@punk4307i
iAccount based inUnited States!
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- Mexico Android App
! X says this location may be affected by a proxy or VPN.
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Based in Mexico, producer covering quantum computing, AI & robotics. Got a tip on future tech? Let’s talk. Bylines: @BeaconLayerHQ
Durango, México
Joined April 2010
- Tweets39.9K
- Following519
- Followers23K
- Likes51.6K
Pinned Tweet
I lost 6.42 BTC overnight.
A little over $400,000 at today’s price.
I noticed it early this morning when I opened Wasabi and the balance immediately looked wrong.
Then I saw the outgoing transactions.
None of them were mine.
What makes this so hard to understand is that this wasn’t Bitcoin sitting on an exchange or in some hot wallet.
My keys were on a Coldcard that had never been connected to the internet and was physically locked away in a safety deposit box.
That was literally the whole reason I used that setup.
No seed in the cloud.
No photo on my phone.
No password manager backup.
No browser wallet.
The BTC had been sitting there untouched for a long time.
Then overnight, several transactions went out within minutes and the wallet was basically emptied.
I spent the next few hours checking addresses, old devices and everything else I could think of, trying to find some obvious mistake on my end.
So far, nothing.
That’s the part that bothers me more than the number itself.
If I’d signed something stupid or fallen for phishing, at least I’d know exactly where I screwed up.
Instead I’m looking at a cold-storage wallet I deliberately made difficult to access, and somehow the coins still moved.
I’m documenting the transactions now and tracing where the BTC went.
Do I expect to get $400k back?
Probably not.
It’s a disgusting amount of money to lose overnight, but I’m not going to spend the next six months staring at a blockchain explorer feeling sorry for myself.
I made the money once.
I’ll make it again.
Founders usually tell you where the company started.
@kenzi_mori got @michaelh_0g to go further back — to where the obsession itself started.
Berlin → Silicon Valley → his dad’s SAP Lab → Web3 → @0G_labs.
That arc is pretty damn good.
“After moving from Berlin to Silicon Valley, I found myself bored at a new school — so I started spending time at my dad’s SAP Lab: fast internet, endless reading, and the beginning of my love for technology.”
Our host @kenzi_mori sits down with @michaelh_0g (@0G_labs) to trace his origin story — from early curiosity and a growing obsession with tech to his path into Web3, and ultimately, the founding of his company.
Sweet
I really recommending reading this.
In summary, a company which does ID verification for in-person interactions (hotels, car rentals, ID verification for alcohol or marijuana, etc) has some how exposed over 153,000,000 drivers licenses for people in the United States and Canada.
It is a catastrophic data breach, probably one of the worse I've ever seen. If you're in the United States and have traveled, gotten a hotel, purchased marijuana or alcohol, there is a high probability you're in this.
Unlike other breaches, this includes a photo of the person (from the license), making verification you've identified the person significantly easier.
This poses a significant threat to celebrities (musicians, YouTubers, streamers, adult entertainers, actors, etc), politicians, lawyers, wealthy people (CEOs, investors, people of public interest), Law Enforcement Officers, etc
Krebs himself, and several other security researchers, have already confirmed they're in the data leak.
tl;dr gah damn dawg this company is going to be sued into oblivion
krebsonsecurity.com/2026/09/…
A lot of work behind the scenes goes into getting conversations like this right.
Really enjoyed helping bring this one together with @sachitakamura and @averyching — a sharp look at why DeFi is becoming such a strong use case for @Aptos.
On the @BeaconLayerHQ Podcast.
“We focused on four core areas: finance, gaming, social, and entertainment — but DeFi on @Aptos has seen the strongest traction.”
@sachitakamura sits down with @averyching to unpack Aptos’ real-world use cases and why DeFi has emerged as the breakout category: the safety of Move, the composability that allows products to plug into larger protocols, and an ecosystem that is now beginning to hit meaningful momentum.
Will be the same distribution as now.
A minority will find meaning through struggle/"work", most from family and/or consumption and some will be unhappy with the whole state of affairs in all cases 😄
me: please do "this"
5.6: I will do "this", not this other thing [that nobody would consider a sensible alternative to "this"]
fascinating tick that it feels the need to say that every turn
the European mind would really not comprehend. US private companies do not need to:
- publish financial statements
- get audits
- declare UBOs
Amusingly, some of the EU rationale is that the USA forces them to do it
Today, @FinCENnews issued a final rule that permanently removes the requirement for U.S. companies and U.S. persons to report beneficial ownership information. FinCEN today also announced that it will delete previously reported information by U.S. persons from the beneficial ownership information database.
it won't be 30 years but this is a good test
My benchmark for whether a technology has made its way to the mainstream is simple:
Is it deployed in German middle school?
