Kostas M.

I’ve now gone through @bitcoinhodlco audited FY2026 accounts, and as a shareholder with over 10% of the company, I think it’s time for the board to confront some very uncomfortable numbers. At 30 June 2026, B HODL had £8.5m in assets, including £7.36m of Bitcoin. Its entire annual revenue was £34,781. Not profit. Revenue. Of that, £20,598 came from the CoinCorner Rewards Account. The supposedly value-adding Lightning business generated just £14,183. That equates to total revenue of approximately 0.47% of the year-end Bitcoin treasury, with Lightning contributing only 0.19%. For perspective, US 13-week Treasury bills currently yield 4.15%. That’s nearly nine times the total revenue ratio and over 21 times the Lightning component when measured against the full Bitcoin treasury. Not a like-for-like investment comparison, but an extraordinary illustration of how little income this business has generated. Meanwhile, B HODL’s own stated operating costs are approximately £46,000 per month, or £550,000 annually. Almost sixteen times its reported annual revenue. The accounts also disclose £93,000 in administrative support charges to CoinCorner, plus approximately £11,000 in financing and direct costs. CoinCorner is a significant shareholder with representatives on the board. The charges involving CoinCorner alone were nearly three times the company’s entire revenue. The company can point to more encouraging unaudited weekly Lightning yields since the year end, but a handful of weekly results on a small fraction of the treasury is not proof of sustainable economics. I recognise that Lightning launched in May. But shareholders are entitled to question whether this structure will ever produce sufficient returns to justify its costs. The underlying Bitcoin is liquid. The shares are not. In my opinion, this business model has not worked financially to date, and shareholders should not be expected to continue funding an expensive listed-company structure indefinitely. I believe the board should put an orderly winding-up and return-of-capital proposal to shareholders. Settle the liabilities, realise or distribute the residual Bitcoin value, and return it to shareholders. And remarkably, while we are challenging the conditions imposed on our request to inspect the company’s books, the board is now proposing to narrow shareholder inspection rights under Article 141. No amount of glossy investor presentations changes the arithmetic. This isn’t compounding Bitcoin for shareholders. It’s compounding overhead. It’s time to face reality. @freddienew

I woke up with an idea to reward one hard working community member who wants to stream content with $1 Million USDC. You’d have to be a legit MetaWin player to be accepted. And give it your all for 30 days. We’d provide the streaming capital. Anyone interested ?

I paid $5k deposit and within 10 days I’ll send my $245,000 wire. But - @elonmusk if you’re seeing this, I’m gonna need that Rocket version invite 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

Let’s make someone a USDT Millionaire this month at MetaWin… Who’s in ?

I’m gonna restart my basketball career this winter in Miami. Do I have any followers who a) play basketball - b) live close to south Beach ? And no I’m not flying to Nigeria… 😂

Ok folks - NEW format for today’s giveaway. Guess the Number! it’s a dollar amount of money and the closest guess wins the lot. Full cash out, no wagering Drop your guess and active MetaWin username to enter.

Got myself up to speed on the little drama tonight. Here's what happened. @wistin01 won a $250 giveaway from @SamuelXeus, paid straight into his @MetaWin account. Like the MetaWin giveaways it had a 5x wager, which is standard and very reasonable. Instead of playing it through himself, he was put in touch with @NoahTheDivine, who helps winners claim for 15%. That's about the same as the wager would cost on average anyway. The bonus was cancelled partway through, and now the win is gone and he's understandably upset. Honestly, I'm not sure why you'd pay someone 15% of your cash out when you can just play the games yourself. That's the fun part, and support is there if you ever get stuck. But that's casino play. You win some, you might win more and cash out, or you might lose it. That's the game, and it's no reason to set X on fire or drag my in personally. For transparency: I don't follow the day-to-day of every promotion. My marketing team runs them, and I hadn't heard of Xeus until tonight. Giveaways are meant to be a fun thank-you to the community. If they're causing more drama than joy, we'll move to wager rewards instead, where you earn back for playing. Same spirit, no fuss. On this occasion it seems the player did receive his win, he simply didn’t follow the rules of the promo and ended up paying someone else to help, who then lost it. Love to everyone who plays and enjoys it the way it's meant. Let's move on. ❤️