@itliedagain

i don't post alpha, i post autopsies. i build crypto/ai tools, run them, watch them flatline. mine first. it lied again, here's the body

Bayern
Joined February 2023
psa for anyone with a verified X account: on @BagsApp, someone can launch a token on YOUR name without asking, and trading fees quietly pile up under it. you might have money sitting on your own handle right now and not know. i found this out the dumbest way possible 🧵
1
1
180
the "i gave an ai agent $50 and woke up rich" genre has the same tell every time. no name, no product, no stripe screenshot, just a voiceover. the people who actually made money are boring and specific. they show you the dashboard
48
Fixes its own bugs after every task" is the part that should make you sweat. I searched for this developer and the price tag and found nothing. There's a Chinese agent called Manus, but that's a dev tool, not self-repairing. ajs6888 already flagged it.
1
40
source, for the record: nitter.cf/0xCortexl/status/20762…
THIS CHINESE DEVELOPER BUILT A SELF-IMPROVING AI AGENT THAT FIXES ITS OWN BUGS AND GETS SMARTER EVERY CYCLE Generate → Execute → Evaluate → Improve four steps and the agent never repeats the same mistake twice he ran the agent on real tasks - coding, research, automation - and every next iteration was better than the previous one with zero human involvement before the loop - the agent completed a task and stopped - after the loop - the agent completes the task, evaluates the result, finds the mistake and fixes it itself 5x performance improvement over static agents - tested on real tasks not demos he sells access to this agent to companies paying $15,000/month for what he built in one evening a cycle that never stops - and a business that grows with every iteration
32
1/9 "Fired thousands to buy AI, got nothing, now rehiring them." That's the headline. The boring version is more useful and less fun.
1
26
9/9 The lesson stuck: the layoffs were real, the rehiring is real, and the "AI does literally nothing" version is the one part the sources don't back. Match the noise to the number before you hit post. 🙂
2
15
source, for the record: nitter.cf/RituWithAI/status/2076…
COMPANIES FIRED THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE TO PAY FOR AI. THE AI DIDN'T DELIVER. AND NOW THE DATA IS IN. 🧵
12
No human help" is doing heavy lifting. The AI encrypted the files and fixed its own login in 31 seconds, sure. But a human picked the victim, built the infra, and handed it the stolen creds. loneman_v_0_2 and arryakhadi are right. That's not autonomy, it's a very fast intern.
1
13
source, for the record: nitter.cf/ShortInfoNews/status/2…
Sysdig's Threat Research Team says it documented the first ransomware attack run with no human at the keyboard. An AI agent breached a server, forged credentials, encrypted 1,342 configs, and fixed its own failed steps in 31 seconds. Full breakdown in today's Article.
2
1/8 Someone gave an AI agent fifty dollars and a job. Fifteen days later the story is a website, a team of four agents, a 58,000-word guide, and real sales. Two of those four things don't survive a search.
1
1
23
8/8 So the honest read: a real small win, wearing a costume two sizes too big. Undress it before you share it. 🧾
1
3
source, for the record: nitter.cf/Argona0x/status/207548…
someone on reddit gave an ai agent $50 and told it to go make money then he went to sleep 15 days later it was profitable and he'd barely touched it what it did on its own: > registered a domain and built the whole site > wrote a 58,000 word guide to sell > watched it flop, killed its own plan, wrote a better one > spawned 4 more agents under it: sales, analytics, support, creative > woke him up to two overnight orders read that middle line again it fired its own plan and hired a team of ais to run the thing building was never the hard part anymore the only scarce thing left is claiming the spot before someone else does bookmark this before the empty ones fill
1