Lenikuni (@lenikuni67) header
Lenikuni (@lenikuni67) profile picture

In search of truth and liberty.

Monterrey, México
Joined April 2026
An excellent advice, girls! I'll add my own grain of knowledge : do not start screaming like monkeys on a branch. Women's cries arouses the mood of the fighters and something that could end up fast will keep on happening. Stay apart, and stay composed and quiet.
This is a public service announcement for all women everywhere ever. A fight does not happen by mutual consent. A fight happens because one person decides to start it. That's ONE. Uno. Un. Eins. Ichi. Yī. Unus. Ett. Hana. Wāḥid. One is not two. Your man is not in a fight because he looked at the other guy, and they both said, hey, let's totally throw down, bro, as if fighting were a pickup game of basketball. Your man is in a fight because one person decided to attack. That person is not necessarily your man even if, and I cannot stress this enough, even if your man is the one who throws hands first. Yes, you read that right. If you don't understand, if it makes no sense to you, that's because you know nothing about fighting. If you grab your man and try to restrain him, you are not preventing the fight. You are restraining him while the fight occurs. Just because you would like your man to exit the situation does not necessarily mean he can. Even if he can, that does not necessarily mean he should. He knows about fighting. Some men know less about it, and some men know more, but unless you are Ronda Rousey or Lena Miculek, your man always knows more about fighting than you. If you have something you want him to do, like exit the situation if he can, use your words like a big girl. Do not touch him. He will ignore you, of course, because you have no idea what you are talking about, but you can talk if it makes you happy. Do not touch him. Step back from the area of conflict and get out of the way. Keep him between you and the threat if possible. Do not get between him and the threat. That is retarded. Also do not touch him. If you do touch him, do not be surprised if you shoves you hard enough to land you on your butt ten feet away. This is the appropriate response. He is trying to protect himself and you from your willful ignorance. Do not touch him. If you do touch him, and he survives, do not be surprised if he ends the relationship afterwards. You grossly disrespected his judgement, and put him in serious danger with your selfish desire to be right all the time. Do not touch him. The time to have a conversation about whether the fight should have happened is after the fight, not while people are in danger. Do not touch him. Okay, quick reading comprehension test. What should you not do?
6
236
Suscribo
Los musulmanes son musulmanes por su religión que es el Islam, no por su raza. Así que de racismo nada. Partiendo de ahí, en México cualquier religión puede ser criticada, satirizada o incluso rechazada con el derecho de una plena libertad de expresión. Aunque les duela. Y etiquetar la crítica al islam como "islamofobia" es una estrategia para infundir temor al debate y restablecer de hecho el delito de blasfemia en sociedades libres. Y criticar con dureza los textos, preceptos y acciones islámicos anti derechos humanos, violentos y criminales, es un acto de honestidad intelectual, NO de intolerancia. Apréndanselo bien.
8
They were told. They wouldn't listen.
Replying to @countryregio
Veritas Temporis Filia
87
Oh dear neighbors, vote wisely 🙁🙏
I VOTED TODAY, and let me tell you, that polling place was PACKED! Couldn’t tell you whether they were Democrats, Republicans, Independents, or what. I had on a dark blue shirt under my sweater, so I probably threw everybody off right there. 😂 But the real stars of the show were my fabulous nails and my eye patches! My friend from the show Lioness told me about those patches, and the ladies at the polling place absolutely loved them. They wanted to know if they worked. I said, “Well, look at my eyes! Don’t they look fabulous?” Not a stitch of makeup on, hair looking like I’d been dragged through a hedge backward, but apparently my nails and eye patches were a hit! And between the blue shirt and my unkempt appearance, they probably figured I was voting Democrat. Little did they know! Blue hair instead of a blue shirt would have been a nice touch. 😂 I voted straight RED, all the way down the ballot! ❤️ Now, people, GET OUT AND VOTE! We have to show up. We can’t complain about election results if we can’t be bothered to get off the couch and cast a ballot. I’ll give the Democrats one thing: They know how to get out and vote! They may not mow their grass, they may not have a job, and they might punch you in the face and burn down your house, but by golly, they know where their polling place is! So get out there and VOTE! Your vote doesn’t count if it never leaves your living room! 🇺🇸
33
“Women talk a lot about how scared of male violence they are, but from their behavior it's clear they never actually consider it a possibility” When I was eighteen I was out for the night with my bf and some friends, we were barhopping in Kings Cross. I was tipsy & occasionally lippy & obnoxious towards strangers (who were asking for it!). My bf quietly & discreetly at one point during the night said “babe, I love you, but fuck sometimes I worry that you’re writing cheques I won’t be able to cash, if it comes to and I’m on my own”. I was like “wtf are you talking about?” He literally had to explain to me that if I was being a fuckwit starting trouble, he’d obviously have to defend me if anything went down, and if I’m being a massive smart ass and it’s just like him & me & my best girlfriend, then he’s going to be in a fight on his own. All because I was being an antagonistic smart ass to some strangers who couldn’t take a joke. The idea that I needed to be able to back up my words with violence if it came to it, was something that had literally never occurred to me. Ever. It was a total revelation. Suddenly i realised talk wasn’t “cheap” in this context, it was expensive. The idea that I could effectively get him beaten up, or put him in real danger, by being a precocious little shit arguing with idiots because I could, was horrifying. From then on I was extremely reluctant to ever argue with strangers or act like a smart ass unnecessarily, because I was suddenly keenly aware that the guys we were with could potentially be expected to pay with their lives for any poorly received flippant comments we made. It really was totally novel to me. This isn’t how women see the world, at all.
