Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip) header
Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip) profile picture

Founder @DealStreetAsia (Nikkei Group). Journalist-entrepreneur. @himangi_t's partner, blessed to be a father of two. jojiphilip at dealstreetasia dot com

Singapore
Joined April 2009
Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)Photo by Joji Philip Thomas (@jojiphilip)
For #ManU, the problem is not Carrick, but the shitty dumb players!
85
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
"His government has extended control over Supreme Court appointments, weakening the independence of the judiciary, and has cowed the once-combative Indian media with a combination of takeovers and hostile investigations. It has similarly used the state to tie political opponents in legal knots. In all, Mr Modi has abused his powers more ruthlessly and over a longer period than any other Indian leader (though Indira Gandhi did suspend democracy, after 21 months she pulled back from the brink, called elections, and was voted out.)" "In private, officials say ministers have been rattled by the way a handful of kids with smartphones have seized the agenda. They will aim to stop the youth protests gathering steam by keeping leaders in custody or tied up in the courts, and channel discontent into opposition parties, which they are more comfortable fighting".
10
86
6
243
10,538
Wait till you see SG, HK and Tokyo.. you can come back next work and continue working on your laptop and still find your wallet safe next to it…
Whenever I'm in cafés in SF, Paris or London, I just can't leave my laptop on the table and go to the restroom. I'm sure it won't be there when I'm back. Sometimes I'm even afraid to keep my phone on the table while I'm sitting there. On the other hand, here in Koramangala, HSR or Indiranagar in Bangalore, I leave my laptop and wallet on the table, go for a walk or use the restroom, only to find my things exactly where I left them. Some places back home are much safer and more trustworthy.
5
449
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
It is very funny to see the latest psyop on Indian VCs, who are probably some of the smartest and hardest working people I know, and are largely in it for the game We'd probably make twice the much money with half the effort in public equities. And I'm fresh from a weekend, so let's dive in: a) There is very little genuine risk capital in India: Everyone loves talking, and preaching about the American VC model. But we want to see American outcomes without building American capital structures. Our funds are in years 4 and 6 of their 10+1+1 lives. Our portcos are developing alternatives to petrochemicals, finding oncology drugs, running the plants of major European pharma giants using their software, and building satellites to launch into orbit. Yet, almost every conversation with an existing or prospective LP eventually brings the same question in the first 15 mins: when are you returning capital? Nobody asks if our outperformers need additional growth capital, or there's an opportunity to participate directly in their next rounds. We want deeptech built over decades, and to finance it in a way capital will be returned before the next leap year. b) The natural pools of long duration institutional capital are largely inaccessible: American university endowments and foundations have helped build an entire ecosystem of patient capital. They can underwrite illiquidity over very long periods, supporting venture firms across multiple fund cycles. Indian charitable institutions face far more restrictive investment frameworks. This matters enormously. These are precisely the pools of capital whose liabilities and investment horizons are naturally suited to financing companies that might take 10-15 years to become important businesses. We want semicon cos, new drug platforms, aerospace, and advanced manufacturing champions. But where is the domestic institutional capital structured to wait for them? LPs want capital returned before the time for even one qualification cycle and a clinical trial is over. c) Domestic tech adoption exists mostly in press releases: Every Indian company talks about innovation, digital transformation, AI and working with startups. One of our portcos has won competitive global RFPs to deploy its software across vaccine and pharma sites of global top 10 giants. But struggles to find buyers for the same technology in India. Other companies in our portfolio can get demos and paid pilots quickly in SEA and EU. But in India only manages an MOU, a press release and then 12 months of silence afterwards. Most dont want to be customers of Indian tech preferring to pay outrageous sums for foreign players. There is a remarkable reluctance to become first serious customers of indigenous tech d) Secondary liquidity is a mirage: Conversations often begin with a substantial (often 50%) discount to the last funding round, followed by requests for additional governance rights and preferential terms. Understandable