#BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy jury tells the judge they cannot reach a unanimous verdict.

Sep 1, 2026 · 4:18 PM UTC

38
15
1
832
12,995
RelevantRecentLikes
I called it last week.
8
91
Imagine being those three dudes on that jury having to convince a retarded hen baby murder is bad.
1
6
156
Right now, the best option is to have a hung jury. This will reset everything. New judge, new jury, and hopefully they’ll be sequestered this time. Hopefully they’ll get logical people on the jury. They should have immediately removed the pink wearing people yesterday. But I’m wondering if the prosecution wanted to let it go so that they could get the hung jury? I don’t know but this just sounds like the right thing, reset and start again.
1
4
94
Man I really used to think women should have all the same rights as men.
1
4
117
Telling women they can’t kill their kids… Women:
4
75
They have to go home to consult the crystals
1
3
98
I hate to say it but hung jury is best case scenario. The next jury NEEDS to be sequestered.
2
35
As a libertarian, I believe government should stay out of parenting.
1
1
190
Yeah its over. Only 1/3 of hung cases are retried, do you think that is going to happen here?
1
51
C’mon now - anyone who thought the outcome would be any different are the real fools. The Longhouse has control of this one, boys - sorry. Any dude expecting a female juror to approach this trial as a man would is expecting a cat to bark.
1
74
It’s okay to murder if you’re crazy.🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️ what a precedent.
27
That’s at least better than an acquittal (or ng by insanity).
61
I have tried every way to mute this story but it keeps populating. It's a dumb story. If the news didn't grab it, it would have been open and shut verdict. It's not interesting nor does it matter to your life. Just drama for stupid people
10
Women have a hard time with important decisions. They intuit something dumb and will defy all logic and evidence to defend it.
14
Something caused her to do it. We know it wasn't PPP, but it was something incredibly, equally terrifying. What juror would be comfortable letting her back into society, ESPECIALLY when she's still able to have children?
35
Damit! it all started out well, then they had to deliberate.
2
30
I’m starting to think the abrahamic religions were right about women.
1
15
Those 3 men holding on for dear life
1
29
Everyone from New England knows what 9 Massachusetts white woman Fe going to do
1
18
Entirely unsurprising... The jury has been given complicated instructions, rightly, and the NGRI rules they are required to follow make a verdict very difficult Jurors don't get to use simplistic, moralistic judgements like those littering social media; they have to do a thorough job I've said it before and I'll say it again, Clancy will almost certainly not be convicted of murder, and if I were on the jury I'd vote not guilty...not because of ideology or morality, which is not a jurors job...based purely on the evidence and NGRI rules as they stand i could not convict People might not like the rules, but Clancy's rights remain, independently of who approves of them And those are rights everyone has, and should have Take care not to rage away your own legal protections
1
1
51
Women... am i right??
4
I think we all saw this coming
35
I’m not shocked.
18
As a libertarian… oh wait, I’d never say that because I’m not a cocksucking libertarian faggot. 🤣
2