Take robots for example:
Not "can the robot fold laundry?" Not "can it do warehouse picking?" Not "can it reason over multimodal inputs?"
Rather:
Can it survive a German middle school on a Tuesday at 10:35am without being destroyed by a 13-year-old, blocked by data privacy, rejected by the municipality, delayed by procurement, immobilized by fire safety protocols, and then forced to wait six months because somebody forgot which office owns the Wi-Fi contract?
ETA: 30 years ✅
legend
I’ve been working towards AGI my whole life, and as we enter this pivotal moment, I’m stepping into a new role as Chair of Google DeepMind & Chief Scientist of Alphabet. This will allow me to focus on long-term strategy, and accelerating scientific breakthroughs, including leaning into my work at Isomorphic to help cure disease.
I’m excited that @koraykv will be stepping up to lead GDM as SVP, alongside @joshwoodward and our exec team. I could not be more excited and confident about our amazing next chapter! 🚀
blog.google/company-news/ins…
Adam Carson retweeted
After 7 years, Aztec’s Ignition mainnet is live.
Yet zero transactions or apps work yet. The chain is deliberately empty – because true protocol-level privacy can’t be rushed.
Here’s how this phased, decentralization-first launch positions Aztec as the leading private L2 on ETH👇
~~ Analysis by @SachiTakamura ~~
What's Actually Running
Think of Ignition like Ethereum's beacon chain from 2020. The governance and consensus infrastructure is operational, but the execution layer remains offline. The team is running what amounts to a live stress test with real money on the line.
Each sequencer staked at least 200K $AZTEC tokens to participate. They're producing blocks, provers are generating validity proofs, and the whole system is settling on Ethereum, just without any transactions.
The goal of running Ignition with real economics for 2-3 months will (hopefully) surface any remaining issues before transactions go live in early 2026, while setting the network up to be decentralized from day one.
The Decentralization Push
In Aztec's eyes, launching an L2 with a centralized sequencer from the get go rarely translates to decentralization down the road.
Centralized sequencers generate $40-150M annually in fees. Once you're locked into those cash flows, decentralization means making transactions slower and more expensive. The tension never resolves.
Instead, @aztecnetwork will launch fully decentralized from day one across three dimensions:
➢ Ownership is decentralized through $AZTEC token holders who control network parameters, fee schedules, and protocol upgrades.
➢ Block Production runs through 617 decentralized sequencer nodes using proof-of-stake. These nodes order transactions and produce blocks. To prevent any single party from gaining control, a small committee of sequencers is randomly selected to validate blocks before they are submitted to Ethereum.
➢ Proving is permissionless from the get-go. Provers generate the zero-knowledge proofs that cryptographically confirm all transactions in a batch are valid. They aggregate blocks and submit a single, final proof to Ethereum for verification, guaranteeing the integrity of the entire rollup.
When transactions go live, Aztec will qualify as a Stage 2 rollup, the highest decentralization tier for L2s. Most chains have pushed boundaries in one direction. Hitting all three pillars simultaneously is rare.
In Aztec's eyes, decentralization isn't optional for privacy. Centralized sequencers would face pressure from governments to install backdoors. Privacy requires cryptography plus decentralization, not one or the other.
What Happens Next
There are two major upcoming events, one technical and one token-related.
On the technical side, Ignition will remain live for 2-3 more months with sequencers producing empty blocks while the team monitors for issues. Early 2026 is when transactions flip on. Users will be able to send payments, deploy smart contracts, and interact with applications. By the end of 2026, block times should drop from the current 36-72 seconds down to 4 seconds, faster than Ethereum's 12-second blocks.
On the token side, the pre-allocation for the $AZTEC token sale is currently live, with the sale beginning December 2nd and running for 4 days. The sale uses @Uniswap's continuous clearing auction mechanism, meaning if you bid early, part of your bid clears at early prices and part clears later. This levels the playing field between early and late participants while letting price discovery happen naturally. When the auction ends, it automatically creates a Uniswap V4 liquidity pool at the final clearing price.
To participate in the sale, you must register prior to December 2nd.
