & phenotypically. Bhangalis should have some self-respect & stop finding similarlities with maithilis & go do same to same with their ethnic brothers. 1/n
12
3
2
59
3,877
Why does India seem so allergic to the idea of men being attractive or having sex appeal as part of its soft power? Why is male beauty and charisma almost never treated as something worth showcasing?
Imagine having her as the MEA spokesperson instead of that Caloriejeet Randhir Jaiswal. It would improve India's image on the global stage by at least 15%.
2
19
1
98
1,999
What's the point of posting this? Superstition existed everywhere. The Dufferin Bridge incident dates back to the 1800s, nah? In 1883, clergymen in Brighton, England - opposed streetcars as the "work of the devil" and electricity as an Obscure evil force. (1/2)
This was the reaction of Brahmins when British were building dufferin Bridge over Ganges at Benares :
1
22
1
51
1,050
AASI has unmatched aura Dance Credits : @marinebharat Video Credits : Me
12
17
2
125
2,961
Superstitious beliefs were not limited to Brahmins alone. Pre-industrial Europe also had its own share of superstitions, and scholars like Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei were punished because of their theories contradicting specific Catholic doctrines of the time btw.
This was the reaction of Brahmins when British were building dufferin Bridge over Ganges at Benares :
6
4
2
96
3,368
This is what happened when a Majhail Baman marched into Multan. Proper shuddhikaran of Pakjabis👇
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
4
6
41
1,895
Never stopped
Ppl really gonna start worshipping the sun again, huh?
16
659
1
6,272
53,625
How right wing twitter describes Vishnu in 2026:
Got kicked out. Parents didnt want me to go to mass but I decided otherwise. Please pray for me
32
407
13
4,074
56,344
There's nothing to hate about AASI We all have it & should embrace it
The most cringe thing about Indologists n so called Vedic traditionalists is: they defend AASI, it's the most Anti Vedic dna, More the AASI more you're going genetically far from Rishi Munis. We have data of Ancestral North Indian but not Painted ware still ANI is closest proxy.
9
16
1
104
2,430
every caste gathering to troll aarushiydv is the best sight to watch on x[dot]com
3
23
522
Bursted crackers myself & now I'll tweet about AQI Happy Diwali Frens 🎇
3
6
81
1,704
He's an all-weather ally of Gangu Land. His sheer presence has teleported many Marathi kangers into the realm of sodomy, where the Bihari devil does nothing but sodomize them.
1
6
134
Replying to @GeorgeUnltd
North Indians were actually taller than Brits on average until about 1900s or so. The British accounts of Gangetic/NW Indian soldiers can be almost borderline homosexual, "dashing tanned dapper fellows wearing turbans and carrying muskets, resembling of the ancient Aryan race that settled n sheeit" (Ian Hamilton), Charles Napier said something like "brawny bronzed Grenadier with broad deep chests".
25
114
8
1,630
57,228
Bhimrao was 21 when he impregnated his 13yo old wife, ramabai. Bhimrao kept on impregnating her until she eventually passed away, after she was gone, he instantly ditched her and married another woman. I reject the idea of this guy being the chairman of Constitution's drafting committee.
Dr. Ambedkar rejected the idea of portraying Rama as Maryada Purushottam on moral grounds, citing five controversial incidents in the Ramayana: 1. The killing of Vali – Rama killed Vali by attacking him from behind while he was fighting Sugriva. 2. Sita’s Agni Pariksha – Rama subjected Sita to a trial by fire to prove her purity. 3. Abandoning pregnant Sita – Rama sent his pregnant wife into exile in the forest. 4. Sita’s final ordeal – Sita ultimately returned to the earth rather than continue living under such humiliation. 5. The killing of Shambuka – Rama killed Shambuka for performing penance, according to the Uttara Kanda. From the standpoint of morality and justice, Rama cannot be regarded as a God or an ideal man.
122
2,196
30
12,390
355,209
This quoted post is unavailable.
6
46
885
Most awaited diwali media dropped 😻🎇
Shubh deepawali 🪔
3
6
64
1,884
Brahmins doing soshan abroad
Urges, we need to organise ourselves and fight against this agressively #JusticeForSahil
3
4
39
889
Y'all maybe pro-queer coz of all inclusiveness but I'm pro-queer coz being gay/lesbo/non-binary means no children & TFR goes brrr 📉 - Paje²t Groyper
5
211