Calling it a '$3 trillion debt gamble' skips the key question: who carries the risk? Most of this capex comes from cash-rich hyperscalers, not overleveraged startups. The real test is whether AI revenue catches up before the depreciation bills come due. – at Mapusa, India
This chart says a lot about where enterprise AI is heading…
The biggest security priorities are now AI agents, AI SOCs, offensive AI and AI code security…
As AI gets deeper access to systems and more autonomy, the attack surface changes with it…
Cybersecurity is one of the biggest second-order winners of the AI boom
In a single year, AI has rewritten the security priority list for CISOs.
Attackers are moving faster. Bain estimates AI compresses a typical cyberattack from about four weeks to about 18 hours, and models keep getting better at finding and exploiting weaknesses.
There's also more to protect, with employees shipping apps they couldn't have built a year ago and agents getting access to source code, documents, and production systems.
In a survey of 100 CISOs at companies with 1,000+ employees, all seven of the most-selected 2027 priorities involve AI.
The biggest jumps since 2026:
- Internal AI agent security (+28 pts)
- AI SOC (+26 pts)
- AI offensive security (+24 pts)
- AI code security (+23 pts)
- AI vulnerability remediation (+22 pts)
Last year's staples:
- Exposure & vulnerability management (-21 pts)
- SIEM / security data (-18 pts)
- Privileged access management (-18 pts)
From a16z's @OwenColby and @steph_zhang on The New Security Agenda: a16z.news/p/the-new-security…
As someone who has always hated the word “moat,” I’m very much on board with this…
There was never a permanent moat. There isn’t one now. And there probably never will be…
The only durable advantage is the ability to keep moving faster than the world around you…
What I find fascinating is how the AI boom keeps revealing new bottlenecks…
Everyone talks about models and GPUs, but memory is becoming just as strategic…If SK Hynix is effectively sold out through 2029, that tells you how far ahead the infrastructure buildout is being planned…
Sometimes the best way to understand a technology cycle is to watch which “boring” component suddenly becomes impossible to buy…
I think this is one of the clearest signs of what a mature startup ecosystem actually looks like…
The real impact of an Anthropic IPO at this scale would go far beyond the founders. You could have hundreds of employees suddenly sitting on life-changing liquidity, many of them technical, ambitious and already trained inside one of the most important AI companies in the world…
That money will not just buy houses and index funds…A lot of it will flow back into startups, angel investing, new labs and new companies…
This is how ecosystems compound…One great company creates the capital, confidence and talent for the next generation…
The Anthropic mafia could end up being a very real thing
Who actually gets rich if Anthropic lists at $2 trillion?
The S-1 filed on Monday lets us answer from the filing itself.
The reported target is $1.5T to $2T, listing the week of November 16. The filing implies about 16.9B fully diluted shares. So $2T works out to roughly $118 a share.
The cap table at $2T:
- $199B for the 7 controlling co-founders, about 10%
- $28B for Ben Mann, if his stake matches theirs
- $100B for the Anthropic Public Benefit Fund, 5%
- $331B in employee options and RSUs, about 17% , That pool covers about 5,300 employees, an average of $62M each.
- But when you joined matters enormously.
The S-1 shows how much equity was granted each year, and at what price. [
Headcount went from about 300 to 500 in late 2023, to 940 at end 2024, to 5,300 now.
Match the two, and here is roughly how many people made what at $2T:
- $110M to $400M each: ~300 to 500 people hired by 2023
- $200M to $300M each: ~440 to 640 hired in 2024
- $70M to $95M each: ~1,360 hired in 2025
- $10M to $20M each: ~3,000 hired in 2026
So about 940 people hired by the end of 2024 average nine figures. Everyone hired since averages eight figures.
The 2024 class is the surprise. That year Anthropic granted 1.28B options at $1.30 a share. At $118, that one year of grants is worth about $133B.
Then there is the tender. In April, holders could sell at $25.91 a share. Investors lined up $6B, but only $4.7B sold.
Weeks later, Series H priced at $58.90 a share. At $2T, the people who held would be up 4.6x. And Dario and Daniela Amodei were among the sellers.
The 7 founders have pledged 80% of their equity to charity. That is about $159B at $2T. But the S-1 says the pledges are not legally binding.
A 30B open model beating frontier models on finance research, at 11x lower cost. If small, specialised models keep closing the gap, the capex story behind giant frontier models gets a lot harder to defend. Domain depth may matter more than sheer scale. – at Mapusa, India
Introducing Samaya Sterling, our new model post-trained for challenging financial research that outperforms the frontier! Sterling started off as a two person research effort to see if we could increase efficiency in agentic orchestration. To our surprise we were able to post-train a much smaller model (Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, a 30B mixture-of-experts model with 3B active parameters) to greater accuracy (58.9% vs 55.9% on FrontierFinance) and 11x lower cost ($0.61 vs $6.89) than Claude Fable 5.1, the best performing frontier model.
We did this via a four-stage training process, two stages of SFT where the model first learns to research with our financial tools and how to construct a good agentic research strategy. The second two stages are RL, with an offline GRPO stage where the model further hones its research strategy from eight teachers that provide diverse approaches, and an online GRPO stage where the model can make end to end attempts and learn from its mistakes.
