I think it's interesting that the allegation, that there was an orchestrated campaign involving Matt, is general; but the denials are specific and not also general: He was not in a group chat, that he was not paid, etc..
1
5
3,132
This is just incredible double speak from the NYT. Calling vocal supporters an "army of influencers" is just wild.
1
114
3,108
TBH, most people only learn the word “McKinsey” to put a name to something they already hate. Revulsion is McKinsey’s most prevalent context. It’s like NYT saying someone had to pay influencers to say barf is gross.
18
1,921
The funny thing is this article will probably marginally increase distrust in trad media and push people toward influencers, further subordinating the NYT position. Oh well! Lmao (Yes that’s not the “point” of coverage but you can tell that’s their motivation)
2
12
725
Anyone who doesn’t think McKinsey is dunk worthy is clearly not paying attention.
1
630
Am I going to be the only one to point out that this slanderous story was published by two Jewish reporters? Don't forget how they killed Jesus. Slander
3
3
785
This was the final straw. Only a cooking app subscriber now.
7