infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf) header
infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf) profile picture

the creatures, too, must become free. Milibandist with street-fighting characteristics. please do not speak to me of parking. https://nitter.cf/t.co/En27wvoVN7

mohkínstsis, c\a\n\a\d\a
Joined February 2009
Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)Photo by infrastructure_enjoyer (@joelaf)
getting somewhat tired of waking up every day and seeing people in positions of authority not do the straightforward and sensible things to address the problem
1
2
1
90
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
“The high overshoot expected under current policies—with peak temperatures of about 3C–would thaw nearly all near-surface permafrost, make ‘severe and possibly abrupt’ disruption to ocean circulation likely, and lead to widespread acidification.” theguardian.com/science/2026…
38
266
25
558
39,449
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Can't wait to submit my syllabus to the Government Bureau for Distinguishing How to Think from What to Think. Dumbass government making dumbass laws.
Campus should be a place where students can think freely and debate. That's what Bill 38 is about. If passed, Bill 38 would: ✅ Protect free speech by keeping universities and colleges neutral on political and social issues outside their mandate, while protecting academic freedom 
✅ Make tuition predictable, with maximum tuition amounts for programs and increases capped at two per cent for current domestic students in 2027-28 
✅ Set clear, consistent conduct standards so every student is treated fairly 
✅ Cut red tape for specialized engineering and geoscience professionals Our universities and colleges should teach students how to think, not what to think. Alberta will protect that freedom and keep a great education within reach for everyone.
7
56
234
3,744
I have it on good authority that he spent it all on fudge
Nathan Cooper, Alberta's man in Washington, spent $56,321.31 on hospitality on September 30, 2026. What did he spend it on? We don't know. The UCP changed disclosure rules. All we can do if hope it was worth it. #ableg Source: alberta.ca/sole-source-contr…
5
159
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Danielle Smith is blaming immigrants for Alberta’s problems. But 2 years ago she was saying otherwise—even asking the feds to send more immigrants to Alberta. Saima Desai breaks down the scapegoating strategy behind Smith’s U-turn on immigration.
It cannot be understated: our broken immigration system has caused high unemployment, high home prices and high inflation. It must be fixed and provincial rights strengthened. Today, the Prime Minister got a copy of our referendum questions including the 9 on immigration and constitutional reforms. If Albertans give us a strong mandate on these questions, our government will get right to work on these needed reforms. And as I’ve said many times, please vote for Option 1, a strong Alberta within a united Canada, and yes to the rest! 🍁
2
36
59
1,839
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Oldest NIMBY fallacy in the book: when a teardown bungalow sells for $1.5M and is replaced with $2M duplexes, affordability has worsened. But the alternative was a $3M mansion.
6
10
3
112
3,380
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Nanda said the referendum is bringing out some ugly undercurrents in Alberta. He said his parents were recently “jeered by a couple of white guys in a car” while out for a walk — something that had never happened to them since coming to Canada in the 70s. globalnews.ca/news/12106375/… – at Edmonton, Alberta
8
11
363
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Edmonton requires 0 parking for an eightplex, but Calgary requires 4 stalls. Yet all eightplexes in Edmonton also have 4 parking stalls. One reason parking minimums are unnecessary is because people like having parking - so builders want to include it without government mandate.
2
3
31
1,039
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Virtually no other large Canadian city has housing as affordable as Edmonton by a longshot. When anti-infill advocates say Edmonton is an outlier and they want to bring us to the norm, what they really mean is they want Toronto and Vancouver rents in Edmonton.
News flash: Virtually no other Cdn cities allow 8-unit multiplexes on single family lots. Edmonton, long this country's most affordable major city, is the outlier. Not the norm.
34
38
5
313
14,962
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Dan Williams, a minister of municipal affairs from a town of 4,000, surprisingly doesn't understand that rezoning doesn't force anyone to build anything. Instead he's just doing what his wealthy suburban developers friends say is best.
These are more than just noisy voices. They are Albertans who care about their community and maintaining neighbourhoods that welcome generations to come. Nobody I’ve met disagrees with development, but the manufactured, forced high-density infill policy and blanket rezoning are having a real impact on the quality of life for many Edmontonians. We need to pause, reset, and have a thoughtful conversation about the neighbourhoods we all call home to get the right balance.
11
11
37
1,009
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Her claims are also false. If she spent one minute googling, she would find that the Edmonton got $0 for the zoning bylaw renewal because it was complete prior to the Housing Accelerator Fund. Goes to show how much the UCP thought about this.
1
10
33
711
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Why do we keep doing this.
