なゆた (@numakame) header
なゆた (@numakame) profile picture

お絵描き好き、Vtuberリスナー、ブルスカ垢→ https://nitter.cf/t.co/8jYjLht6Eb※イラストの無断転載・無断利用・無断AI学習禁止(FAはご本人様は利用可)

日本 大阪
Joined September 2021
Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)Photo by なゆた (@numakame)
黄泉のツガイのガブちゃん可愛いよね
3
22
2
262
35,036
綺麗な絵というのはそこに至るまでの人間の努力や技術に掛けた時間、その技術の希少性が背景にあって評価されてきたけれど その背景が意識出来ない人は「綺麗な絵自体に価値がある」と勘違いしてしまう 逆にその勘違いが主流になれば先述の全てが無価値になり、絵自体が無価値になってしまう
1
3
114
Boichi先生のメッセージすごく熱いものがある ご自身の立場から最大限公正であろうとする信念と、クリエイターの心と努力、創造性を守ろうとする声を精一杯肯定してくれていることが伝わってくる ちゃんと自分の頭で考えて、何が一番大切なことなのかを考えて考えて考えて自分の言葉で表現しよう
“Regarding the Use of AI-Generated Images in a Dr. STONE Anime Collaboration” (2/2) When a manga adaptation becomes an anime, major publishers do not simply act on behalf of the copyright holders in exercising their rights. They become members of the production committee, invest in production costs, and take part in producing the anime. I don't know whether that was also the case when Dr. STONE was adapted into an anime. However, that is how things work with many productions, so it may have been the case with Dr. STONE as well. I want to emphasize once again that I simply don't know. In any case, publishers generally have the right to be involved in the production and business of an anime. That is why I sent your tweet links to my contact at Jump. I do not believe that the original creator is the owner of the anime. Here is the principle I follow when it comes to my work: The owners of an anime are the creators who made it. Is the original creator a co-owner? Well, legally, or according to the terms of a contract, perhaps. But when it comes to the very nature of art, I believe that the creators of a derivative work are its owners. As a fellow creator, I believe it is my responsibility to respect them and support them so that they can create their work freely. The same applies to the business surrounding derivative works. It is their business. An anime is not made to suit the original creator's tastes, to make them feel good, or to fill them with pride. All that money, all that effort, and the dedication of so many artists are not invested simply to make the original creator happy. The creators of the anime are the ones who should take pride in their work. The viewers are the ones who should enjoy it and feel happy. And most of the revenue belongs to the people who made the anime. Of course, the original creator may receive some money and may also be excited to see their work adapted. But those are not the goals of making an anime. They are simply side effects. That is why an anime or a film can sometimes hurt the original creator deeply, or even make them feel profoundly angry. In my opinion, that is simply something we have to accept. I do not want the creators of the anime or films based on my work to simply reproduce the original in order to spare me from being hurt. I want them to ignore my feelings and my position, and to exercise their creativity to the fullest. As long as I am the original creator, I will hold firmly to this position. Even if they fail, even if I become angry or sad, I will protect their freedom as artists. Rather than telling them to be careful, I will tell them to go ahead and take risks. Even to fail. Seeing Dr. STONE characters generated by AI and used commercially certainly brings back very painful memories for me. As I said in my previous post, I don't like it either. But this is an anime Dr. STONE collaboration. I have to put into practice the very principle I want to protect: a world in which creators are respected. I have to respect the anime creators and the company behind the production. Therefore, the central issue is whether the anime production company approved the collaboration partner's use of AI-generated images. If it did, then I have no choice but to respect that decision. Whatever I feel personally is something I must set aside. And when I read the collaboration partner's statement, it seemed to suggest that this was a matter of having to press a button. It sounds as though the anime production company had not approved it. TRULY, WHAT A STRANGE WORLD WE LIVE TODAY. A world where you have to press a button to prevent something from happening. In this world, you press a button when you want something to happen. But when you don't want something to happen, you should simply have to do nothing. Anyway, after sending your tweet links to Jump, I have no idea what happened next. Neither Jump, the anime production company, nor the collaboration partner has informed me of any response or position they may have taken. And I believe that is how it should be. They might choose to do something out of consideration for the original creator, but it is not something I should demand or expect. The anime business belongs to the anime industry. However, all of this is entirely separate from the actions of readers who cherish the original work, its spirit, and its soul. Readers who protest because they believe the original work has been damaged have every right to do so. You have every right to say that you want to see an anime that properly respects the original work and brings the characters you love to life. You have every right to protest when a business fails to respect the original work and the life of its creator. These are rights that belong to you, not to me. Just as the creators of an anime are its owners, consumers are the owners of its reception and appreciation. It is not only admirable but truly extraordinary when readers care so deeply about manga, mangaka, creativity, and the human spirit that they become angry and speak out against AI-generated content. I believe it is my responsibility to respect the creativity and business of the anime production company. I am prepared to endure the pain, anger, and sadness that may come with doing so. Respecting the extraordinary and remarkable love readers have for manga and human creativity is another one of my responsibilities. It is also my duty. I promise that I will endure even greater pain, anger, and sadness for all of you. It is also my duty to be moved by you, to thank you, and to swear that I will repay you through my creative work, forever. And so, to everyone who expressed their anger over this collaboration: I was truly moved. Thank you so much, from the bottom of my heart. I, Boichi, will repay you forever through creative works made with the human heart and human labor.