for companies underperforming. But those have no market. This 50% haircut only applies to the best performers, growing rapidly. For most emerging VC portfolios, a functioning secondary market is nonexistent. A surprising no of acquisitions are really acquihires dressed up as exits. The company gets acquired, the founders, and employees move on, and investors recover little or nothing e) Running a regulated venture fund is an increasingly expensive administrative exercise: Regulatory requirements keep evolving and compliance keeps accumulating. Reporting is literally an industry of itself. And every capital call becomes another round of explaining the same portfolio updates already covered extensively in quarterly reporting. Followed, inevitably, by the question about distributions. From a fund in year 4 of a 10+1+1-year life f) And actual capital deployment is extraordinarily time consuming: A $ 1mn cheque sometimes takes 6mos from sourcing to wiring. I've previously moved more money than that in public equities with two clicks, barely giving it a second thought. Of course, the work is part of the point. In venture, we underwrite incompleteness. But it does make the economics of the job amusing *g) All of this makes venture investing a consensus game: Every participant in the ecosystem is behaving rationally from their own position. LPs want distributions, enterprises want proven vendors, secondary buyers want discounts and downside protection, regulators want accountability, and GPs need to raise their next funds Put all these together and you get an ecosystem that increasingly rewards consensus investing. Companies with visible revenues (come back when you have X cr revenue), established customers (who is buying), familiar business models (consumer), recognisable co-investors (who else is ivnesting) and clear exit pathways find capital (where else will you get capital from). The ones attempting genuinely new things, with long development cycles, unknown commercialization timelines and no obvious comparables, struggle The irony is that venture capital is supposed to be the business of underwriting things before they become obvious. But we've invariably built an ecosystem where everyone wants someone else to take the first risk, validate the technology, establish the market and preferably demonstrate an exit before they participate. As Munger said "show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome", it is visible The strange thing is that none of this changes how fascinating the underlying work is. We get to meet founders building things that should not be possibe. We get to see technologies move from labs to factories and hospitals and orbit. Sometimes we get to be a small part of making that happen. I suspect that's why so many of us stay India has no shortage of people building with extra ordinary risks. She has an acute shortage of institutions who have the willingness to finance through the timelines required to deriskUntil that changes, we'll keep trying to build 20-year companies with capital that starts asking for its money back in year 5. But we'll keep doing it anyway Apparently, we really are in it for the game
Why are Indian VCs so afraid to take risk and make money? Someone should go to India and take risk and make money. Our story - corememory.com/p/a-new-india…
28
32
24
234
42,510
What a joke! Trainers from the 80s are still used today…. Status of the so called next super power! Dream on…
#WATCH | Dundigal, Telangana: Indian Air Force chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh says, "It was really a dream come true. I started my journey with the same aircraft. I think I must be the only chief who's retiring while the basic aircraft he flew is still serving. So I think I'm very grateful. I'm very grateful to my instructor, VS Kochhar sir, who taught me flying in the beginning in this place itself. So I just wanted the circle to be complete. And I did my first sortie on 28th January, way back in 1984, in this very place with him, and today I did my last sortie in uniform with him in the same aircraft..."
1
143
That was easy!
Eğer 12’den fazlasını tanıyorsan Formula 1’i seviyor demeksin
1
156
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
Why Bill Ackman Expects a Venture Blowup Bill Ackman says AI raises the risk of disruption for every business, and that even companies that look dominant today may disappear. He expects venture capital to hit a high-profile blowup, and tells founders to raise money now but spend it as if it were their own. Pershing Square owns only highly predictable companies, keeps its team stable for years, and does not use AI to build models. Ackman is also copying Buffett's playbook at Howard Hughes, where an insurer, permanent capital and a 47% stake are meant to let him think in decades. These signals are from an interview that @shaneparrish did with Bill Ackman on @TKPPodcast (The Knowledge Project) 1. Rehab Has No Payer. Bill Ackman says brain injury care breaks down after the surgery, because nobody is paid to follow the patient's recovery. Neurosurgeons are highly compensated for operating, many hospital rehab programs are "embarrassingly inadequate," and an insurer might pay for only 6 weeks of care. The head of rehab at Mass General told him the typical surgical patient ends up in a nursing home and dies a few months later from pneumonia. Ackman thinks technology can fill the gap, starting with AI as a speech therapist where a human one can cost $500 an hour. The institute he is building focuses on brain rehab, recovery and longevity, and he wants everyone to get the benefit. He also plans real food for patients, since he calls hospital meals frightening. 