💧 Paul 🇦🇺🦘For Ukraine 🇺🇦

Never one to follow a subtle agenda, Segal directs us to the key groups she sees as driving alleged antisemitism. Neo-nazis, you say? White supremacists? Racists who do Heil H*tler salutes and stand on the steps of NSW Parliament calling for the end of Jewish people and their deaths? Actual antisemites? Well no, not so much. Segal reassures us that: 'far-right antisemitism has not been the primary source of concern or anxiety to members of the Jewish community recently.' Okay then. I would have thought people threatening to kill me would be far more troubling than a person wearing a scarf or wanting an end to war in Palestine. But anyway, let's guess what Jillian claims is the main source? Yes, you guessed it. It is the fault of the far-left and modern progressives. In fact, Segal devotes 781 words and 5 footnotes to telling us how awful the progressives are but only 250 words and zero footnotes elaborating on the neo-Nazi, far right threat, an increase of 211% in the amount of analysis devoted to progressives. But perhaps people who spend time organising Marxist revolutionary agendas against the government just require more page space. .

I've been reading through this, which was released today, and let me tell you - it is a hot mess. Jillian Segal (well let's face it, the taxpayer-funded team who work for her) has delivered a line of limited thinking that aims to insert itself into every aspect of Australian life - with no peer review, or any form of independent assessment. We are expected to simply take the Antisemitism Envoy at their word and shut up. As usual, it presents as a wandering discourse of unevidenced claims, taking particular aim at the increasing dissatisfaction with Israel by most of the western world and hiding it within the cloak of 'antisemitism' - a word tossed about freely throughout the document, a word that underwrites the document and all it's radical thought-policing, but a word that they fail to provide with any concrete definition or cohesive meaning. .