4
361
なゆた retweeted
“Regarding the Use of AI-Generated Images in a Dr. STONE Anime Collaboration” (2/2) When a manga adaptation becomes an anime, major publishers do not simply act on behalf of the copyright holders in exercising their rights. They become members of the production committee, invest in production costs, and take part in producing the anime. I don't know whether that was also the case when Dr. STONE was adapted into an anime. However, that is how things work with many productions, so it may have been the case with Dr. STONE as well. I want to emphasize once again that I simply don't know. In any case, publishers generally have the right to be involved in the production and business of an anime. That is why I sent your tweet links to my contact at Jump. I do not believe that the original creator is the owner of the anime. Here is the principle I follow when it comes to my work: The owners of an anime are the creators who made it. Is the original creator a co-owner? Well, legally, or according to the terms of a contract, perhaps. But when it comes to the very nature of art, I believe that the creators of a derivative work are its owners. As a fellow creator, I believe it is my responsibility to respect them and support them so that they can create their work freely. The same applies to the business surrounding derivative works. It is their business. An anime is not made to suit the original creator's tastes, to make them feel good, or to fill them with pride. All that money, all that effort, and the dedication of so many artists are not invested simply to make the original creator happy. The creators of the anime are the ones who should take pride in their work. The viewers are the ones who should enjoy it and feel happy. And most of the revenue belongs to the people who made the anime. Of course, the original creator may receive some money and may also be excited to see their work adapted. But those are not the goals of making an anime. They are simply side effects. That is why an anime or a film can sometimes hurt the original creator deeply, or even make them feel profoundly angry. In my opinion, that is simply something we have to accept. I do not want the creators of the anime or films based on my work to simply reproduce the original in order to spare me from being hurt. I want them to ignore my feelings and my position, and to exercise their creativity to the fullest. As long as I am the original creator, I will hold firmly to this position. Even if they fail, even if I become angry or sad, I will protect their freedom as artists. Rather than telling them to be careful, I will tell them to go ahead and take risks. Even to fail. Seeing Dr. STONE characters generated by AI and used commercially certainly brings back very painful memories for me. As I said in my previous post, I don't like it either. But this is an anime Dr. STONE collaboration. I have to put into practice the very principle I want to protect: a world in which creators are respected. I have to respect the anime creators and the company behind the production. Therefore, the central issue is whether the anime production company approved the collaboration partner's use of AI-generated images. If it did, then I have no choice but to respect that decision. Whatever I feel personally is something I must set aside. And when I read the collaboration partner's statement, it seemed to suggest that this was a matter of having to press a button. It sounds as though the anime production company had not approved it. TRULY, WHAT A STRANGE WORLD WE LIVE TODAY. A world where you have to press a button to prevent something from happening. In this world, you press a button when you want something to happen. But when you don't want something to happen, you should simply have to do nothing. Anyway, after sending your tweet links to Jump, I have no idea what happened next. Neither Jump, the anime production company, nor the collaboration partner has informed me of any response or position they may have taken. And I believe that is how it should be. They might choose to do something out of consideration for the original creator, but it is not something I should demand or expect. The anime business belongs to the anime industry. However, all of this is entirely separate from the actions of readers who cherish the original work, its spirit, and its soul. Readers who protest because they believe the original work has been damaged have every right to do so. You have every right to say that you want to see an anime that properly respects the original work and brings the characters you love to life. You have every right to protest when a business fails to respect the original work and the life of its creator. These are rights that belong to you, not to me. Just as the creators of an anime are its owners, consumers are the owners of its reception and appreciation. It is not only admirable but truly extraordinary when readers care so deeply about manga, mangaka, creativity, and the human spirit that they become angry and speak out against AI-generated content. I believe it is my responsibility to respect the creativity and business of the anime production company. I am prepared to endure the pain, anger, and sadness that may come with doing so. Respecting the extraordinary and remarkable love readers have for manga and human creativity is another one of my responsibilities. It is also my duty. I promise that I will endure even greater pain, anger, and sadness for all of you. It is also my duty to be moved by you, to thank you, and to swear that I will repay you through my creative work, forever. And so, to everyone who expressed their anger over this collaboration: I was truly moved. Thank you so much, from the bottom of my heart. I, Boichi, will repay you forever through creative works made with the human heart and human labor.