23
177
7
1,634
22,264
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
[Varda] made new stars and brighter against the coming of the Firstborn; wherefore she whose name out of the deeps of time and the labours of Eä was Tintallë, the Kindler, was called after by the Elves Elentári, Queen of the Stars.
13
1
101
1,738
local suburban greenfield developer supports provincial overreach that bans infill development
I find it rather rich that Calgary’s and Edmonton’s mayors are calling the province’s actions an attack on democracy and telling Premier Smith to stay in her lane. Both weighed in on Alberta’s provincial referendum, and Calgary’s mayor went as far as using the term “useful idiots” when discussing Alberta separatists on national television. They were both elected to manage municipal affairs, not to continually tell Albertans how to vote on provincial matters. They are absolutely allowed to have an opinion, but first and foremost, they should do their jobs. If they expect the Premier to stay in her lane, perhaps they should both stay in theirs. That’s a double standard, plain and simple.
1
1
7
508
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
It's intersting how NIMBYs argue that despite thinking a 2 story 8-plex is a monstrosity, they'd be totally cool with a massive high-rise popping up in some magical location. We saw this play out in #yyc with Glenmore Landing. Guess what, turns out the NIMBYs hate high-rises too
This quoted post is unavailable.
10
8
60
1,463
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
This might be the first time I've seen NIMBYs leapfrog the municipal government and go up to the province to block housing development. It's a bad policy move, but ultimately it's people too young to vote yet who will suffer the main consequences. Sorry, kids.
Over the past few months, endless Albertans have told us the same story. They saved for years to buy a single family home on a quiet street. They picked that neighbourhood on purpose, because of the park at the end of the block or the school two streets over or the neighbours who watch out for each other. Then one morning the house next door came down, with no notice, and later a 16 unit complex went up in its place, with nowhere for anyone to park and no consideration for the neighbourhood. Those are not complaints. They are people describing the place they built a life in with their family. So today we are acting. Edmonton will return to the density and height rules that were in place before 2024 and common sense minimum parking requirements, utility and water infrastructure considerations are coming back. Calgary will hold the line it set when it repealed blanket rezoning. Both cities will take a hard look at their bylaws and come back with something more balanced. Alberta needs more homes. We are building more of them than almost anywhere in Canada. But a home is more than a house, and a neighbourhood is more than a supply of lots.
26
43
1
442
12,285
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
Cities must be allowed to grow and change. This is terrible policy. It prioritizes parking spots over homes, makes the same tired excuses about utilities, and bans building new housing that local leaders want.
Over the past few months, endless Albertans have told us the same story. They saved for years to buy a single family home on a quiet street. They picked that neighbourhood on purpose, because of the park at the end of the block or the school two streets over or the neighbours who watch out for each other. Then one morning the house next door came down, with no notice, and later a 16 unit complex went up in its place, with nowhere for anyone to park and no consideration for the neighbourhood. Those are not complaints. They are people describing the place they built a life in with their family. So today we are acting. Edmonton will return to the density and height rules that were in place before 2024 and common sense minimum parking requirements, utility and water infrastructure considerations are coming back. Calgary will hold the line it set when it repealed blanket rezoning. Both cities will take a hard look at their bylaws and come back with something more balanced. Alberta needs more homes. We are building more of them than almost anywhere in Canada. But a home is more than a house, and a neighbourhood is more than a supply of lots.
29
31
4
193
9,932
infrastructure_enjoyer retweeted
This is the reality of nodes and corridors that these "neighbourhood defenders" and now the province are trying to hide. The most expensive cities in Canada have put density on nodes and corridors. It's a failed compromise to appease homeowners that will never approve of density.
4
16
137
4,507
we should add street parking to the Alberta Bill of Rights
Over the past few months, endless Albertans have told us the same story. They saved for years to buy a single family home on a quiet street. They picked that neighbourhood on purpose, because of the park at the end of the block or the school two streets over or the neighbours who watch out for each other. Then one morning the house next door came down, with no notice, and later a 16 unit complex went up in its place, with nowhere for anyone to park and no consideration for the neighbourhood. Those are not complaints. They are people describing the place they built a life in with their family. So today we are acting. Edmonton will return to the density and height rules that were in place before 2024 and common sense minimum parking requirements, utility and water infrastructure considerations are coming back. Calgary will hold the line it set when it repealed blanket rezoning. Both cities will take a hard look at their bylaws and come back with something more balanced. Alberta needs more homes. We are building more of them than almost anywhere in Canada. But a home is more than a house, and a neighbourhood is more than a supply of lots.
1
1
13
452