Peter Lin (@peter9863) header
Peter Lin (@peter9863) profile picture

Research Scientist. ByteDance Seed (Seedance, Seedream, more)

New York
Joined January 2014
Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)Photo by Peter Lin (@peter9863)
Few-Step Generation via Data-Space Iteration Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.12102 We rethink the iterative process behind few-step generation. Instead of iterating in flow space, we propose data-space iteration as a new paradigm for better few-step generation. Details in the thread!
8
66
11
491
89,562
Adversarial Flow Models is accepted at ICML. Continuous Adversarial Flow Models is accepted at ECCV. Heading to Seoul next week. See you all at #ICML.
10
1
110
8,541
Peter Lin retweeted
Introducing Omni, one unified model can support any-to-any multimodal modeling, including multimodal understanding, image/video generation and editing, world modeling and 3D reconstruction. All in one that adopts standard mixture-of-experts arch with only 3B activations.
9
27
8
225
33,412
Continuous Adversarial Flow Models (CAFMs) Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2604.11521 Flow matching generates poor samples without guidance because the MSE loss induces incorrect generalization. Instead of an isotropic Euclidean distance, we need a manifold-aware criterion—but how can we obtain it? CAFMs bring adversarial training to continuous time. Learning velocity with a discriminator induces better generalization because the discriminator as a criterion can learn the manifold! Also unlike flow matching’s forward KL objective, adversarial training allows optimizing different divergences. CAFMs can generate sharper and higher-quality samples. Adversarial training in continuous time also avoids the vanishing gradient problem, leading to stable training. CAFMs can be trained from scratch or used to post-train existing flow models. Post-training SiT/JiT for just 10 epochs yields large FID improvements. We also observe significant GenEval and DPG improvements when post-training text-to-image models. More details in this thread!
11
66
9
512
265,248
5. Conclusion and thoughts Our Adversarial Flow line of research explores ways to integrate adversarial modeling and flow modeling, two of the most influential paradigms in generative modeling. Adversarial Flow Models (AFMs) bring adversarial training to discrete-time flow modeling. Now, Continuous Adversarial Flow Models (CAFMs) further extend this idea to continuous time. I think being able to do adversarial training in continuous time will unlock many more interesting explorations! Our method is also different from guidance. Both CAFM and FM ensure convergence to the empirical distribution (i.e., the overfitted ground-truth distribution). They differ only in their finite-capacity generalization, while still remaining faithful to the original distribution. In contrast, guidance does not guarantee faithfulness to the original distribution. Guidance can lead to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, canonical samples, and other distortions. Accurately and faithfully generating the original data distribution remains an important area of research. We do not claim that CAFMs can always generate high-quality samples without guidance. When training samples are sparse or contain outliers, the manifold learned by the discriminator is not guaranteed to be correct. Guidance can still be applied orthogonally to achieve low-temperature sampling. Recently, representational latent spaces (RAE) have become a popular research direction. These methods change the data space in which flow matching operates and therefore implicitly affect the model’s generalization. However, they do not directly address the problem of MSE and require operating in latent space. CAFMs directly modify the loss objective to induce different generalization and work effectively even in pixel space. Other representation-alignment approaches (REPA), may also have implicit connections to our work. We hope our work inspires further insights in the research community.
1
1
12
1,594
APT2 is accepted at NeurIPS 2025! Real-time interactive video generation up to 1 minute @ 720p 24fps through autoregressive adversarial post-training. Come to our poster at: - San Diego Convention Center - Wed, Dec 3, 2025 • 4:30 PM – 7:30 PM PST - Exhibit Hall C,D,E # 4302
1
17
921
Our research: Adversarial Flow Models (AF) arxiv.org/abs/2511.22475 AF unifies Adversarial and Flow Models. Unlike GANs, AF learns optimal transport (stable). Unlike CMs, AF only trains on needed timesteps (save capacity). We can train super-deep 112-layer 1NFE model! SOTA FIDs!
13
78
9
557
43,009
Introducing Seaweed APT2, a real-time, interactive, streaming video generation model. seaweed-apt.com/2 Adversarial training for autoregressive modeling! Streaming 1 minute videos, 1 diffusion step, 24fps real-time on 1xh100, with interactive controls!
14
36
16
192
20,638
APT2 can also be used for real-time interactive virtual human generation. These human avatars are rendered in real time!
1
2
8
1,421
APT2 is an early research work. We believe it is a promissing direction for real-time interactive video generation. I am at #CVPR2025 this week in Nashville. Happy to connect and discuss our work in person.
2
1
12
1,126