7
109
9
570
18,084
なゆた retweeted
“Regarding the Use of AI-Generated Images in a Dr. STONE Anime Collaboration” (1/2) Recently, we were faced with a situation in which a company collaborating with the Dr. STONE anime used AI-generated images in its advertising. Many of you who love Dr. STONE on X took this issue seriously and spoke up about it. The collaborating company also issued an official apology. All of this was made possible by you. Yes, Truly! Your presence, and the love you have for manga, mangaka, and the works themselves, is what made me decide to share my artwork on X again after eleven months. nitter.cf/Boichi_Bo1/status/2108… You are also the reason things are different now from the days when the internet was a jungle. You are people who are willing to stand up against anything in the world to protect works created through human lives, human effort, and human dedication. I sincerely thank you. Thank you so much! However, separate from my gratitude and the way this particular incident was handled, I do not oppose the use of AI by companies collaborating with anime productions. To be clear, not opposing something does not mean supporting it in any way. I am neither in favor of it nor against it. My position is entirely personal and has absolutely nothing to do with the views of Inagaki-sensei, the original story writer of Dr. STONE, or Shonen Jump and Shueisha. That is why, this time as well, all I did was send links to your tweets to my editor at Jump. I made no other comments and took no further action. Why do I hold this position? And why do I refrain from making comments or taking a stance? Why, when I once went so far as to stop taking medication for a chronic illness and give up meals in protest against social media companies' unauthorized AI training on artists' work and their use of it, do I take such a different position on this particular incident? There are two reasons I want to share with you. First, when it comes to collaborations involving my own works, if there is an agreement and prior consultation regarding the use of AI, I do not oppose it. As I have said many times, I like AI technology and have an optimistic outlook on its potential. What I do not like is being robbed and humiliated. I do not like theft or humiliation, whether it is committed by a corporation or an individual, regardless of what technology is involved. That is why, if there is an agreement and mutual understanding, I do not oppose it. But that does not mean I like it. I may not like it, but I do not oppose it either. Collaboration businesses do not exist to serve my personal wishes. A work is like a child and it does not exist to live for the sake of its parents. It lives its own life. And sometimes, things happen that its parents may not like. Collaborations are undertaken for the benefit of the collaborating companies. So, if someone asks me whether they can use AI for a collaboration involving one of my works, my answer would be, "I really, really don't like it." But that is not the same as opposing it. The second reason is even more important. The company involved in the AI-generated images that sparked this controversy is not a collaborator on the original manga. It is a collaborator on the anime adaptation. As the original manga creator, I have no intention of taking a position or making any demands regarding this matter. Once again, I want to emphasize that this is my own personal position and has nothing to do with Inagaki-sensei's views. Furthermore, Shueisha and Jump are entitled to express their own views and make their own demands regarding collaborations involving the anime. This is because publishers and magazines do far more than simply administer rights and share copyright revenue. To be continued.