For compliance, Aztec is using @ZKPassport, enabling people to prove cryptographically that they're from allowed jurisdictions and not on sanctions lists without traditional KYC. The sale is open to US retail and nearly every country worldwide, with the exception of sanctioned countries on the standard OFAC list.
The current 500 sequencers already staked $AZTEC tokens they purchased in a whitelisted genesis sale. They're earning rewards in $AZTEC right now. However, all tokens, whether from the genesis sale, the current public auction, or insider allocations, are non-transferable until Token Generation Event (TGE).
There is no set date for when TGE occurs, rather the community votes on it. However, the earliest date it can go live is February 11th, 2026. Once TGE happens, tokens purchased in the public auction unlock 100%.
7 Years in the Making
Overall, Ignition and the $AZTEC token sale demonstrate both the complexity of successfully executing privacy, as well as the extent to which Aztec is going to get this right.
First you have the need for decentralization from the get-go to ensure privacy endures, a feat unaccomplished by countless L2s launched so far. Then you have the tension between privacy and compliance, which the token sale's integration with ZK Passport helps solve.
Regardless of how mainnet goes, and I'm hopeful all goes well, this launch process shines as a testament to diligent design, demonstrating that forces like decentralization, privacy, and compliance can all coexist
Adam Carson retweeted
The Coldcard attack may have been the biggest psychological attack on Bitcoin self-custody in years.
And the possibility that this was state-backed should not be dismissed.
Look at the details.
An attacker who was capable of finding a vulnerability in one of the most respected Bitcoin hardware wallets should also understand basic operational security.
Yet what happened?
No serious attempt at hiding the trail.
No sophisticated onchain privacy.
No attempt to slowly drain funds.
Everything was consolidated into a single address.
Almost like the goal was not just taking coins — but creating maximum visibility, maximum fear, and maximum damage to trust.
Then look at the timing.
A vulnerability like this does not appear overnight. Finding it, validating it, and preparing an exploit likely required months or years of work.
And then it happens during CLARITY.
The timing is almost too perfect.
If you wanted to create panic around self-custody, damage confidence in Bitcoin security practices, and push people back toward custodians and exchanges — this is exactly the type of event you would design.
The execution was unusually loud.
No discretion.
No patience.
No attempt to blend in.
Just maximum outrage.
At the same time, social media algorithms are being flooded with fear. Every feed is filled with people saying self-custody is broken, hardware wallets are unsafe, and "maybe exchanges aren't so bad after all."
And that's the part that matters.
The biggest damage isn't the coins that were stolen.
It's the psychological impact.
Coldcard wasn't marketed as a casual hardware wallet. It was considered the device for the most paranoid Bitcoiners — the people who cared the most about sovereignty, security, and eliminating third-party risk.
A single event like this can change behavior for an entire generation.
If this was just a hack, it was a massive one.
If it was something more coordinated, then history may remember this as one of those moments that changed Bitcoin forever.
The JFK moment.
The 9/11 moment.
Not because of the amount stolen.
Because of the trust that was broken.
I lost 6.42 BTC overnight.
A little over $400,000 at today’s price.
I noticed it early this morning when I opened Wasabi and the balance immediately looked wrong.
Then I saw the outgoing transactions.
None of them were mine.
What makes this so hard to understand is that this wasn’t Bitcoin sitting on an exchange or in some hot wallet.
My keys were on a Coldcard that had never been connected to the internet and was physically locked away in a safety deposit box.
That was literally the whole reason I used that setup.
No seed in the cloud.
No photo on my phone.
No password manager backup.
No browser wallet.
The BTC had been sitting there untouched for a long time.
Then overnight, several transactions went out within minutes and the wallet was basically emptied.
I spent the next few hours checking addresses, old devices and everything else I could think of, trying to find some obvious mistake on my end.
So far, nothing.
That’s the part that bothers me more than the number itself.
If I’d signed something stupid or fallen for phishing, at least I’d know exactly where I screwed up.
Instead I’m looking at a cold-storage wallet I deliberately made difficult to access, and somehow the coins still moved.
I’m documenting the transactions now and tracing where the BTC went.
Do I expect to get $400k back?
Probably not.
It’s a disgusting amount of money to lose overnight, but I’m not going to spend the next six months staring at a blockchain explorer feeling sorry for myself.
I made the money once.
I’ll make it again.
