Chelsea fans were Comparing him with santos.
Even your enzo wouldn't challenge a fit lavia. Go and ask jorginho and kovacic
You see that no 4, very vital.
My guy thief something wey resemble jelly from him babe house, we gather apply am for 2 weeks and we started looking so fine
No security= community police and local vigilante groups
No water= Borehole drilling in every compound
No electricity= generator and solar and inverter
No kerosene and gas= Firewood and charcoal
No roads= stones
No good medical service= Native
Na coping Alternatives go kill us
Not just feed, I don't like when we water down the responsibilities of parents and immediate family to just "feeding".
If anything happens to you, na your parents and immediate family go follow bear the consequences so you owe them respect and values like mad untill you go off
Well, pidgin is only common in the south south.
You can go a whole day in some states in the east, north and west without hearing pidgin.
When the bible said "For the love of money is the root of all evil" walai talai, e no lie.
Very soon, you go understand better
Nakupenda
I won't lie, our wingers won't even hit up to 10 goals this season with this Maresca system.
Because they have to beat 1, 2 men before they even get space to shoot. That's how Maresca's style is.
No direct runs.
No freedom in the final third.
They have to stay touchline.
Everything is slow, sideways, and predictable.
Spoken well
🚨🎙️ Thierry Henry on Jesús Owono’s life-ending challenge on Jesús de Miguel during the FC Andorra vs Tenerife match.
“Honestly, I’ve watched that incident so many times, and I still struggle to understand what happened. Every time they show the replay, I find myself shouting at the television. I don’t know how you leave your goal, come out for a one-on-one challenge and raise your knee that high towards another player’s chest.
What exactly are you trying to achieve in that situation?
As a goalkeeper, you have to understand the danger of that kind of challenge. You can come out and clear the ball without putting another player’s safety at risk.
“What really hurts me is that football is supposed to bring people happiness. We play this game to entertain millions of people, to create memories and to give supporters something to celebrate. Nobody should go onto a football pitch and never come home again.
“And now, Owono will wake up tomorrow, put on his boots and probably return to training at some point.
But what about Jesús de Miguel’s family?
What happens to the people who were waiting for him at home?
What do you tell his parents,
his brothers,
his friends? They have lost someone they can never replace. I don’t think we spend enough time thinking about the families who are left behind after tragedies like this.
“I also think we need to have a serious conversation about punishment.
A red card is a football punishment. But when an incident has consequences this devastating, can we honestly say that a red card is enough?
I’m not saying we should rush to judgment without an investigation, but if reckless conduct is established, the punishment must reflect the seriousness of what happened.
In the most serious cases, I believe a lifetime ban should be considered. Players need to understand that there is a responsibility that comes with stepping onto a football pitch, and that responsibility includes protecting one another.
“I’m not saying this because I want to see another footballer’s career destroyed. I’m saying it because we cannot keep treating player safety as something secondary. If stronger consequences are necessary to prevent another family from experiencing this kind of tragedy, then football authorities must be prepared to act.
“My deepest condolences go to Jesús de Miguel’s family, his teammates, everyone at Tenerife and all those who loved him. I cannot imagine their pain. And I hope they are given all the support they need during this incredibly difficult time.
“Rest in peace, Jesús. No football match should ever end with a family losing someone they love.”
And how i can I forget the most prestigious line.
"Who will replace the irreplaceable"
"We are selling our best midfielder"
"If we sell Enzo, we are finished"
"Our best player"
"He is like lampard"
"He is the face of the club"
"If he goes to city, they will appreciate him"
Wetin my eyes no see for here.
Best midfielder una
TheBOYisGOOD💙 retweeted
Enzonzi stans within the Chels fanbase told us he’d be moving to City where he’ll get appreciated more when he’s surrounded by better players only for the City fanbase to hate him more than ours has ever did already so poetic 😂😂😂
"If he dey come next time, give am knee"
"As you dey come out to punch ball, give am elbow"
African coaches have always encouraged their goalkeepers to attack aerial balls aggressively. Even from my own experience playing football, I wouldn't bother challenging a goalkeeper for a 60/40 ball because I know how brutal they can be.
In this particular incident, I don't even think the striker could have avoided the collision because he never saw the goalkeeper coming. They were only around the halfway line, so why would a goalkeeper come out and challenge for the ball with that level of aggression?
Personally, I think the goalkeeper deliberately went in hard on the striker, even if I don't believe his intention was to kill him.
God bless you.
Pepe was known for recklessness and got cheered for it.
Most recklessness fouls are intentional.
I be defender, I know what I'm saying. Clumsy fouls are so much different reckless fouls
“If you miss the ball, don’t miss the leg”—the words of some coaches and the mentality of some players. Yet you claim reckless tackles are always unintentional.
Some coaches even instruct players to injure an opponent who is “disturbing” them, and some players gladly comply. In fact, some players start games intending to take out a particular opponent by injuring him.
We should not pretend players never deliberately ignore the ball and go for an opponent’s leg or body. I am a footballer; even in training we make deliberate reckless tackles for malicious reasons, and fights break out between teammates over them. You think a player who recklessly tackles his own teammate would not do the same to an opponent?
Yes, the outcome for the one under scrutiny is sad and not what was intended, but we cannot deny the intentionality of the action.
Two truths can co-exist.






