“I’m going to Post My Drawings Again” On December 24, 2025, X launched a service that allowed people to modify, transform, and rework artwork using AI without the creator’s consent. I desperately hoped that the unbelievable news could not possibly be true. But I eventually confirmed it was. So I took down all of my artwork from X and wrote about what had happened. Many people read my post and supported me. Later, one prominent figure in the American comics industry told me that what I did was the first such action taken by a well-known creator, and that it had a significant impact. I am deeply grateful for that assessment, but honestly, I don't really know what to make of it. All I know is that after it happened, I threw away all the medication I was supposed to take, stopped eating, and lay down. All the memories and wounds I had carried inside me came rushing back, and they made me lose the will to do anything. I have seen—and experienced—a world in which a mangaka has to endure so much pain simply because they want to live as a creator who draws, as a mangaka. Many aspiring manga artists around the world who post their manga and artwork on X probably do so because they desperately want, somehow, to become mangaka. Even that, in itself, is a kind of violence inflicted by reality upon young students who hold such a simple dream. And for aspiring artists from poor countries, who are already living in poverty, that violence can be especially cruel. What I... what we want is not something grand. Most of us, astonishingly, accept rather calmly as AI tries to take our jobs and even mocks us. We are hurt. We suffer. And yet we accept it quietly. We do not block the streets or set cars on fire to defend our work and exercise what should be the most basic rights of people living in a democracy. What we want is very simple. The drawings we create after giving up so much of the joy and happiness of life, drawing alone in solitude and hardship—they belong to us, the creators. All we ask is that they be recognized as ours. Do not take them casually. Do not use them casually. And certainly do not use them to mock us. And even—even—do not use them to take away our work and our dreams. Even—even, even—many of us have already spent our lives enduring humiliation and theft. I have seen a manga artist leave this world because of it. All of those wounds burst open again on December 24, 2025. And I lost the will to go on and simply lay there. Five days passed. Then Hiroya Oku-sensei, having heard what had happened to me, sent me a message. Hiroya Oku-sensei is the most warm-hearted person I know. I have met many manga creators in South Korea, Japan, and around the world who have warm hearts and extraordinary empathy. Among all these wonderful people, Hiroya Oku-sensei had one of the warmest hearts of all. His message was filled with an almost boundless warmth. It gave me the strength to get back on my feet. I started eating again. I went to the hospital and got my medication again. And from that moment, for the next three months, I worked harder than usual for aspiring manga artists around the world. For this work, my friend, Steve came from Canada to Japan and lived with me for a month. He and I had been dreaming together and imagining the future of manga around the world together. So when we are going to work hard, we have to do it together. During that period, I met people involved in the manga business in South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia, North America, and several other countries. I drew a manga for Zimbabwe. I met with JICA. I met Hiroko Oda-sensei. And I did many other things that I still cannot reveal. Once I had gotten back on my feet and looked back, I realized that this year had been incredibly difficult. Several projects that carried many of my dreams fell apart. It was because I was not good enough. There were also a few occasions when I felt that I had been treated unfairly. But that is life. I did not get back up because I thought everything would suddenly become bright and happy. Pain is what gives a work its soul. That is what exists inside the drawings and manga we create. And because our lives are like that, we treasure the works we create. I only posted artwork when I had to endure the pain of doing so for promotional purposes or to deliver an important message. I did not post any Dr. STONE artwork on X during the final season of the anime. And so about ten months passed. Recently, after discussing it with Steve, I decided to start posting my manga and artwork on X again. There are two reasons. First, the vast majority of manga readers and fans did not use AI services to participate in that kind of violence. Quite the opposite. Many of them made efforts to stop it. Having lived through an era when the internet was a jungle, I find this phenomenon to be one of the great moments in human history. The second reason is that X has made some changes to its policies to protect the interests of creators themselves rather than those of people who steal from them. Yea, it is only a small step, but I thought it could become the beginning of something good. When I took my artwork down from X, I said that I believed X could become a place that stood up for creators, and that when that day came, I would post my work there again. The changes X has made to its policies are not proof that X has become such a place. They are simply an important change. But I believe it was the readers who made X move in that direction. These are the same people who fought to make sure manga would not simply be given away for free. They are the people who are willing to pay when a good manga industry is built. And I believe they will continue to protect manga, manga artists, and human beings who draw. With my gratitude to everyone, I have decided to begin sharing my work again, starting with the release of Sunday’s Momonga: Zimbabwe Adventure. Thanks for all the fish. But I never left. I come back.