Ideally, he wouldn't have reacted like this But any guy is aware that when you shove another man, getting lightly swatted (or more) is 100% on the table, so they won't do it unless they're being intentionally aggressive Women talk a lot about how scared of male violence they are, but from their behavior it's clear they never actually consider it a possibility We don't live in the 60s. You're shoving a steroid user on an athletic scholarship in the middle of a football game. You have to understand that this inherently comes with a degree of danger
402
1,223
141
18,456
669,579
In 1957, a Russian immigrant published a novel of more than a thousand pages built around one question: what happens if the people who make the world run simply stop? Its title is Atlas Shrugged. In France it's called La Grève, The Strike. It wasn't even translated into French until 2011. That tells you something. This morning, I think Elon Musk wrote the sequel. A. Where the book comes from. Ayn Rand was born Alisa Rosenbaum in Saint Petersburg in 1905. As a teenager, she watched Bolshevik soldiers walk into her father's pharmacy and seize it in the name of the people. Her family lost everything. Not to a competitor. To a committee. She fled to America in 1926 and spent the rest of her life writing about one distinction: those who create, and those who seize. B. The story. In Atlas Shrugged, America is sliding into decline. Not because of war. Because of rules. Year after year, a growing class of bureaucrats, regulators and planners decides that production must be controlled, shared "fairly," frozen. They never build anything. They issue directives. The worst one freezes every worker in his job and forces every inventor to hand over his patents for the public good. And one by one, the people who make the country run start disappearing. The best engineers. The industrialists. The inventors. An oil man sets his own wells on fire before vanishing. The whole country keeps repeating a question it doesn't understand: "Who is John Galt?" John Galt is the man behind the disappearances. He has convinced the creators to go on strike. They withdraw to a hidden valley in the Colorado mountains, where everyone keeps what they make and trades freely. And they let the world find out what it looks like without them. The lights go out in New York. The grey men are left alone with their directives, and discover that a directive has never produced a single kilowatt. C. The core idea. The strike isn't about money. It's about consent. Rand's insight is that the system that captures the creators runs on their cooperation. It needs them to keep producing so it has something to redistribute. The bureaucrat is a parasite who needs a host. Remove the host, and he's exposed as what he always was: useless. D. What Musk just did. This morning, Musk announced that next year he will give one of his own SpaceX shares to every kid in America. "The first of many." Here's what's fascinating. It's the strike, run in reverse. Rand's creators withdrew. Musk stays. He keeps building rockets, satellites, AI. But instead of walking away from the system, he walks around it. The value goes straight from the builder to the citizen. No ministry, no agency, no committee in the middle. Rand had to make the creators disappear to prove the bureaucrats were useless. Musk doesn't need to disappear. He just needs to stop routing value through them. Same result. The grey men are left standing in the middle of a pipe nobody uses anymore. E. The difference that changes everything. Rand's strike has a flaw her critics never stopped pointing out: ordinary people are left behind. The creators retreat to their valley. The rest of the country sits in the dark. Musk's version fixes that. He isn't taking the creators out of the world. He's bringing the world into the valley. Every kid in America becomes a shareholder in the machine. Not a spectator of the strike. A participant. That's the alliance being formed right now: builders and citizens, directly, with nothing in between. And the only people who lose that deal are the ones who never built anything. F. Why now, and not in 1957. In Rand's time, the strike was a fantasy. You couldn't produce at scale without the state's permission, and you couldn't reach every citizen without its pipes. In 2026, one founder can build rockets, run a global network from orbit, and pledge equity to 73 million children in a single post. AI will soon do in seconds what a ministry does in years. The tools of the strike finally exist. And they don't require anyone to leave. G. The ending. For seventy years, "Who is John Galt?" was a shrug. A way of saying nothing can be done. In the book, the strike ends when the creators decide the road is clear and walk back into the world to rebuild it. That's the scene we're watching. Not a man leaving. A man coming back, with a gift for every child. The grey men are about to discover what Rand promised them seventy years ago: a world that no longer needs them.