Adam Carson retweeted
Selling crypto to cover expenses hurts: you trigger taxes and lose exposure.
DeFi borrowing fixes both. Instead of selling your ETH, lock it as collateral, borrow USDC instantly onchain, spend like cash, and stay long — no taxable event in the U.S.
And now, do this directly through Coinbase👇
~~ Analysis by @punk0360 ~~
This is an integration I can happily recommend to my family and friends, as @coinbase is one of the most trusted and easy-to-navigate crypto exchanges, while @Morpho is one of the most proven and dependable DeFi lending protocols.
With this integration, you can now borrow against your ETH without leaving the comfort of the Coinbase app. Assuming you already have some ETH holdings on Coinbase, you just:
1. Click on your ETH balance to bring up your Ethereum dashboard.
2. Scroll down to the "Borrow" tab and press "Start."
3. Review the primer info—your Borrow up to amount (based on your ETH deposited to Coinbase), the Variable rate (the fluctuating interest Morpho will charge on your loan), and the Liquidation LTV (the "loan-to-value" point at which your underlying ETH could be liquidated for repayment)—and then press "Continue."
4. Input the amount of USDC you want to borrow, then click "Review loan."
5. Check that your loan details are satisfactory. When ready, press "Borrow now," then "Accept and continue." Your loan will be submitted, though it may take a minute or two to finalize in Coinbase's UI.
That's all it takes to get started!
If you open a loan, navigate to your Coinbase "Cash" tab and in the "Borrow" section you'll see a "Manage Loans" button. Go here for the "Repay" option to pay back the USDC you borrowed over time.
These ETH-backed loans have a flexible term, so you don't have to pay back specific amounts per a specific schedule. Just repay whenever in whatever amounts suit you, though keep a close eye on your loan health to avoid liquidation.
Also, keep in mind that USDC borrowed on Coinbase can't be used for buying crypto on Coinbase, so this particular avenue is meant for cashing out and spending.
As far as DeFi onramps go, this integration is about as simple and safe as it gets. If you or someone you know hasn't gotten around to borrowing against ETH yet, this is certainly a good place to start.
🤝 Paid partnership
Adam Carson retweeted
Last week, Ethereum’s ecosystem (L1 plus rollups) blasted through a new high, briefly hitting 24,000 transactions per second.
From 0.7 TPS in 2015 to regular spikes above 10,000 TPS today on @growthepie_eth, the modular bet is delivering explosive gains after a decade of building.
Welcome to Ethereum’s exponential age.👇
~~ Analysis by @punk0360 ~~
To be sure, the bulk of this current TPS surge is stemming from Lighter, the newer perps L2 whose custom appchain architecture minimizes what data touches Ethereum.
@Lighter_xyz just posts compressed state diffs and proofs to the L1 while keeping its high-frequency order flow offchain. This zk appchain design is unique in the rollups scene today, but more teams will experiment with this model and extend it in new directions.
Beyond this design evolution, Ethereum's roadmap has plenty of ecosystem-wide advances on the way that will help push performance gains. Foremost to mind is PeerDAS, which the Fusaka upgrade will bring to mainnet next month.
PeerDAS will be a powerful upgrade, as it's projected to facilitate around an 8x increase in Ethereum's blob capacity. With improved data availability, rollups are set to march past 1 million in ecosystem TPS in short order.
For instance, @base hit 1,500 TPS in June 2025 with Ethereum's current blob limits. Blob capacity going up 8x makes 10,000+ TPS feasible for the L2 at some point next year.
This math applies to zk appchains like Lighter, too. If Lighter can handle ~45,000 TPS today, it can potentially pass 350,000 TPS in 2026. Of course, there will be impactful project-level advances as well. ZKsync's upcoming Atlas upgrade has the potential to facilitate 15,000+ TPS for ZK Stack L2s. And that's just one stack and one upgrade.
So yes, Ethereum is scaling horizontally, and the prospects here are impressive. But Ethereum also has considerable vertical scaling potential. There are ongoing efforts, like EIP-7938 and "Lean Ethereum," that can help the L1 reach 10,000 TPS in its own right.
With this "all of the above" approach, we can dream big. We can build a new substrate for all the world's commerce and culture. And all of that builder potential is possible precisely because Ethereum is going tall and wide in its scaling.
This is the endgame: many chains spreading out to the horizon in every direction for any need, all anchored around an incredibly secure and robust network that's worthy of powering an entire civilization.