2. Zero Turnover. Pershing Square's investment team has stayed the same for 9 years, apart from a few additions. Ackman says that in an industry where top people move for $100 million bonuses, a revolving door leaves you unsure whether anyone is telling you every risk. After 9 years of candor, he doesn't question anything the team tells him, and he now generates only a minority of the portfolio's ideas. That frees him to work on strategy. 3. FOMO Pricing. Ackman sees bubble-like behavior in venture. A company he met that wasn't raising was preempted two days later by an investor who put in $50 million at a $400 million valuation, and two weeks after that it raised $50 million more at $1 billion. He also saw a Series A at a $5 billion pre-money. He describes a bubble as more and more money chasing one trade out of fear of missing out, until valuations overshoot. Berkshire stock hit an all-time low in the internet bubble because Buffett sat out the boom, and Ackman says staying out depends on whether you think short-term or long-term. 4. Raise Now, Spend Carefully. Ackman calls this a great time to raise capital and tells founders not to spend it as if the money will be there forever. In the internet bubble, a weekend Barron's piece listed every public internet company's cash and its months left before zero, probably the week before the market blew up. He expects another high-profile blowup where people lose a lot of money and the market resets. Companies with years of runway will survive, and the ones that must raise in 3 months will be gone. His advice is to treat every dollar as your own. 5. Bet on the Person. In venture, Ackman weights the founder over the idea, because the original idea is often not the one that works. His best venture investment was Coupang. Bom Kim pitched the Groupon of South Korea in 2009, and Ackman thought Groupon was a bad model, but he liked Kim and his case for South Korea as a launch market. Kim built the Amazon of South Korea, which had little to do with the plan. In public markets a bad CEO can be replaced, and Ackman says the best private companies without their founder are close to a write-off. 6. Disruption Is the Risk. Ackman says an investor's most important job is assessing risk, and AI has massively increased the risk of disruption. Buffett could not see the internet coming for businesses like World Book, and Ackman says every investor is now guaranteed to look foolish on at least one business. His discipline is to predict what a company looks like 10, 20 and 30 years out, and to buy only what he'd happily own if the stock market closed for 10 years. 7. Updates in Days. The pace of AI improvement is the fastest Ackman has ever seen. Microsoft's old 1.0 to 2.0 updates took a couple of years or more, and now a consequential update arrives in days, like a Tesla updating its software overnight. He says "scare" is probably the wrong word, and he wants investors to be thoughtful about how wide a moat really is. Ackman calls predicting disruption the most complicated question an investor faces, and he expects some of the most dominant-looking businesses in the world to disappear. 8. The Library of Companies. Pershing Square holds a library of great businesses it has followed for years but couldn't buy. At 35 times earnings, for example, it is hard to reach the 20%-plus return the firm wants, so the team does the work and sets the name aside. It waits for a macro event to reprice the business. COVID gave it chances, and the "SaaS apocalypse" let it buy Microsoft at what Ackman calls a very attractive valuation, along with other high-quality businesses. 9. The Fresh-Eyes Panel. Two team members do each deep dive, starting with 10-Ks, 10-Qs and call transcripts and moving to expert networks of former employees, industry experts and competitors. They build a model of the return at today's price and present a deck. Ackman and CIO Ryan are usually not the two, but they run an independent assessment that gives them "enough information to be dangerous" to ask the right questions. The other five team members, who haven't done the work on that name, challenge the deck, and the meeting ends in a decision or a list of open issues to chase. 