I don't know if you realize what just happened. Elon Musk is completely bypassing the State. For 100 years, we've been told the problem is capital. That it must be captured, taxed, redistributed. With an army of intermediaries standing between those who create wealth and the people: ministries, agencies, commissions, bureaucrats. Musk is doing the opposite. He's taking his capital and giving it directly to the people. One SpaceX share to every kid in America. Not a handout. Not a subsidy. A piece of the machine that's taking humanity to Mars. And he says it himself: this is the first of many. Mises understood this back in 1944: the bureaucrat creates nothing. He administers what others created, following rules that have no connection to the value produced. The day value flows directly from the one who creates it to the one who receives it, the bureaucrat has no function left. That's what's being born right now. A new liberal world order, where the very concept of the State will make less and less sense. The world we're entering is a world of abundance. AI, robots, energy, space. And that abundance won't come through the State, for one simple reason: we have a century of proof that it doesn't work. Redistribution was version 1.0. Direct distribution of capital is 2.0. While France is still debating how to tax builders even more, America is handing stock to its kids. Pick your side.
298
2,121
196
8,888
302,558
Replying to @danielcberk
Elon represents something of a paradox, paradoxes are dissonance inducing. Elon is not perfect & has certainly done as least indirectly harmful things as he has created things. Here's the thing though, he is a net good operator for humanity regardless. The same cannot be said for huge swaths of human beings throughout various areas of society, all they do is take & regulate to stabilize & expand their ability to take. Elon creates, he builds, & humans of this type are exactly what humanity needs right now, we need those who want to exercise their ability to create things. It is in creation that you get progression, with progression comes improvement & with improvement comes new systems. Say what you wish about Elon, he is singlehandedly steering the future of humanity in ways, no other person on earth is. He's one of a handful of billionaires who among them has a real vision of taking what humanity is & expanding it.
1
2
270
Lenikuni retweeted
A los que piden que ardan las calles me gustaría preguntarles de qué calles estamos hablando, exactamente. Mas que nada por ir concretando, que lo mismo estamos todos de acuerdo hasta que ponemos una dirección. Porque uno dice "que arda todo" y queda super rebelde. Luego resulta que ese "todo" incluye el coche de una enfermera, la tienda de un señor que todavía está pagando el préstamo o un restaurante de una familia china que invirtio todos sus ahorros. La revolución tiene estos detallitos tontos cuando se acerca uno a mirar, porque te empiezan a salir personas por todas partes y te joden la panorámica. El señor de la tienda, por ejemplo, qué hace ahí? Por qué no comprende que le están construyendo un mundo mejor? Lleva veinte años trabajando como un mulo, paga impuestos, tiene dos empleados y una úlcera, pero se ve que le falta conciencia social. Ahí hay algo que a mí se me escapa. Todo esto se hace por el pueblo, pero para ser pueblo te piden más pedigrí que a un caniche de exposición. Porque al que pide que no le quemen el negocio le retiran el carnet en el acto. Alguien le ha preguntado qué quiere o sólo cuenta como pueblo mientras acepta sin rechistar que le jodan la vida? Todo para el pueblo, pero sin el pueblo. Espera, esto me suena. Entonces, quién es el pueblo? El que revienta el escaparate, sí. El que huye con los perfumes robados, también. El dueño, viendo cómo se llevan entre risas su trabajo, no, ese es un capitalista, que se joda. Yo le aconsejaría entrar y robarse algo, igual si es un poco ladrón lo reconocen como pueblo. Qué estamos justificando exactamente? A veces hay que utilizar la violencia para defenderse. Pero a quién estás defendiendo cuando le quemas el coche a un desconocido. Qué peligro has evitado reventando un local? Hasta dónde puedes llegar y quién te ha dado permiso? Porque como valga con estar convencido de que eres de los buenos, estamos jodidos. Pocos cabrones he conocido que no tuvieran una explicación preciosa para lo suyo. Imagina que la tienda es de tu hija y que, al intentar defenderla, le dan con una barra de hierro en la cabeza. Le explicas que hay que comprender esa rabia, que no se lo tome como algo personal y que están haciendo la revolución por su bien. Es solo por saber si el contexto te sigue pareciendo tan convincente cuando la que recibe es tu hija. O tu madre. Y me interesa también el tío que reparte el entusiasmo, ese que lleva días calentando el ambiente y después aparece muy preocupado porque alguien se ha calentado. No se lo explica. Dijo que había que hacer arder las calles, pero como florecen los almendros, una cosa poética. Cómo iba a saber que entre tanto cenutrio habría algunos poco familiarizados con la metáfora. Si a un idiota con la testosterona disparada le cuentas que su violencia es noble y le señalas a un enemigo, qué le estás dando? Una opinión o permiso? El que rompe paga, pero tú no eres, quizás, el responsable de todo? Qué barata sale la revolución cuando la casa y el cuerpo los ponen otros, amigo. Antes de pedir que arda todo, dime qué vas a poner tú, revolucionario de medio pelo, qué parte de tu vida estás dispuesto a ver hecha trizas. Y después quédate a explicarle al de la tienda para qué ha servido arruinarle la vida, igual tiene ganas de partirte la cara. Será un buen momento para explicarle que la violencia no lleva a ninguna parte. A ver si tienes cojones de darle esa lección delante de su negocio quemado.
