MyShell.AI

seedance 2.5 vs wan 3.0 is the side-by-side everyone’s posting this week. same prompt, two clips, two price tags. $3.47 and $1.38 in one test, $1.44 and $0.80 in another. plenty of people say the cheaper one looks more real. here’s what we think that price gap does to how people make video: 1/ you get more drafts. at half the cost, a creator who used to render 4 versions now renders 8. the extra 4 are where the good shot usually shows up. 2/ testing moves earlier. cheap renders turn video into something you sketch with. try the lighting, try the pacing, try the ending, then commit. 3/ comparing models becomes part of the job. the posts going viral this week are A/B tests. creators are building their own benchmarks: same prompt, same reference, price in the corner. 4/ the brief gets more valuable. when every model renders a good-looking clip, your prompt, your reference image and your shot list are what make the result recognizably yours. write the identity once, change the shot. 5/ the savings go into length. wan 3.0 runs up to 30 seconds in one take. cheaper seconds mean more creators will try full scenes, short ads and music video cuts. our take: falling prices reward the people with the clearest idea of what they want. the cheaper a render gets, the more a good plan is worth. what’s your go-to video model right now, and what does a clip cost you?

september on myshell, short version: – character consistency: write the identity once, only change the shot – isometric 3D posters: one idea, a whole miniature scene – seedance 2.5 changed how we think about video cost – risograph, the style most filters get wrong in october we're featuring community work. reply with your best gen from september 👇

Aesthetic Analysis | Risograph most "riso" filters just add grain and call it done. real riso prints one ink at a time, so layers never line up perfectly. where two inks overlap you get a third color for free. shading is dots, not gradients. and you only get two or three colors, which is why it looks designed instead of filtered. what we add to the prompt: two-color risograph, fluorescent pink and blue, halftone shading, slight misregistration, uncoated paper texture

Seedance 2.5 costs more per second than 2.0, has no fast tier, and doesn't do 4K. still the bigger update. you can now edit a specific moment in a clip. hand glitches at 0:11 in 2.0? regenerate the whole thing and hope the rest holds. in 2.5 you fix 0:11. with draft mode you explore at 480p and only render 1080p for the one you keep. per-second price matters less than how many gens it takes to get a usable clip. how many does it take you?

People keep asking which model we use. the answer is: yes. image. voice. video. code. agents. tools. picking one is easy. making them work together is the fun part.