10. Do What Nobody Has Done. Pershing Square uses AI as a research tool and doesn't use it to build models. Ackman says that when everyone has the same access to AI it is hard to be differentiated, and what's left is outside-the-box thinking, because AI reviews everything that already happened. His best investments were things nobody had done: credit default swaps before the pandemic, the stock of a bankrupt company, and shorting AAA credit before the financial crisis. AI would not have told him to do any of them. The same logic made money going into COVID, when the firm was weeks ahead of the world on a global shutdown, and again when it bet that rates would rise on inflation. He says an asymmetric bet, a view different from everyone else's expressed through an instrument that pays far more than the capital at risk, is how you make a lot of money. 11. The Stone Tablet. After a very large loss around 2015 and 2016, Ackman had the firm's investment principles engraved on a stone tablet and put it on his desk. The checklist asks for simple, predictable, free-cash-flow-generative companies, large and liquid, run by a strong management team or one with a named replacement ready. It also lists an aversion to short selling and a requirement that asymmetric bets pay far more than the capital at work. Ackman says a checklist is a good way to avoid mistakes. 12. Asymmetry in Reverse. Ackman never liked short selling, because you can lose infinity and the most you can make is finite. Pershing Square still shorted a company it saw as a fraudulent pyramid scheme, planned to hand the FTC a detailed analysis, and felt the wind was at its back. It underestimated market dynamics when Carl Icahn bought the stock against it, and the trade turned into a hedge fund squeeze on Ackman. Shorting also costs friends: Pershing held the vast majority of the short interest, so everyone else sat on the other side, and the company had built infrastructure to attack its critics. 13. Sell When the Thesis Breaks. Pershing Square bought a meaningful Netflix stake after a subscriber miss and shared its deck with management, who agreed with the thesis and said they would never run ads. A few weeks later Netflix missed subscribers again and said it would launch an advertising model. Ackman's rule is that new information inconsistent with the thesis means you either buy a lot more because the news is immaterial or you exit because the thesis is broken. He exited, because a firm that owns only the highest-certainty companies couldn't accept a much wider range of outcomes, and moved the money into Alphabet. Netflix then executed well and its stock went back to a high multiple. When the stock was later cut in half, Pershing bought it back at a price it liked. 14. A Modern Berkshire. Ackman owns 47% of Howard Hughes and is turning it from a real estate company into an insurance holding company. Pershing Square bought the specialty insurer Vantage Holdings and recruited what Ackman calls the best management team in insurance. The model is Buffett's: hold the float in short-term treasuries to pay claims, put the rest in common stocks, and earn a profit on both underwriting and assets. With liabilities that carry a negative cost, Ackman says an insurer can generate a 20% or higher annual return. Howard Hughes is about 70% real estate and 30% insurance by capital today, and he expects 70% to 75% insurance within 5 years, funded by real estate that throws off close to $300 million of net operating income. Wall Street has wanted nothing to do with the business for 14 years, so the stock still trades at a discount to its assets. 15. Never Forced by Circumstances. Asked about Charlie Munger's remark that Berkshire was almost never forced to make decisions by circumstances, so it always had options, Ackman says Pershing Square designed its business around that. The firm holds anchor stakes in each public vehicle it runs, with employees owning 28% of Pershing Square Holdings and investing more than $500 million in Pershing Square USA. If the market panics and people want liquidity, they can sell the stock while the capital stays in the vehicle, which let the firm buy in the COVID crash and the financial crisis. Ackman says allocators pull money when a fund does well because it gets too big a share of their portfolio, and pull it when it does badly. He traces his biggest investment mistake to being distracted by raising capital for open-ended funds. If the firm compounds at anything close to its historic rate, he says it will manage a trillion dollars in 20 years.
1
1
1
6
9,301
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
Had an interesting conversation yesterday about the future of established VC firms. If you’re raising Fund IV or V, don’t own any of the major AI winners, and haven’t generated meaningful DPI, how do you raise another fund? I think we’re going to see a lot of established managers struggle to raise at their previous fund sizes. Some may have to shrink dramatically. Others may not raise again. What’s interesting is that a differentiated Fund I manager might actually have an easier story to tell than an established generalist with four funds of mediocre performance. Curious how other LPs are thinking about this.