372
5,079
364
12,443
377,472
I’m Iranian. Islam has destroyed my country.
I'm Canadian. I believe Islam will destroy my country.
1,145
19,683
1,043
145,968
3,220,126
"Das Pferd wird es immer geben, aber das Automobil ist nur eine Modeerscheinung – ein Spielzeug für Reiche." Michigan Savings Bank, 1903 "Ich denke, es gibt weltweit einen Markt für vielleicht fünf Computer." Thomas Watson, 1943 "No chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share." Steve Ballmer, 2007 "Das Internet hat für die Wirtschaft kaum wichtigere Auswirkungen als das Faxgerät." Paul Krugman, 1998 "Flugmaschinen, die schwerer sind als Luft, sind physikalisch unmöglich." Lord Kelvin, 1895 "Das Spam-Problem bei E-Mails wird in spätestens zwei Jahren gelöst sein" Bill Gates, 2004 "Der Fernseher wird sich auf dem Markt nicht halten. Die Menschen werden es bald leid sein, jeden Abend auf eine Sperrholzkiste zu starren." Darryl F. Zanuck, 1946 "Es gibt keinen Grund, warum jemand einen Computer in seinem Haus haben wollte." Ken Olson, 1977 "Wenn die Pariser Weltausstellung schließt, wird das elektrische Licht ausgehen und man wird nie wieder davon hören." Erasmus Wilson, 1878 "Die Amerikaner brauchen das Telefon vielleicht, wir aber nicht. Wir haben genug Laufburschen." William Preece, 1876 "Egal wie die Wissenschaft in Zukunft fortschreitet, der Mensch wird den Mond niemals erreichen." Lee De Forest, 1957 "Reisen mit hoher Geschwindigkeit ist nicht möglich, weil die Passagiere keine Luft mehr bekommen und an Erstickung sterben würden." Dionysius Lardner, 1830 "Mit Wechselstrom herumzuspielen ist reine Zeitverschwendung. Niemand wird ihn jemals nutzen." Thomas Edison, 1889 "Mobiltelefone werden die Drahttelefone absolut nicht ersetzen." Marty Cooper, 1981 #TeslaRoadster #Tesla
Der Tesla Roadster ist das beste Beispiel dafür, dass der Kapitalismus Dinge um ihrer selbst willen produziert, die niemand braucht.
499
8,743
498
43,915
1,342,181
Hoy los mexicanos están peleados con los mexicanos. Familias divididas, grupos de WhatsApp rotos, amigos que ya no se hablan por política. Eso no lo logró el PRIAN en décadas. La 4T lo consiguió en pocos años. Gobernar también es cuidar lo que nos une. Y eso se está perdiendo.
212
132
10
592
12,292
Lenikuni retweeted
Los mismos imbeciles que hoy esta chillando por el "carro volador " de Elon estarían llorando hace un par de siglos por la invencion de la locomotora, del telégrafo, del teléfono , del automóvil, la penicilina y de cualquier innovación que haya aumentado la expectativa de vida de los seres humanos y les ha ofrecido una vida mejor. IMBÉCILES.