We see substantial gains from the co-adaptation of the model and harness through post-training, both through the model learning to effectively use the high-quality financial tools, and better compaction approaches that let even a small model execute on longer and deeper research.
We are exploring multiple follow-up directions, from multi-agent research swarms using this small model, to training firm-specific models to encode unique judgement, to training a larger model, where early results show even greater gains from the training process.
The full research is linked below!
My new read!
Looking forward to reading the finished treatise on the recent history of India UAE relations by the inimitable @navdeepsuri !! – at Garhi Harsaru, India
On the rocking jets of @Emirates bro!!
YouTube is becoming the default television network of the internet…
Netflix still has incredible shows and enormous cultural reach, but YouTube has something structurally powerful: an effectively infinite content engine, every niche imaginable, creators publishing continuously, and an algorithm that keeps learning what you want to watch…
The interesting question is whether traditional streaming can keep competing for time, because that seems to be the metric YouTube is quietly winning
Feels like the security debt of the last 20 years is starting to come due…
Phones, browsers, certificates, programming languages, IoT… everything is interconnected, and AI is making it much cheaper to probe the weak links at scale…
Absolutely bullish that cybersecurity is about to become one of the defining industries of the next decade
In the last 24 hours:
1. iPhone 11 through 16 are apparently vulnerable to remote attacks.
2. SSL certificates are broken until browsers remove eMudhra CA.
3. PHP >9 vulnerability CVE published (tomorrow).
The world is about to witness things that have never been seen before.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The post's iPhone claim is inaccurate; a leaked Cellebrite forensic tool targets a Bluetooth bug patched in iOS 26.5 and does not affect updated devices. The eMudhra CA and PHP issues are real incidents but framed sensationally.
justin.sh/blog/2026/10/c…
blog.mozilla.org/security/2026/…
php.net
This is the kind of thing that makes me think we’re only at the start of a much bigger cybersecurity reckoning…
A few compromised CA keys can undermine trust across huge parts of the internet…
And as AI makes finding and exploiting weak infrastructure cheaper, I suspect we’re going to uncover a lot more of these buried fragilities
private keys from 8 intermediate CA certs have been compromised (eMudhra)
Happy "Update everything" day to all my pager-carrying friends
emudhra.we-have-a-problem.co…
I find Ray Dalio’s framing much more useful than the usual “AI bubble / no bubble” debate…
Even if AI delivers the productivity gains everyone hopes for, that doesn’t automatically make every investment around it rational…capital can still be misallocated, expectations can still get ahead of reality, and great technology can still produce terrible returns for people who paid the wrong price…
We’ve seen that movie before…the technology can be transformational and the financial cycle around it can still get messy
Of all the recent arguments I’ve heard for why we might be in an AI bubble, this one from @RayDalio alarmed me the most. Much of the justification for the massive capex is based on the idea it will usher in an era of unprecedented productivity. But he says that even if we do see a productivity miracle, all sorts of other things have to happen to ensure there isn’t a crash.
Ray and I went deep on all of the dynamics at play with a potential bubble. I hope you watch and subscribe: youtube.com/watch?v=OAN7gQle…
Wonderful read…
What I found useful is how wide the range still is on something as fundamental as how much revenue all this AI infrastructure actually needs to generate by 2030…
Depending on the model, the hurdle is anywhere from roughly $0.5T to almost $3T a year…
That spread alone tells you how much uncertainty is still hiding underneath all the confidence around AI capex
Side by side, 2030 AI infrastructure revenue hurdles from Goldman Sachs, Bernstein & Cummings, Van Nieuwerburgh – and our own at @ExponentialView.
We explain why our 2030 revenue expectations diverge from consensus here: investmentbrief.ai/p/2030-re…
Been mulling over this a lot, lately…
We spent decades designing friction out of life, and I’m increasingly convinced some of that friction was doing useful work for us…
Walking to a shop, calling someone instead of messaging, fixing something before replacing it, getting a little lost, waiting, planning, hosting people at home… all of these demanded effort, and that effort often created memory, skill, patience and connection…
Maybe a good life needs a little resistance
Reddit really does have everything….
Somewhere on there is a person asking whether their sourdough starter is alive, someone identifying a 17-year-old cable from one blurry photo… and apparently someone quietly documenting Theranos before the rest of the world caught on…
At this point, I’m convinced every major event has a Reddit post from five years earlier that everyone ignored
This may be my favourite AI benchmark yet.. 😄
254 million tokens, 9 hours, a swarm of agents… all to reverse engineer Linux source code that is already publicly available…
A beautiful reminder that AI can now do extraordinarily complicated things, and we humans can still give it completely unnecessary jobs…
The future is here…efficiency may take a little longer
Last night, a swarm of Opus 5.5 agents working for 9 hours and burning 254.2 million output tokens were able to fully reverse engineer and decompile the Linux source code
Full source archive available here kernel.org
Grab it before they take it down
This is absolutely wild…
We mapped the brain of a fruit fly, turned that wiring into something executable, and now it can navigate worlds that never physically existed…
There’s something almost philosophical about that: a tiny biological intelligence, lifted out of nature and dropped into a synthetic universe…
The line between neuroscience, simulation and AI is getting very strange, very quickly
































