Pinned Tweet
🚨NEW VIDEO 🚨
President Biden’s judicial nominees are unfit and unqualified to serve.
Americans deserve the best legal minds upholding the rule of law and defending the Constitution on the federal bench – and they are not getting that with President Biden’s judicial nominees.
Packing the Supreme Court used to be a fringe, radical idea, but it is now a campaign promise in nearly every Democrat’s playbook.
We must restore respect for the independence of the judiciary.
thefederalist.com/2026/09/01…
Read the latest from JCN President @JCNSeverino: Religious Liberty Back at the Court Tomorrow
nationalreview.com/bench-mem…
Must Read from @BayerPicciotti: Colorado's universal preschool revives vile anti-Catholic laws
foxnews.com/opinion/andrea-p…
Justice Clarence Thomas has been baselessly ridiculed and attacked since his nomination to the Supreme Court. The truth is that the originalist justice has shown judicial wisdom throughout his career.
Senator @tedcruz sets the record straight. 👇
I argued nine cases before the Supreme Court. Clarence Thomas never asked me a single question.
The left claimed it was because he was too stupid to speak.
My theory was different. He wanted to listen to the arguments, rather than interrupt lawyers with questions.
When the Court changed its format to give each justice time to ask questions, Clarence Thomas started asking plenty of them.
I discuss this in the opening chapter of Going Further.
Order now at goingfurther.com.
“They don’t have a great First Amendment track record at the court, but they continue to think that they have the leeway under the Constitution to exclude religious folks.” - @becketfund’s Amanda Dixon
washingtonexaminer.com/news/…
Erika Nagle shares how Colorado's “universal” preschool program discriminates against her and her family because they wish to send their children to St. Mary’s catholic school.
The Supreme Court can end this religious discrimination in St. Mary’s Catholic Parish v. Roy.
ICYMI: JCN President @JCNSeverino reacts to Justice Kagan’s comments on originalism in her latest piece for @NRO. 👇
nationalreview.com/bench-mem…
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy and have the opportunity to end Colorado’s discrimination against Catholic families.
Read JCN President @JCNSeverino’s piece for @nypost to learn more. 👇
nypost.com/2026/05/04/opinio…
Must Listen: @ProsecutorsPod breaks down the Supreme Court's oral arguments in Suncor v. Boulder and what is at stake.
In case you missed it, probably our most nerdy legal briefs episode ever discusses the Supreme Court argument in the Suncor case:
236. Suncor and the Future of Energy
The Supreme Court started off with a bang this term, hearing perhaps the most important case of the year first. What is Suncor, and what does it mean for the future of energy litigation and, most importantly, your electric bill?
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…,,
ICYMI: @RepHageman shares how climate activists are attempting to circumvent the legislative process and use the courts to push their agenda.
The Supreme Court can end this power grab in Suncor v. Boulder.
.@RepHageman sounds the alarm on Suncor v. Boulder and the push to force Europe’s failed climate agenda on American consumers:
"This is a way to circumvent the legislative process and use the courts to impose basically a carbon tax... All you need to do is look at Europe to see where we're headed if we allow these things to go forward."
Her Stop Climate Shakedowns Act would shut down these lawsuits. Credit to her for standing up for consumers who would be stuck paying the price.
@RuthlessPodcast
Virginia's Amendment 1 would nullify modest protections for the unborn and undermine parental rights.
Read JCN President @JCNSeverino's piece for @NRO to learn more. 👇
nationalreview.com/bench-mem…
Read the latest from JCN President @JCNSeverino: If Only Justice Kagan Had Meant It When She Said We Are All Originalists
nationalreview.com/bench-mem…
ICYMI: Since the Supreme Court’s ruling in SFFA v. Harvard, the number of Asian-American students admitted has more than doubled.
ICYMI: Inside Democrats’ Secret Effort to Stack Alaska’s Ballot
nytimes.com/2026/10/28/us/po…
New reporting reveals that the American Medical Association has revived its racial preferences in scholarships for medical students.
The Supreme Court was crystal clear in SFFA v. Harvard: race-based preferences are unconstitutional.
dailysignal.com/2026/10/28/a…
ICYMI: Since the Supreme Court’s ruling in SFFA v. Harvard and the end of unconstitutional race-based admissions, Asian Americans' admission rates have soared.
freebeacon.com/campus/asian-…
ICYMI: Florida’s Democrat Senate Candidate ‘Absolutely’ Supports Packing SCOTUS
thefederalist.com/2026/10/27…
JCN retweeted
The number of Asian-American students entering the freshman class at Harvard has *more than doubled* since Students for Fair Admissions sued Harvard over race-based discrimination in its admissions practices.
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy and have the opportunity to put a stop to Colorado’s discrimination against religious families.
One week from today, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy.
If Colorado’s preschool program is truly universal, why are Catholic families excluded? Catholic families and preschools are asking the Court to ensure equal access to this public benefit.
Learn more at faithdeservesfairness.com.
Colorado’s “universal” preschool program is not actually universal when it discriminates against religious families based on their catholic faith.
For families making sacrifices to afford Catholic school, $6,000 in preschool funding can make all the difference. Yet Colorado denies that assistance to parents choosing Catholic preschool because of the schools' faith.
On November 3, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy. Becket’s Amanda Dixon explains what’s at stake in a new episode of Stream of Conscience.
Listen to the full episode here: youtu.be/jI87JO-7SvU