74
129
3
621
6,430
Lenikuni retweeted
The Tesla Roadster event was so epic that it needed it's own music video Introducing "FLYING CARS" featuring Optimus 🔥
🤖 Made with AI
715
5,672
582
26,524
713,670
imagine if our own post got the world record for most replies on an X post
7,291
2,633
898
52,866
2,400,838
Applies anywhere 🙁
I’m French. I want to talk to Americans who are about to vote Democrat. Not to insult you. To warn you. I come from your future. In France we did everything your progressive politicians promise. Free healthcare, free college, generous welfare, strong unions, heavy regulation, high taxes on the rich, a state that takes care of everything. Public spending close to 57% of GDP, one of the highest on the planet. On paper, it’s the dream. Here’s what it looks like from the inside. France hasn’t passed a balanced budget since 1974. Our debt is above 3,300 billion euros. Interest on that debt is becoming one of the biggest items in the national budget. Our hospitals are collapsing despite record funding. Our schools rank lower every year. Young people with degrees can’t afford an apartment in the city they were born in. Our best engineers leave for London, Zurich and San Francisco. And the rich you wanted to tax? They left too, and took the jobs with them. The promise was protection. The result is stagnation. The worst part is that nobody in France voted for decline. Every single step sounded generous, compassionate, reasonable. One more program. One more regulation. One more tax to fund it. Each step alone makes sense. Fifty years of them, and you wake up in a country that can no longer build a nuclear plant on time or keep its streets safe. I love America because it’s the one place on earth where people still believe they can build something from nothing. I came to Silicon Valley as a self-taught kid and it changed my life. That spirit is the most precious thing your country has. Before you vote, ask yourself one question: is the program you’re voting for making America more like America, or more like France? Trust me. You don’t want to be France.
1
33
No sé si estarás de acuerdo, pero esta es la mujer con el mejor físico del mundo.
71
48
10
434
28,420
Lenikuni retweeted
Trump has two years left in office. An opposing Congress will waste them. Vote red and give him the majority required to complete the job.
942
449
17
4,086
44,263
Lenikuni retweeted
NO EXISTE PALESTINA 1. Antes de Israel, había un mandato británico, no un Estado palestino. 2. Antes del Mandato Británico, existía el Imperio Otomano, no un Estado palestino. 3. Antes del Imperio Otomano, existía el Estado islámico de los mamelucos de Egipto, no un Estado palestino. 4. Antes del Estado islámico de los mamelucos de Egipto, existía el Imperio ayubí-kurdo, no un Estado palestino. 5. Antes del Imperio ayubí, existía el reino franco cruzado y el reino cristiano de Jerusalén, no un estado palestino. 6. Antes del Reino de Jerusalén, existían los imperios Omeya y Fatimí, no un Estado palestino. 7. Antes de los imperios omeya y fatimí, existía el imperio bizantino, no un estado palestino. 8. Antes del Imperio bizantino existía el Imperio sasánida-persa, no un Estado palestino. 9. Antes del Imperio Sasánida-Persa, existía nuevamente el Imperio Bizantino, no un Estado palestino. 10. Antes del Imperio Bizantino existía el Imperio Romano, no un Estado palestino. 11. Antes del Imperio Romano, existía el Estado judío asmoneo, no un Estado palestino. 12. Antes del Estado judío asmoneo estaba el Imperio seléucida helenístico, no un Estado palestino. 13. Antes del imperio seléucida helenístico, existía el imperio de Alejandro Magno, no un estado palestino. 14. Antes de Alejandro Magno, existía el Imperio Persa, no un Estado palestino. 15. Antes del Imperio Persa, existía el Imperio Babilónico, no un estado palestino. 16. Antes del Imperio Babilónico, los reinos de Israel y Judá no eran estados palestinos. 17. Antes de los reinos de Israel y Judá, existía el Reino de Israel, no un Estado palestino. 18. Antes del Reino de Israel, existía la teocracia de las doce tribus de Israel, no un Estado palestino. 19. Antes de la teocracia de las doce tribus de Israel, había una aglomeración de ciudades-reino cananeas independientes, no un Estado palestino. Ha habido muchos gobiernos allí, pero nunca un Estado Palestino.
597
4,686
155
13,017
255,731
I feel it It's coming...
⚠️VIGILANCIA: posible #FrenteFrío2 y Aire Polar-Ártico -Periodo: 14-19/octubre -Zonas: norte, noreste, centro, oriente y sureste ✅Probabilidad actual del 50-70% con efectos de lluvias dispersas, viento y marcado descenso térmico 🌧️Lluvias muy fuertes en Chih, Dgo, Ver, Tab, Chis, Huasteca 🥶Ambiente fresco a frío especialmente el fin de semana 💨Posible PRIMER EVENTO “NORTE” >80 km/h el fin de semana; estados del norte también fuerte viento al finalizar miércoles PENDIENTES DE ACTUALIZACIONES‼️
35