Nase Buffett

buat la political compass test tengok korang socially conservative/liberal + fiscally conservative/liberal. aku socially centrist (😝), fiscally liberal (moderate). share korang punya compass: politicalcompass.org/test/en…

People don't understand the mindset of a self-directed man. He understands that the fastest way to upgrade his life is to master the life he already has. He does his current work conscientiously, no matter how small, boring, or unrewarding it might be. He knows that before he can ascend to a greater position, he must first master the one he's in. He is willing to overdeliver. he concentrates fully on what is in front of him. He never allows his environment to dictate his thoughts. He protects his inner world because he understands that his mind is the cause and his reality is the effect. He operates from abundance instead of survival. He doesn't compete for a limited share. he creates value and adds to the whole. He understands that his desire to become more is a reason to develop the capacity to become more. He doesn't wait for the stars to align. he masters what is in front of him today. Few people truly understand this mindset. This is the type of mindset that allows a man to transcend his current circumstances.

Looking back, it's clear that many struggles in life find their roots in bad habits that kids picked up from their parents; if you can simply figure out how to be calm, confident, intellectually curious, emotionally stable, non-judgmental, deeply connected to yourself and entitled to nothing, and manage to marry someone who also strives to be the same, then your kids already have quite a head start.

The problem is not people being uneducated. The problem is that people are educated just enough to believe what they have been taught, and not educated enough to question anything from what they have been taught. —Professor Richard Feynman

"Capitalism created the possibility of the win win win. It used to be a zero sum game where somebody won, somebody else lost. The biggest mistake people make they still think we're in a zero sum world. They're obsessed with some billionaires because Bernie Sanders thinks that @JeffBezos and @elonmusk somehow stole the money from the people. They don't understand that it's this prosperity machine that's creating more, not just for those billionaires, but for everything that they're touching. They're creating value for their customers, they're creating value for their employees. Their suppliers are flourishing, their investors are seeing their capital go up. It can be reinvested and compound. All philanthropy ultimately comes from business. That's where the profits are. Where does all the taxes come from? It ultimately comes from business as well. This is the engine that's lifting humanity out. The entrepreneurs are the drivers of that engine. Somebody like Elon Musk, he gets a very, very, very tiny sliver of the value that he creates for the whole world." — @iamjohnmackey

Peter Thiel has a blunt test for whether a startup team is thinking clearly. Watch how they talk about their own outcomes. His observation: when founders start framing results as luck — "maybe it works, maybe it doesn't, so let's just invest a little and see" — that's not prudent risk management. That's a diagnostic failure. The mechanism is specific. Luck-framing doesn't emerge from humility. It emerges from not having done the analytical work to understand *why* your business will win. If you've truly mapped the competitive dynamics, the customer psychology, the timing — you don't describe the outcome as a coin flip. You describe what needs to be true and why. The portfolio mindset ("let's see what happens") is what you default to when you don't have conviction built on evidence. Thiel's sharpest version of this: the founders of Google, Amazon, and Apple in their early days weren't operating on hope. They had specific theories about why they would win that others couldn't see yet. Bezos mapped out why e-commerce would scale through selection and logistics before the market existed. That's not luck-denial — that's rigorous foresight presented as conviction. When a founding team tells you "we'll figure it out," the question isn't whether they're optimistic. It's whether they can articulate the actual mechanism of their advantage. If they can't, the luck framing isn't a personality trait. It's a capability gap. Blaming luck is what you do when you've stopped thinking.

A Visual Breakdown of The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene: