I'm into new tech, photography, drones, anything to do with the sea and weather. Also on MeWe, Getter, Gab, to counter the eco-terrorism.
Northern Ireland, United Kingd
Joined June 2009
- Tweets84.8K
- Following1.3K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes95.3K
Mark Stronge retweeted
NEW ARTICLE: Our results show that exceptional and brave attending physicians reported COVID-19 vaccine-caused deaths on the death certificates that they were legally mandated to complete, despite the large professional, institutional and political bias against doing so, and that these death-certificate results constitute a significant safety signal unprecedented since at least 1968. There is no justification for a claim that the COVID-19 vaccines are "safe", since they caused certified deaths, beyond any previous levels for any vaccine type. The side effect of death must be mentioned in informing patients. There is a definite lower-bound risk of death that cannot be argued away by health agencies.
Mark Stronge retweeted
Why does the CDC's cancer data stop at 2022?
How is it we can track measles cases by the day but have a 4 year lag in cancer data?
@CDCgov @CDCDirector @SecKennedy
Mark Stronge retweeted
More blatant anti Russian propaganda from BBC
BBC writes: "Up to 6,000 people, including 200 children, were believed to still be living in Oleshky"
Then we are told there were only "750 evacuees". BBC also fails to mention that a large potion of these 750 evacuees chose to be taken to Russia and not Ukraine or that some people willingly chose to remain in Russian held Oleshky.
BBC: "Residents had a four-hour window on Friday to leave, with a convoy of 25 buses brought in for up to 750 evacuees, along with ambulances for people with limited mobility."
And
"But those who managed to escape also worry about those left behind. "There are still a lot of people left there, living under those conditions," said Olha."
bbc.com/news/articles/cqglw3…
nitter.cf/theLemniscat/status/21…
"BBC reaches a new low in Western cynicism. The British news report shows people eating weeds from gardens, while drones are attacking those delivering food. The report doesn't mention whose drones they are."
Alexandr Kots: "Why is Ukraine trying to create a new Bucha out of Oleshky?
Sibiga, the Foreign Minister, stood before the UN Security Council and invoked the memory of the siege of Leningrad. He stated that Oleshky is under siege, and "Moscow is the only reason for this catastrophe."
The comparison to Leningrad is striking. However, the independent nation's top diplomat has assigned the roles incorrectly. Oleshky is a city under Russian control on our side of the Dnipro River. On the right bank are the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Ukrainian drones are encircling the city, hovering over every path. In 1942, German aircraft attacked along the "Road of Life" on Lake Ladoga. Today, Ukrainian FPV drones are targeting cars carrying food to Oleshky. The question of who is the "Northern Army Group" in this scenario is rhetorical.
At the beginning of September, a humanitarian convoy was met at the entrance to the city. It contained 10 tons of food and essential supplies. The cars were marked. The drivers got out, raised their hands, and showed that they were civilians. The operators struck the first and last vehicles. The entrance was blocked. The supplies did not reach the people.
In one week at the end of August, the head of the aOleshky district, Ruslan Khomenko, counted 1322 drone strikes and 1272 artillery strikes. They are targeting cars, ambulances, and municipal vehicles. Roads are being remotely mined.
And then the BBC reaches a new low in Western cynicism. The British news report shows people eating weeds from gardens, while drones are attacking those delivering food. The report doesn't mention whose drones they are. Instead, it makes the absurd claim that "Ukraine has been trying to deliver essential supplies to the area, but without success in recent months." How were they trying? By dropping them from the same "bird"?
German "colleagues" have gone even deeper. Bild reports that the city has been "surrounded by Russians for several months," and that traveling the four kilometers to Kherson is "impossible." The Russians have surrounded a city that they themselves control.
The main voice of this current campaign is the head of the Ukrainian "military administration" of Oleshky, Tatyana Gasanenko. Appointed by a decree of Zelensky in January 2023, she is in charge of a city that Kyiv had long since lost. She is registered in Oleshky, but according to an analysis of her declaration, she lives in Mykolaiv. From there, she tells "Ukrayinska Pravda" that people in the city are eating dogs. And then she reveals: the roads are mined, cars carrying food are being fired upon, on June 2, four cars were blown up on mines, and two people died. Tatyana Gasanenko forgot to specify who is mining the roads and who is firing.
Why does Kyiv need a second Bucha? The recipe is the same: first, the image, then the verdict. No investigation will be needed. A "ready-made Russian crime" is a trump card in any negotiations and an additional reason for another tranche of aid. There is certainly a practical goal as well. Oleshky is located directly opposite Kherson, a thorn in Kyiv's side. Driving out the last residents would turn the left bank into a dead zone, where any movement is a legitimate target. And the demand to "open humanitarian corridors" under international supervision is an attempt to bring foreign observers to our side and to negotiate a pause where the Ukrainian Armed Forces cannot break through on their own.
The Kremlin is not hiding the situation. Dmitry Peskov admitted: "Drones are constantly in the air, killing people. The situation is really critical." So, let's open a humanitarian corridor towards Melitopol, if Sibiga and the "journalists" of the BBC are so concerned about the fate of the residents of Oleshky. We are all for it. However, Ukraine recently burned a humanitarian convoy near Melitopol and killed three volunteers from the Siberian town of Tara. Will British propagandists show that?"