11
6
1
75
20,926
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
Sunak’s Slap in New Delhi: China Is a Superpower, India Is the Aspirant Multipolar Reality Check: Vietnam Won ‘China+1,’ Not India Rishi Sunak stood in New Delhi, in front of India’s business elite, and said the quiet part out loud: China is now a peer competitor to the United States. Not India. For years, since the US–China trade war heated up in 2018, Indian elites have been thumping their chests, declaring India the “next economic superpower.” They told themselves that as America tried to “decouple” from China, India would be the natural replacement. Western think tanks and media fed this fantasy, calling India the “counterweight” to China. But Sunak’s words were a slap across the face: the world has already moved to multipolarity, and India is not sitting at the top table among the 2 superpowers. Multipolar Reality Sunak’s statement confirms what many outside the Western bubble already know: the US-led order is finished. Trump is not the cause of this collapse—he’s the symptom. His rise reflects America’s contradictions: a superpower drowning in debt, polarized at home, overstretched abroad. Just like late Ottoman sultans who clung to populism while their empire crumbled, Trump embodies decline, not renewal. China, meanwhile, has emerged as a full-spectrum rival—economically, militarily, technologically. That’s the reality Sunak acknowledged. And he did it in India, where elites have been desperate to believe they are equal to China. The contrast could not be sharper. India as “Supply Chain Hub”? Sunak dangled a carrot: India could be a “trusted partner” and “potential supply chain hub” as the West diversifies away from China. But let’s be honest—this is the same “China + 1” narrative we heard back in 2020. Back then, Western firms said they’d move factories out of China. The winner wasn’t India. It was Vietnam. Why? Because Vietnam is next door to China, plugged directly into Chinese supply chains. Its ports, logistics, and industrial clusters are integrated with southern China’s manufacturing ecosystem. Multinationals could shift assembly lines to Vietnam without breaking their supply chain backbone. India, by contrast, was too far, too bureaucratic, too expensive in logistics, and too unpredictable in policy. India had a PR win over China – when it was crowned “most likely to succeed” in China + 1 as Modi was a good friend of Trump! See where Modi is now with Trump? India’s Missed Chances If India truly wants to be a manufacturing hub, it needs to face hard truths: 1.Foreign investment friendliness – Investors complain about red tape, sudden tax changes, and weak infrastructure. India must fix this. 2.Integration with Chinese supply chains – Pretending you can replace China is fantasy. The smart move is to plug into China’s ecosystem, not fight it. Vietnam understood this. India resisted, and lost. 3.Geopolitical realism – India wants to be a “swing state,” hedging between blocs. But hedging only works if you have leverage. Without manufacturing depth, India’s leverage is limited. OECD Debts near Breaking Points? Western debt markets are turning into a casino. Just look at US, Japan and France. Sunak warned tech firms may soon issue more debt than the US government, showing how private capital dominates—chasing quick profits and leaving economies unstable. In my opinion, China’s model is different. Debt is directed by the state, used to build railways, factories, and green tech, not gamble on short term returns. This approach is civilizational: China has always valued stability and long term planning. For developing countries, that predictability is far more sustainable than Western finance, which is predatory and short lived. In a multipolar world, China’s debt system looks built to last. The Bigger Picture Sunak’s speech in India was more than a policy talk. It was a reality check. •China is the new superpower and peer to the US. •India is still the aspirant. •Multipolarity is here. •OECD debts are worrisome For India, the choice is stark: keep chasing the fantasy of replacing China, or accept reality and integrate with the Chinese supply chain while reforming its own investment climate. Otherwise, India risks being left behind, watching Vietnam and ASEAN reap the benefits of diversification. Conclusion Sunak’s words in New Delhi cut through the illusions. The US-led order is gone. Trump is the symptom of America’s decline. China is the peer competitor. And India? Still waiting for its moment, but unless it changes course—making itself investment-friendly and integrating with China—it will remain on the sidelines of the multipolar world. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
233
466
94
1,605
404,625
Most in the West don't care a fcuk..... the country is led by a whimpering coward & every second person I know will give anything & everything to get out... travel with an Indian passport and you'll know where we stand globally!
A few things happened: 1. Narendra Damodardas Modi refused to compromise against anything that is remotely anti-India 2. PM Modi created a global aura for the country, which vanished under Manmohan Singh 3. FCRA BILL. Follow the money, honey. It’s loading bro 👊⏳ 4. How can a once colonised nation even dream of becoming a global superpower? 5. The Lutyens brigade was losing their sheen, shine and moon 6. The Bengal defeat was a crushing blow - PAKISTAN’s ISI and money from human trafficking and drugs are now going to waste. As well as a few terrorists 7. Some foreign investors are losing long term and short term hedges Now, if you can connect the dots… Some of you will…
1
6
881
Wait till he hits Singapore! And not even a domestic flight, but every flight is international….there is a different world out here…no passport needed, no immigration for residents..
There is no faster city for flying than San Francisco. 9:10pm: Leave house 9:32pm: Arrive at SFO 9:40pm: Get to gate 9:43pm: Boarding starts 9:48pm: At seat I’ve never done a 38min house-seat time before.
