XAU dominant. NQ selective. Telegram Channel ⤵️ https://nitter.cf/t.co/myRHR92SvR
Joined July 2023
- Tweets4.7K
- Following651
- Followers4.8K
- Likes1.9K
Pinned Tweet
Should I release this one for free tomorrow?
I’ve been building a candle morphology tool that studies what tends to happen after specific candle structures instead of just giving you another buy or sell signal.
It classifies the candle, its shape, its relationship with the previous candle and its EMA context, then compares it with similar historical cases.
You can study things like which side was reached first on the next candle, how often only the high was taken, only the low, both sides, or neither.
Basically, a different way to study candlesticks through statistics instead of memorizing names and patterns.
I still want to run a few more audits and improvements tonight.
If this post gets enough support, I’ll release it free tomorrow night.
Comment Stats and I’ll publish it.
Reactive Just five minutes with Claude, that's all.
tradingview.com/script/9ZPVa…
One indicator I don't talk about much, but always keep in my trading stack, is DaTrend.
I use it to evaluate different market conditions, especially whether we're trading above or below the zero line.
My goal is to avoid going against the overall bias and focus on setups that have a much better chance of playing out in my favor.
I'll be updating the indicator today, but if you'd like to start exploring it, here's the link:
tradingview.com/script/5G7J0…
People have no idea how many months of hard work, research, testing, and countless improvements went into building Ignition.
Yet some genuinely believe you can just spend five minutes talking to Claude and create something like this.
AI can help you write code, but it doesn't replace the knowledge, experience, and thousands of decisions behind building a tool that actually makes sense in real market conditions.
I'll say this without hesitation: FundedNext is the best prop firm for me personally.
I've never had a single issue with them. I consistently receive payouts every few days, and even though I frequently move between countries because I don't have a permanent place of residence, they've never given me any problems.
Not once.
I can only speak from my own experience, but FundedNext has been incredibly reliable for me. @FundedNext
Before taking an Initial Balance breakout, I check the stats behind it.
Here’s how I use IB Edge to read the bias, wait for a pullback, and define my entry, stop and target.
Reply IB and I’ll share the free TradingView link.
In life, focus on what you can contribute to others and stop worrying about what people think of you.
You're the only one who truly knows how much effort you're putting in, how many hours you're working, and what it takes to build something meaningful.
Let people talk.
Just keep doing your work and creating value for others.
Just because you can build good-looking indicators doesn't mean you're a profitable trader.
There are plenty of people building indicators with Claude who have never made even $100 in payouts from a prop firm, and neither have the people following their systems.
There's a big difference between building something that looks impressive on a chart and actually making money trading it.
At some point, your results need to match what you're preaching.
Be consistent with what you say and what you actually do.
Spend some time studying these free indicators if you trade GC or XAUUSD on CFDs.
You might get more out of them than chasing another Market Structure Shift, BOS, CISD, and some CRT setup based on a 54 hour candle aligned with the moon.
Sometimes trading really doesn't need to be that complicated.
tradingview.com/script/k6LBP…
tradingview.com/script/ZIQRZ…
tradingview.com/script/xGJub…
tradingview.com/script/JRERt…
tradingview.com/script/5G7J0…
tradingview.com/script/yS4Je…
I remember posting this back on January 11.
It's honestly crazy how closely price has followed the fractal I projected back then.
You don’t need a 100% win rate. You need the math to work after EVERY failed attempt.
Here’s how 85 accounts could pay nothing and the overall result could still be positive:
100 evaluations × $130 = $13,000 spent.
15 accounts reach one $2,000 payout. At an 80% trader share, that’s $24,000 received.
$24,000 − $13,000 = $11,000 remaining.
All 85 accounts that paid nothing are already included in the cost. Under these assumptions, just 9 payouts would cover the evaluation purchases.
That’s the asymmetry worth understanding. Not a perfect record, but payouts that outweigh the cost of ALL attempts.
Every day is a beautiful day for Reactive.
Free Link Indicator
tradingview.com/script/9ZPVa…
