deano

e/acc

Building somthing crazy for @Enter_Elysium 👀

ok claude use weight-space programming to give my deepseek room temperature iq

HAHAHAHA nitter.cf/djcows/status/21173647…

browser agents have no business being this good already

the strongest predictor of which frontier lab wins is how many employees should have their posting privileges revoked

remember when people were just waiting for ai to blow over?

every chain wants a piece of wall street. the tokenised stock supercycle is already underway. nitter.cf/solana/status/21146105…

the companies issuing the money are now building the rails. @arc reached $1B in USDC within six weeks of mainnet. having distribution before you launch is a hell of a head start. starting to think stablecoins are the whole show this cycle.

a five minute call with the right people can save three days of waiting for replies. if you need it done today, start dialing.

when claude says “i know how you feel”

What does a high creator score actually tell a brand? Is this person influential today, or were they influential five years ago? Do people trust them, or are they just good at getting replies? Is their audience relevant, real and paying attention? Too much of that context disappears into one number. A founder, researcher and video creator bring different things to the table. Scoring them the same way misses why someone would work with them in the first place. It also rewards volume. Posting bait ten times a day is easier to measure than spending a week making something worth watching. Brands need to see recent work, audience fit, credibility and evidence that people actually care or take action. Creators need a way to show what they’re good at beyond keeping the engagement counter moving. What else should a useful creator score account for?

great creators can’t learn something useful without wanting to tell someone about it.

heard gpt 5.6 is crushing the engagement farming benchmarks

Vision and conviction

this is the future im waiting for

Crypto is just money. Some people gamble with it. Some invest it. Some use it to pay for things. Different people want different things from it. No reason it has to serve one purpose.

Honestly, too many KOLs only know one playbook: launch a coin, farm it at $20K, repeat. Nothing built, just value extracted. What I’m working on will change that.

.@binance got hit for $6.3 billion, but its trading fees help explain how it can keep going. Using CZ’s $5 billion annual revenue figure, that averages roughly $159 a second, or $6,342 during this video. That’s estimated revenue before costs, not a live earnings figure. People can pay fees whether they’re buying the rally or selling the panic. The important part for @binance is that they keep trading there.