38
754
72
4,362
211,443
タイムラインにかわいいマイクロブタちゃんが💕
1
244
12
1,030
14,846
なゆた retweeted
2
498
30
5,992
61,546
いつでもトンカツが食べられるくらいになりなよ……って、健康的な意味でもあったのか……
37
マジで俺カツが食えない体になってきたかも知れん 胃が……胃がああぁぁぁぁ!!
3
99
なゆた retweeted
ホロライブの地図担当なのじゃ! #めら組絵図
1
154
1,209
10,269
注意
9
27
4
872
97,989
過程
157
368
229
4,449
699,466
ひとつお願いです!💭 音乃瀬奏のAIイラストについては、ファンアートタグ「 # Artnose 」を付けずに投稿してもらえると嬉しいです! ファンアートタグは、おまえらのみんなが描いてくださったイラストを見つける場所として大切にしたいと思っています! ご理解いただけると嬉しいです!🙏✨️
146
3,857
222
25,375
1,173,332
『映画好きだけど…めっちゃ観ている人に比べたら全然観てないし、でもあまり映画観ない人に比べたらめちゃくちゃ観ている方だと思う。』 伝われ、このニュアンス
73
2,449
466
15,769
541,517
【 お仕事 】 橘ひなのさん/ スーパーときめきヒロイン アニメーション箇所の仕上げ等でお手伝いさせていただきました! とても素敵な作品に携われて嬉しかったです✨️
/ ✨プレミア公開のお知らせ \ ⏰11/11 21:00- このあとすぐ!   スーパーときめきヒロイン / 橘ひなの 作詞・作曲:本多友紀(EverNest)様 編曲:脇 眞富 様 ▼待機所 youtu.be/brhQkxxZbxM?si=lVPV…
4
50
6
335
12,650
勝手な想像だけど 推進一辺倒で来てた所に世論や世界情勢に圧されて規制案を急に考え出すから 解析系AIや識別系AIにも影響出るような世界一厳しい罰則設けてしまって、最初から生成AIの問題点に向き合って考えておけば良かったのにねってオチになりそうな気がする
96
注意されるという行為を「行為に対しての注意」単体ではなく「自分の人格すべてを否定された」 と感じると、その場から立ち去る選択肢を選ぶ方が楽ですからね。 (やる必要は本来無いが)人格から来る行動原理の修正コスト払わずに済むから… しかし、実は「ごめんなさい次から気をつけます」と行為に対して謝罪をすると、人格修正コストを払わずに自分の行動に対しての反省を表明できるから圧倒的に謝罪したほうが得なんだぞ…! 自己肯定感低いがち完璧主義の心病みがち人これよくなるからね、実生活でも切り離し練習頑張ろうね…☺️
リスナーにとって注意されるって、わりと害悪認定&死刑宣告に等しい。 だから「謝ったところでもうその枠には居られないな、謝るまでもなく消えよう」 ってリスナーが結構いるんじゃない? 謝る=そこで多少なりともやりとりが発生して枠主の時間を取ることになるわけだしな
14
72
11
326
39,331
そうなんです 開発元が大規模に著作物を無断利用しているので、出力したものが知らずに著作権侵害している可能性がある 確認してから使えばいいという考えもあるでしょうけど、とても確認しきれるとは思えないので出力物は直接使わない方が無難です
アプリでAI挿絵がきれいにできるので無料のとこで使うならいいかーと軽い気持ちでいたのですが、ふとそのAI挿絵を検索にかけたら「これは某有名作品のイラストレーターさんの絵ですね!」って断言されて、こういうことか…😨と青ざめました。消しました。もう使わない。怖え。
3
343
1
1,394
47,758
それって手描きも一緒じゃないのと思う人もいるだろうけど、「知らなくてもアウト」なのが違う所 手描きは偶然の一致を証明出来れば著作権侵害にはならないけど、生成AIはデータセットに元著作物があったら出力者が意図してなくても著作権侵害というのが現状文化庁資料の見解
1
13
76
2,482
なゆた retweeted
無断転載された上で、それを勝手に生成AIに読み込んできもいキメラ生み出されるの 子供を誘拐されて、臓器売買用に臓器取り出されるのと同じくらいの嫌悪感なんだけど 理解されないよな
6
167
5
961
13,026