@lib_calci
iAccount based inKorea
About this account
- Account based in
- Korea
- Connected via
- Web
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Samsung spent years turning an awkward engineering experiment into something you can actually live with. Apple looked at that finished shape, copied the passport form factor almost exactly, then poured their usual software sauce on top. The transitions look prettier. That’s real.
But calling the Fold 8 an idiot because Apple finally showed up with better animations feels backwards. Samsung had to invent the category, absorb all the early creases, battery compromises, and software gaps, and keep shipping until the hardware itself felt normal. Apple got to skip that part and start at “make it feel expensive.” That’s not the same as redefining the product.
I use iPhone every day so I get why the Duo’s polish hits different. Still doesn’t mean Samsung was just muddling through. They were the ones doing the unglamorous iteration so Apple could arrive later and make it look effortless.
The more iPhone Duo hands-on videos I watch, the more I feel that Samsung was just muddling through before Apple arrived.
Samsung has been making foldables for years, yet it never seems to have figured out what the experience should actually be like. Everything follows an engineering mindset: the screen folds, the features work, job done. But how much thought has gone into the transition between folded and unfolded, the little details of every interaction, and how it all actually feels to use?
Then Apple comes along, and suddenly you realize: a foldable can do this? It can feel like this? Things we had grown used to, and even accepted as inevitable, suddenly turn out to have so much room for improvement.
To me, Apple has both redefined the foldable and expanded our understanding of what one can be. That’s the difference between a great product and a mediocre one.
Now I look at the Galaxy Z Fold 8 in my hand, and it honestly looks like an idiot.
Samsung, please just stick to supplying hardware components. You really aren’t cut out to make software or finished consumer products.
계산기 retweeted
중국도 운전면허교습에서 강사의 홍길동 서포트(형을 형이라 하지 못하고) 많이 하는구나 ㅋㅋㅋ 여자가 좀 눈치가 느린거같음.
(처음에 안전띠 못메게 한 이유는 타래로)
今天去考试,教官针对我,不给我系安全带?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
中国驾考科目二/三标准要求考生先逆时针绕车一周检查、调整座椅后视镜,再系安全带;不按顺序操作扣分或不合格,考官不得口头提示。
zh.wikisource.org/wiki/GA_1026-2…
auto.china.com/mip/764952.html
회사가 그간 가라로 원룸비 받는 걸 몰랐겠냐? 다 써먹을 데가 있는 것이다
많은 사장님들이 "노조가 활개치는데 회사는 무슨 대응을 할 수 있는가?"를 묻는다
사측 전문 노무사들은 한결같이 얘기함 : "근태를 감독해라"
이 말이 무서운 것임
계산기 retweeted
삼성이 여러해동안 실 제품을 투입하며 엔지니어링을 깎아대는 동안
애플은 기술이 성숙될때까지 기다리다가 잘 익은 과실을 낼롬 가져가는 뱀 같은 짓을 저지르고서 혁신이라고 한다.
세상에 없던 것을 내놓는 혁신은 나가뒤진지 오래.
Apple이 폴더블을 내놓으면서 무대에서 제일 먼저 한 일은 남의 제품을 정면으로 깎는 것이었음.
폰 두 개를 어색하게 붙여놓은 느낌이라고 했다. 화면이 정사각형에 가까워서 세로 콘텐츠는 스크롤이 답답하고 영화는 커다란 검은 띠에 갇힌다고도 했다. 화면을 키웠는데 오히려 더 작게 느껴진다는 말까지 하고 나서 iPhone Duo를 꺼냈다.
7년 늦게 들어오는 쪽이 쓸 수 있는 카드는 사실 이것 하나다. 먼저 간 사람들이 못 푼 지점을 콕 집고, 그걸 우리가 풀었다고 말하는 것.
늦게 들어와서 기준을 다시 쓰는 건 이 회사가 스무 해 동안 반복해온 방식이다.