JS Denain (@js_denain) profile picture
Joined October 2024
Photo by JS Denain (@js_denain)
JS Denain retweeted
Frontier labs are investing massively in RL environments, yet most of what happens in this space stays behind closed doors. @chrisbarber and @js_denain interviewed 18 people from RL environment startups, neolabs, and frontier labs. Here's what they found:
9
41
8
368
114,313
I rarely use this account. If you want to read more of my thoughts you can follow me at @datagenproc!
1
242
Conventional wisdom says that the US can’t build power but China can, so China’s going to “win the AGI race by default”. We think this is wrong. The US likely can build enough power to support AI scaling through 2030 — as long as they’re willing to spend a lot. A thread:
2
40
13
180
55,888
Should AI regulations be based on training compute? As training pipelines become more complex, they could undermine compute-based AI policies. In a new piece with Google DeepMind’s AI Policy Perspectives team, we explain why. 🧵
8
11
2
62
8,474
Very excited about this analysis by @GregHBurnham!
xAI commissioned us to analyze Grok 4’s math capabilities. Our findings: + It’s good at involved computations, improving at proofs (from a low base), and useful for literature search. - It favors low-level grinds and leans on background knowledge. Read on for examples!
1
3
728
How fast has society been adopting AI? Back in 2022, ChatGPT arguably became the fastest-growing consumer app ever, hitting 100M users in just 2 months. But the field of AI has transformed since then, and it’s time to take a new look at the numbers. 🧵
2
48
5
250
27,852
We are still hiring for an Engineering Lead on our Benchmarking team! We need a software engineer with outstanding technical expertise (no AI experience necessary) who's excited about leading evaluations on frontier AI models.
1
1
1
13
3,216
Introducing FrontierMath Tier 4: a benchmark of extremely challenging research-level math problems, designed to test the limits of AI’s reasoning capabilities.
17
61
24
557
88,491
Running SWE-bench evals is very slow and difficult. To solve this, we created a registry of optimized Docker images that let us run SWE-bench Verified in just one hour on a single 32-core machine. Today, we are open-sourcing these images— anyone can `docker pull` them.
3
13
4
197
10,660
The GitHub API doesn't seem to support changing the visibility of an image on the Container Registry. This is a huge problem for me as I have 4,219 images I need to make public for an @EpochAIResearch project :( Anyone at GitHub who could help with this?
2
2
5
895
SWE-bench Verified is one of the main benchmarks to assess AI coding skills. But what does it actually measure? We found that it's one of the best tests of AI coding, but limited by its focus on simple bug fixes in familiar repositories. Here’s a summary of our article 🧵
6
29
12
395
418,924
Three years and 100+ projects in, our mission is the same: give everyone clear, trusted insight into where AI is headed. Our new post unpacks the principles behind every research choice—why we take some ideas on and pass on others. epoch.ai/blog/what-is-epoch
7
1
44
3,221
We’re hiring an Engineering Lead to help guide our Benchmarking team! Provide independent evaluations of today’s and tomorrow’s AI models, leading to better research, policy, and decision-making. The role is fully remote, and applications are rolling.
15
23
2
167
345,586
At @EpochAIResearch, we've been trying to benchmark the new Google models, but it's impractical due to super-low rate limits on all experimental models (5-10 RPM) We've been facing this since Gemini 2.0 Flash thinking: released 19 December of last year, and still 'experimental'!
11
7
1
193
20,949
Just did a preliminary evaluation of DeepSeek-R1 on FrontierMath-2024-12-04, a subset of 191 questions (the full set is still in construction).
1
1
2
41
5,120
It got 10 questions correct i.e. 5.2%, which is better than the results we found with o1-preview, claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, or gemini-1.5-pro-002, but worse than the 25% score OpenAI reported for o3.
4
4
2
32
4,400
With the same evaluation code, gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-01-21 got 5 questions correct (2.6%), gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05 got 3 questions correct (1.6%) and o3-mini got 17 questions correct (8.9%).
1
1
4,219
Note that for this evaluation we used a similar scaffold to the one described in the FrontierMath paper, whereas the o3 result was obtained by OpenAI with their own (presumably more advanced) scaffold.
1
14
783
We are building a much cleaner implementation of FrontierMath evaluations and will share more detailed results with it soon!
1
13
750