1
5
565
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
The smartest Indians continue to come to build in the US for the simple reason that the economic incentives are far far better. Perplexity ($20B), Skild ($14B+), Baseten ($13B), Together ($8B), Glean ($8B), Modal ($5B), Rubrik ($25B), Harness ($5B), Blacksmith, Parallel, Greptile, CodeRabbit, Composio, Distyl ($2B), Resolve, Luma, Cartesia, Wispr, dMatrix, Arize and many more - all started by at least one Indian-born founder. The US is a far easier to raise capital in with far less dilution. Most Indian companies are switching where they're domiciled to get access to the US capital markets. Every single Indian venture firm is trying very hard to invest in the US or risk not participating in the AI race (ironically, the management fees of venture firms are so high in India relatively that this is the one group that net of carry actually has incentive to be in India because they take home well north of a living wage whether or not funds perform do) While Zomato ($35B now, $8B at IPO) might be the biggest outcome in Indian venture, Cursor ($60B), Reflection (potentially $20B+), World Labs ($8B), OpenRouter ($8B), HuggingFace ($12B) and of course the $1T+ big labs quickly make those outcomes seem small and happen on a much smaller time scale, with much higher IRR. Engineers at these startups regularly get paid $1M/yr, and make $10M+ on exit. Even in BigTech, it is trivial to pull up levels fyi and see that if you're L6/L7+ with ~10 years of experience, you're making $1M/yr there too. And of course, we all know the slew of Indian CEOs of companies here, not to mention a huge bench of lesser known executives across the board in public and private companies. I say all this because every time there is a slight immigration hiccup in the US, I hear the online pleas to "build in India", I struggle to understand why most engineers, academics or founders would do that net of desire to be close to family, failure to obtain visa and devout patriotism. This is not a superiority thing or a US v India thing. The economic incentives at least for technologists to being in the US outweigh India by at least an order of magnitude.
236
338
118
4,282
506,432
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
Sunday Times UK/The Observer/NYT
3
134
7
251
13,885
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
Somewhere alone in an underground luxury bunker Modi is scrolling Neha Bora accounts and whimpering in fear
9
38
1
408
4,859
And you could only find an American-owned tech platform to write this?
It is very notable, how American techies want to help these scumbag “protesters”. Jack Dorsey is pushing BitChat, to enable these rabid mobs to organize even when mobile networks are jammed and disrupted by Indian police and security forces. Elon Musk wants to open the avenue of Starlink to give these toxic mobs internet access at his personal will, defying India’s government and security considerations. Meanwhile, Instagram and X are being flooded with propaganda to brainwash more of the youth. These are not accidents or coincidences, it is a deliberate design. It is a full-scale information war. I call upon my fellow Indian tech entrepreneurs, investors and executives - speak out against these god-complexed madmen, whom many regard as icons to emulate, because they are out to balkanize and destroy India by all means possible. These fanatic tech elites would be quite happy to reduce India into a Pakistan-type mistress to be used and abused at will - a market to be exploited and a human resource pool to be consumed. They have no humanitarian consideration or cultural regard whatsoever for your society, way of life and civilization. I also call upon @DelhiPolice to use the full force of law, and take on these street thugs portraying themselves as “youth”, who are trying to effectively capture and immobilize Delhi - rain blows on them, smash their bones if required. Cripple them permanently if they take to violence - no mercy. @HMOIndia
5
5
1,574
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
Remove 190 nuclear weapons from India, and it would look like an upgraded version of Somalia. From the moment we wake up to our alarms to the moment we fall asleep scrolling through social media, so much of our daily technology depends on the US. The Indian government is making excuses. We’re already deeply connected to global technology, and absolute security in today’s digital world is almost impossible. Going against Elon Musk, one of the most influential figures in the tech industry, could eventually cost India more than it gains. Not today, not tomorrow, but eventually, i believe the Modi government will allow Starlink to operate in India. India should focus on building a partnership with Starlink. Elon is a technological visionary, and allowing Starlink into the Indian market could create more opportunities for India and its people.
225
49
17
336
239,622
Joji Philip Thomas retweeted
💯I became a journalist because of watching this guy (and Appan Menon) and his world this week.
When he talks about his four decades of analyzing elections, he’s basically taking a generation of us back to a childhood where we learned, while watching the movies that played between election bulletins, that “swing” wasn’t just something that happened with a new cricket ball.
3
15
637
Elon was taking potshots at a coward…
Prime Minister Modi has remained silent till now. @elonmusk will soon realise why mixing business and politics is toxic.
1
341
Don’t insult the country! Why would it need a coward?
India needs Modi now, more than ever.
188