John Weeast

Hmmm, What's the first word in Temporary Protective Status?

Satan knows our name, but calls us by our sin.... Jesus knows our sin, but calls us by our name.

Can you give me a definition of the word Temporary....

Child and slave labor... that's they key. Always has been.

Supremacy Clause... idjits keep speaking nonsense.

Reposting is a feature, not subject to copyright law. But keep posting this... it's hilarious. And yes, the authorities know.....how much of an idiot you are. They're laughing too.

Or you can buy a pound of sliced Turkey and Cheese for $7 and have sandwiches for a month. If you choose the fast food option, you're not managing your money well.

It's mind boggling that the inability of battery technology goes over these people's heads. Yes, we have batteries. Those batteries can't capture everything generated without infrastructure that would take up so much space, it would be infeasible to do so. You think windmills are an eyesore? Imagine acres upon acres of battery storage plants. And that would only handle a small local area. Where are cities going to find the space? The ONLY cost efficient means to do so would be to attach batteries to every house, which would effectively take every homeowner off the grid. Even this is inefficient due to using more than you can store over the course of a year due to weather/not optimal sun days. If you do that, you're doing the opposite of creating the infrastructure to power everyone else. It's not a failure because it doesn't work, it's a failure because it's a cost-sink that isn't feasible with current battery technology.

Claiming a sexy & hot woman is facist (because she's sexy and hot) is not the way to attract men back to the democrat party.

Trust requires honesty, transparency, and accountability. What's been lacking the most has been accountability, so if Media and Government want trust back, they'll have to be held accountable for what they've done. Exposing alone does nothing.

Hilarious that a "legal analyst" can't think of how giving a person guilty of egregious crimes in order to name other people guilty of egregious crimes would be worthy of consideration. Automatically jumps to coverup instead of finding more information.... analyst my ass.

But we were told they weren't on healthcare...

This is bullshit. He specifically said to be peaceful and to stop what you were doing. He never told you to enter the Capitol. Stop trying to pass blame for your own actions. Stop trying to say you refused to say he gave you orders insinuating you lied to protect him.

Defending slave labor by children working the fields is not the 1865 Democrat rehash I was expecting in 2025. "Newscum" is too polite a name

Here's why the "da guvment has more powa" arguments don't work. When drones are used overseas, the operators are here. When we're here and they're here and there families are here, we know where they are. If they're stupid enough to turn on citizens, citizens will be quick to turn on them. Tanks can't operate on our streets. The sewage lines we have in our advanced plumbing systems won't hold that weight. And they can't patrol everywhere. There's a reason we lost vietnam, iraq, afghanistan... our military sucks in guerilla warfare. Same problem British faced in the revolution. The 2a isn't a relic. Your thinking is a relic because you overlook everything that would happen if the government turned on its people. The rules are out of the window. You aren't making decisions about people on the other side of the world, you're making decisions about people who are your neighbors and can reach out and touch someone. Your fantasy isn't reality. It's ignorance of reality.

Explain the Revolutionary War Explain Vietnam Explain Iraq Explain Afghanistan The great US military (or any great military) isn't equipped to fight guerilla warfare. It would be even worse when family members of military members would be accessible to the guerilla contingent. Anyone making this argument hasn't thought out the problem to its logical conclusion.

This repeated opinion and argument is pure stupidity. Yes, being here while being here illegally itself isn't a crime, the crossing of the border illegally is a crime, as is overstaying a visa is a crime. Stating that being in the country itself isn't a crime is like saying Driving your car isn't a crime after someone drives through a stop sign. Of course driving isn't a crime, but driving through that stop sign is.

They arrested a judge..... who broke the law. What happened to "no one is above the law?" Is it rule of law or rules for thee but not for me...?

So in the last 4 years, no one fixed what they already knew was a problem?