Pinned Tweet
Replying to @memcculloch
Mike,
I think I have derived particle radius from Energy using QI.
r= √(ħ/(2π√(πE))
Proton=0.878fm
Electron=5.753fm
I also have a related formula for Planck Length from cosmic E
Lp=√(ħ/√(πE))
Values seem to work, Feedback appreciated.
nitter.cf/i/status/2047686814807…
@memcculloch
If you missed it, this was the motivation for the formula. Maybe my rationale is incorrect but the idea of the particle as an anti-information void I think fits well with QI substitutions and the idea of local Planck conditions.
Replying to @mospact21 @memcculloch
@memcculloch
My assumption wasn't that the electron was bouncing between the plates. My hunch was that the particle size is set by the cosmic radius. Smaller d fools the electron into a tighter loop. Then the electron rediscovers the cosmic radius, expands deleting information.
nitter.cf/i/status/2046087483717…
@Franck_McBecker did you see this?
I have reason to think the theoretical thrust might be half of the predicted here but broadly this formula has no area or voltage. Does this map with your experience?
Replying to @memcculloch
Derivation for you to ponder.
E=kTN
=ħad/2πcLp
Δp=ħ/2d
v=Δp/m_e
=ħ/2m_ed
Since ħ/m_e=cλ̄꜀
v=cλ̄꜀/2d
a=v²/d
=(cλ̄꜀/2d)²/d
=c²λ̄꜀²/4d³
E=(ħd/2πcLp)(c²λ̄꜀²/4d³)
=ħcλ̄꜀²/8πd²Lp
Power=(I/e)E
=ħIcλ̄꜀²/8πed²Lp
Force=P/c
F=ħIλ̄꜀²/8πed²Lp
F=2.4x10-⁷(I/d²)