Translated from Russian
t.me/sashakots/64678
Mark Stronge retweeted
"You can cancel an election and ban the winner from running (Romania), you can ban your opponents from ever running again (Hungary), you can threaten to ban the main opposition party and subject it to relentless investigations by the secret police (Germany), you can threaten a ban on the leading presidential candidate and make them wear an ankle monitor (France), every member of your circle can be investigated for corruption (Spain), you can try and cancel local elections because you will lose them (Britain), and you can storm the constitutional court with riot police because you want to control it (Poland).
You can just do all these things. The secret is you just have to be on the right side of the European Commission."
Writer: Jacob Reynolds
Mark Stronge retweeted
Joe Rogan was asked a simple question: if you survive a heart attack and take a statin for 5 years, how much longer will you live?
He guessed a few years.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra gave him the number that comes straight from the statin trials themselves. On average, the answer is just over four days.
Four days is just the start. Here's what they never tell you about statins: 🧵
Mark Stronge retweeted
"The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) is a collaborative project that monitors the safety of vaccines and conducts studies on adverse events (side effects or health problems that occur after vaccination)."
Sounds great! Let's have a look!
No you may not!
You must first fill out a long application, explain precisely what you want to know, reveal what your hypothesis is, explain your methods, and your research can only take place on site, at a single workstation with no more than 3 people, and you must pay per day for access.
Interesting, too, the pitch is that this system allows researchers to "find rare problems." In other words, the CDC already bakes in the conclusion of any conceivable study: all safety issues are rare.
cdc.gov/vaccine-safety-syste…
Mark Stronge retweeted
A confused college student tells Joshua Haymes she’s a man, and she doesn’t care if he wants to identify as a cat.
Then Haymes asks if he can identify as black, and her reasoning hits a brick wall fast.
HAYMES: “Why can you change your gender but I can’t change my race?”
[long awkward silence]
STUDENT: “Um, because race is a like, is a thing that is like, a physical characteristic, right?”
“That is something that like, you’re born into. And you could say, yeah, you’re born into sex. You’re born into gender ... But at some point when I was growing up, I started to get uncomfortable being a woman, and being a man was more comfortable for me.”
HAYMES: “Jay, I appreciate you giving me your experience. And what I would say is that, why can’t I have that same experience with race?”
“So, like if I said, ‘I have never really identified with white culture. I always listen to 50 Cent and Jay-Z and I really don’t feel like I’m a white person.’
“Um, why can’t I be black?”
Her silence lasted longer than her argument.
Mark Stronge retweeted
More footage has emerged that Nigel Farage didn't even touch Lib Dem MP Caroline Voaden let alone "sent her flying"
@CommonsSpeaker please investigate this behaviour.
Mark Stronge retweeted
The end of #CelebrityTraitors was the most BBC thing EVER.
Because of COURSE the two winners are donating their winnings - our licence fee money - to a charity for refugees and a charity for "queer" refugees.
Mark Stronge retweeted
I am sick to my back teeth of this shit.
Her Liberal Democrat colleagues said she was "shoved and sent flying", clearly in the video footage no such thing happened.
Yet the media has jumped on this because that evil Brexit fella is the (wrongly) accused.
Mark Stronge retweeted
Katie Hopkins at Southampton Crown Court for sentencing.
Venues & theatres please take note. Blackmailing venues to cancel is a serious criminal offence.
Mark Stronge retweeted
Just like nobody was prosecuted for thalidomide.
Just like nobody was prosecuted for vioxx.
Just like nobody was prosecuted for the measles vaccine trials.
Just like nobody was prosecuted for bactrim, AZT, dengvaxia etc etc.
Can you see the common theme?
@uTobian @RWMaloneMD
456 PATIENTS DIED
This is one of the biggest medical scandals in British history and there is a decent chance you have never heard of it.
Between 1988 and 2000, patients admitted to Gosport War Memorial Hospital in Hampshire for things like hip fractures and chest infections were routinely put on syringe drivers pumping a steady stream of diamorphine, a powerful opioid. Many were not in pain. Most died within days of being hooked up.
Nurses noticed straight away. In 1988, staff on the Redclyffe Annexe told their managers something was badly wrong. They told their union, the Royal College of Nursing. They kept raising it for years. Management's response was to tell them to stop making waves.
The doctor overseeing the prescribing was Dr Jane Barton. In 2010 the General Medical Council @gmcuk found her guilty of serious professional misconduct in the care of 12 patients. She was not struck off. She retired instead, presumably somewhere with no syringe drivers.
3 separate police investigations by Hampshire Constabulary went absolutely nowhere across 3 decades. Zero prosecutions. Grieving families asking why their relatives died 5 days after routine surgery were treated as the problem.
Then in 2018, after a 4 year inquiry costing 14 million pounds, the Gosport Independent Panel confirmed what those nurses said in 1988.
456 patients died after being given opioids with no medical justification. The panel said probably 200 more died the same way, but their records had gone missing, because of course they had.