The progress here is clear. Meanwhile, the Ethereum community will continue to create its own destiny, just as it always has. We know the path forward, and nothing can stop us now.
Adam Carson retweeted
For Bitcoin holders, this year’s been a bitter draft — gold blasting to $4.4K/oz with endless all-time highs, while "digital gold" barely scrapes by.
Marketed as a superior store of value, $BTC’s 3x underperformance in a safe-haven surge stings hard.
Is gold’s rally a 70-100 day lead-in to Bitcoin’s boom, or the cycle’s final curtain? Here’s how to decode it.👇
~~ Analysis by @eliasselborg ~~
What's Going on with Gold?
Gold's relentless 2025 performance can be attributed to unprecedented central bank buying, driven by inflation concerns, geopolitical tension, and a fundamental shift in how central banks think about reserves.
Central banks had their second largest Q1 gold purchases on record this year. Poland added 67 tonnes amid the Ukraine conflict. Turkey picked up 19.5 tonnes as its currency weakens. China continues to quietly accumulate amid tensions with the U.S., swapping out U.S. Treasuries, while in Shanghai, gold futures volumes have tripled since early 2024.
Gold is increasingly replacing U.S. Treasuries as the "riskless" asset in global portfolios. With mounting U.S. debt and political dysfunction, central banks are diversifying. Some reports suggest gold has even flipped Treasuries to become the number one central bank reserve asset globally.
Why? Gold doesn't carry counterparty risk and can't be printed or devalued by central bank decisions. In an era where trust in institutions is eroding, that matters.
Still, gold is showing signs of being clearly overbought. Parabolic moves like this rarely end smoothly, which raises the question: what does a gold rally of this magnitude actually signal?
What Have Gold Rallies Meant in the Past?
Similar rallies have signaled different outcomes. Sometimes gold's parabolic moves have preceded major crises. Other times, they've set the stage for broader risk-on rallies, with Bitcoin following months later.
The Bear Case: Late-Cycle Behavior
Gold surges often coincide with late-cycle uncertainty. From 2007 to 2008, gold spiked as the subprime crisis unraveled. In 1999 and 2000, gold shot up ~34% as the dot-com bubble burst and recession followed.
While today is different, there's a parallel level of unease against the backdrop of geopolitical tension and economic uncertainty. Steep climbs tend to end in sharp corrections. Gold experienced this in 2010 and 2011 when it surged 70% before collapsing 45%.
But is this really a late-cycle warning? Gold similarly rallied during 2020's COVID crisis, but that surge led to recovery, not prolonged downturn. Central banks are now accumulating over 1K tonnes per year amid a structural shift away from dollar reserves.
The Bull Case: Gold as a Leading Indicator for Bitcoin
Evidence suggests that when gold breaks out, Bitcoin has followed, usually with a lag of 70-100 days.
The clearest example is 2020. Gold surged to $2,075 amid pandemic uncertainty. About 85 days later, Bitcoin began its climb from $5K to $10K, then exploded 590% to hit $64K by early 2021. A similar situation happened last August, with gold ripping to new all time highs while Bitcoin lagged for about two months before surging come November.
If the historical pattern holds, gold's rally could be setting up Bitcoin's next leg higher. Once gold peaks, capital could flow into Bitcoin as investors shift from defensive positioning to offensive plays.
The key is recognizing that gold moves first in debasement trades, and Bitcoin follows once the narrative crystallizes. While past performance doesn't dictate future results, gold's run is not a death sentence for Bitcoin.
Things to Consider
Whether you believe gold's rally signals late-cycle risk or sets up Bitcoin's next move, it's worth understanding what these assets do in a portfolio.
Gold is a preservation tool that maintains purchasing power. It can't be printed or manipulated by central banks, providing an anchor when other assets fail.
➢ A portfolio with 5% gold and 95% S&P 500 returned 152% since 2018
➢ A portfolio with 5% Bitcoin and 95% S&P 500 returned 199%
➢ At 10% allocations, gold delivered 155% while Bitcoin hit 253%
Gold provides stability during uncertainty. Bitcoin, still growing into this role, behaves with more volatility but significantly outperforms. If your goal is wealth preservation, gold makes sense. If you're willing to stomach volatility for outsized returns, Bitcoin remains the better bet.
So, while Bitcoin holders might feel frustrated watching gold gains, if history repeats itself, that frustration could be short-lived.