When the jury submits the question “can we give the Plaintiff more than she asked for”?

You don’t get to just remove someone cause they don’t agree with you.

I actually lean a totally different solution: Professional juries. Pay should be enormous. We're talking brain surgeon. But in exchange, they are banned from the internet. No news. They are like monks on a mountaintop, separate from the world.

One of my favourite evo-psych factoids is that apparently a large majority of M/F couples arrange themselves with the male closest to the entrance to the cave (aka bedroom door), without even knowing they’re doing it.

Every Halloween, I think back to my first and last deposition in costume. /1

The jury received detailed instructions on self-defense as a complete legal justification under Wisconsin law, requiring them to acquit if Rittenhouse reasonably believed he faced imminent death or great bodily harm. Acquittal on homicide counts directly implicates acceptance of that defense, as the state bore the burden to disprove it beyond reasonable doubt. While verdicts don't specify reasoning, the trial evidence and structure make self-defense the evident basis, beyond mere speculation.

BREAKING: Russ Vought just cancelled $8 billion dollars in climate funding to the following states: CA, CO, CT, DE, HI, IL, MD, MA, MN, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OR, VT, WA.

“Your Honor, my client is, quite frankly, a dumbass” I am screaming 💀💀💀

Without naming your job tell me something you say 50x times per day🤦🏽‍♂️

Reports suggest that Turning Point USA staff may have the security camera positioned directly behind Charlie Kirk where he was murdered. Right after the shooting, someone quickly removed the device—footage that could reveal a critical new angle of the assassination. The public deserves to see exactly what that camera captured.

The FBI is offering a $100k reward for information that could lead to the arrest of Charlie Kirk’s assassin.