Kent Police @kent_police then launched Operation Magenta, reviewing over 750 patient records, taking 1200 witness statements and eventually naming 24 suspects. In November 2025, 7 years into that investigation and 37 years after the first nurse spoke up, police told the families of 101 patients there would be no charges. Their cases did not meet the evidential test. The rest remain under review, with the Crown Prosecution Service @CPSUK holding the final say on any charges, whenever that call finally comes.
So here is where things stand. A regulator confirmed the misconduct. A panel confirmed the cover-up. Nurses were proven right 30 years after the fact. And to this date, not one person has been prosecuted for any of the 456 deaths.
If you raise a concern about patient safety and get ignored for 3 decades, congratulations, you were right all along. Doesn't bring anyone back though.
SOURCES
@guardian
@BBCNews
@Telegraph
@DailyMail
@portsmouthnews
and many others
Mark Stronge retweeted
THEY cooked the books and STILL found 2/3 of us with overdosed folic acid floating in our blood.
All thanks to 40+ years' "voluntary" fortification with this synthetic chemical.
Then they buried the books.
Now they're mandating we eat more of it.
#folicacid #informedconsent
Mark Stronge retweeted
The @WHO claim that “vaccines have saved 154 million lives globally over 50 years” is the epitome of the corruption of science. Here’s why…
Mark Stronge retweeted
For those that haven't been following the Tommy Robinson story... it's INSANE he was convicted of anything.
Back in August 2024 Tommy is on a family holiday in Cyprus posting about the riots, and the Daily Mail decides this is so important it sends a reporter and a photographer all the way to the island to find him, and according to Tommy they even took a photograph of his ex-wife, and then the story goes up and, as he told the jury, within hours people online were posting the name of the hotel he was staying at and telling others to head there, with his kids right there, so his family had to move to a different part of the hotel after he spoke to security, and he ended up leaving the hotel altogether...
...and so what does Tommy do?
He does the exact same thing back to them.
He finds out who wrote it, he hires investigators to locate them, he goes public with it and accuses one of the journalists of “doxxing my children’s location”, he rings one of them up and basically asks whether it would be OK if he did to them what they had done to him, which is literally the whole point, he’s holding up a mirror, and he told the court all he wanted was to question them on camera, the way reporters door-step people every single day, and that it was an attempt to bring the Daily Mail to the table, and even the prosecutor admitted none of it contained direct threats of violence, and yet the people who flew to another country to find him at his hotel are pretending they are the victims, and the man who found where they live and asked them how it feels is the criminal, and the jury couldn’t even agree, it was 10 to 2, and he’s going to be sentenced on December 16 for doing to the Daily Mail exactly what the Daily Mail did to him first, and we’re all supposed to just nod along like this makes perfect sense!!!!!!!
It's PURE INSANITY!!!!!!!
Mark Stronge retweeted
In Downing Street yesterday, Andy Burnham and Angela Rayner met Muslim community leaders around the Cabinet table.
The Prime Minister used the opportunity to take a cheap pot-shot at his political rivals, accusing them of using “unacceptable language” about Islam.
This isn’t the first time Labour politicians have accused their rivals of being “Islamophobic” or sought to police speech about Islam.
Another revelation from the meeting is that Angela Rayner is reportedly set to announce the appointment of an “anti-Muslim hostility” tsar this week.
Rayner appointed five people to a working group tasked with drafting the definition. All had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND.
The Communities Department, which Rayner leads, also said it had deleted all responses to the working group’s consultation — responses that were vital to drafting the definition.
After pressure from Nick Timothy and the threat of legal action from the Free Speech Union, the ministry announced that it did have the responses after all, but would not show them to us.
This has only fuelled speculation that the Government allowed extremists to influence what is now Britain’s de facto Islamic blasphemy law.
Who on earth is she going to appoint as the new Islamophobia tsar?
Watch FSU Campaigns Officer @MaxHThompson 👇
Mark Stronge retweeted
Two days after Henry died Hampshire Police secretly recorded Digwa in a police van speaking Punjabi to his brother. Digwa admitted stabbing Henry. Discussed claiming self defence. Made zero mention of racial abuse. Not one word.
Hampshire Police had that tape.
They knew Digwa was lying about the racist attack. They had the evidence. They had his own words and then tried to smear Henry as the aggressor anyway.
Three days after his death their statement read “it was reported two men had been assaulted by an unknown man.” Henry was the unknown man. The boy bleeding out on the street. They flipped it.
Family complained. Statement changed. Then police told the family their NEXT update would again infer Henry was the initial aggressor. His family had to fight them a second time. While grieving their murdered son.
Then during the trial Hampshire tried to issue a statement telling the public to stop talking about it online. Calling it disinformation. The CPS had to step in. Told them they were about to collapse their own murder case.
This is the force that handcuffed a dying boy. Missed the murder weapon twice. Had a secret tape proving the killer lied. And still tried to bury Henry's name.
That's not incompetence. That's a machine protecting itself. At the expense of a dead boy's reputation and three officers are still on active duty. Not suspended. Treated as witnesses. To their own actions.
Hampshire Police didn't just fail Henry on that street. They kept failing him for six months after he died.
