On John Henry Newman's feast day recall his account of a university: where "the intellect may safely range and speculate, sure to find its equal in some antagonist activity, and its judge in the tribunal of truth. It is a place where inquiry is pushed forward, and discoveries verified and perfected, and rashness rendered innocuous, and error exposed, by the collision of mind with mind, and knowledge with knowledge." Newman, Historical Sketches.
Paul Yowell retweeted
It still feels unreal. Almost two years since Kim Leadbeater first announced she was going to bring forward her assisted suicide bill, almost two years since we started organising the lawyers' letter to the Observer where serious concerns over the bill were first expressed, and it's finally been defeated.
Doubtless supporters will try again, but the appetite is clearly not there in Parliament, the Senedd, the Scottish Parliament and across the country as a whole for such reckless social change.
Yesterday was a real victory for society's most vulnerable. This bill, under the pretence of alleviating suffering, would have endangered those most at risk of coercion, social pressure and their own dark thoughts because of their race, sex, social standing, disability or mental ill health.
Canada, Oregon, and other jurisdictions show the ineluctable propensity of assisted suicide laws to expand further. I'm certain that the Terminally Ill Adults Bill would have snowballed into a capacious assisted suicide and euthanasia regime in this country as well. It was right for the Commons to think again, to heed the House of Lords' concerns, and to decide not to cross that moral Rubicon.
I'm glad to wake up this morning in a country where the spectre of a state that assists terminally ill people to end their own lives has been banished. But now it's time for us all to commit to the state truly assisting terminally ill people to die with dignity and peace. Excellent, universal palliative care is sorely needed in this country. If advocates of yesterday's reckless bill were to put even half the same effort into campaigning for true dignity in dying, the political pressure to improve palliative care would be unstoppable. It's time for us all to commit to that project.
Brilliant article on what happened after the assisted suicide bill was initially approved by the House of Commons, and some enduring strengths of the British constitution.
The British constitution, a bit like life, sometimes gives you a second chance.
First thoughts on today’s momentous vote in @firstthingsmag: firstthings.com/how-britain-…
Paul Yowell retweeted
Many words, many speeches. But this deeply moving, impassioned, plea to @HouseofCommons from Lancashire MP @AshleyDalton_MP - who has stage 4 incurable breast cancer - was simply outstanding: ‘My days may be numbered, but that doesn't mean that I want this chamber to rush through bad law just so I might have a chance to see it or use it’. Mercifully, @UKParliament heeded her courageous warning not to ‘rush through bad law’. Instead, Government must swiftly respond to calls from both Houses, and the Scottish Parliament, for urgent focus on life enhancing palliative care and comprehensive hospice provision. @andyburnham @YvetteCooperMP @CommonsSpeaker @UKHouseofLords @scotgov
@GordonBrown @ShabanaMahmood @wesstreeting
Watch in full:
By a decisive margin @HouseofCommons has rejected the assisted suicide Bill. Thanks to all those who had the courage of their convictions. Now both Houses of @UKParliament @UKHouseofLords should unite with the devolved administrations and insist on world class palliative care and hospices. To die with dignity we don’t need doctors to kill us. @andyburnham @KemiBadenoch @EdwardJDavey @Nigel_Farage @danny__kruger @timfarron @NazShahBfd @AshleyDalton_MP @ShabanaMahmood @wesstreeting @KanishkaNarayan @MarieRimmer @frankcottrell_b @Rachel_deSouza @RachaelMaskell
Paul Yowell retweeted
Parliament's rejection of the Assisted Dying Bill today brings much relief.
Scenes of disabled people protesting against the Bill outside Parliament were truly heartbreaking. The Bill raised deeply troubling questions about coercion and whether its safeguards could truly protect the most vulnerable amongst us. Had it passed, something very precious in the fabric of our society would have been changed irreversibly, leaving vulnerable people exposed to pressures they should never have to face.
Today, that line was not crossed.
Our response to suffering must be compassion, care and empathy, investment in people, proper resources and a palliative care system that ensures nobody is left without dignity, comfort or hope at the end of life.
We as a society must do more, much more, to help people to live with dignity, to care for them in the best and most humane way possible, and never make them feel that death is the answer to their suffering.
I feel a profound sense of honour to have played my part in today’s vote, helping to ensure that this Bill did not become law and that the most vulnerable among us remain protected from the possibility of coercion and undue pressure.
Paul Yowell retweeted
If there was one speech which swung it, it was this from @AshleyDalton_MP, who has stage 4 cancer and spoke so powerfully about how the bill failed the people it purported to serve:
Paul Yowell retweeted
A huge moment and not just for Britain.
No parliament has debated assisted suicide so thoroughly, forensically and passionately. The result has been a collapse in support as people woke up to the dangers.
Paul Yowell retweeted
I honestly don't see how any responsible MP could look at the following and think "but let's vote this bill through anyway and let's do it in a way that cuts off any Lords scrutiny via the Parliament Acts". It will be a travesty if the Commons passes this bill today.
Paul Yowell retweeted
Basically the Edwards plan to use the Parliament Acts removes the normal parliamentary safeguards.
This is why assisted dying supporters like Louise Haigh have said they don’t support the Parliament Acts plan.
Paul Yowell retweeted
To all MPs whether for, against, unsure or abstaining on the assisted suicide vote on Friday in the Commons, please watch Better Off Dead? @BBCOne @OpenUniversity It’s my documentary explaining why no disability rights organisation supports this unsafe law bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0…
Paul Yowell retweeted
It’s interesting that both times the Commons has voted, the promise has been “Don’t worry, the precise text in front of you won’t become law.”
Replying to @philipmurraylaw
So while Edwards continue to present Friday's vote as an opportunity to allow the Lords simply to finish the job, the reality is quite different. A Commons vote for the Bill is a vote that it becomes law, even in a form that supporters appear to accept as far from perfect.
Important point by Philip Murray on the assisted suicide bill; read the whole thread.
Replying to @philipmurraylaw
So while Edwards continue to present Friday's vote as an opportunity to allow the Lords simply to finish the job, the reality is quite different. A Commons vote for the Bill is a vote that it becomes law, even in a form that supporters appear to accept as far from perfect.
From the Freedom of Speech (Higher Education) Act 2023: “The governing body of a registered higher education provider must take the steps that, having particular regard to the importance of freedom of speech, are reasonably practicable [for] securing freedom of speech within the law …”
Paul Yowell retweeted
The Spanish state failed this rape victim. So it will help her to kill herself instead. There are no depths to this horror. news.sky.com/story/gang-rape…
The administration of euthanasia for 25-year-old Noelia Castillo Ramos took place in Spain on March 26 — an event occurring after she faced immense life challenges since childhood and following nearly two years of a legal battle waged by her parents to preserve her life.
According to Spanish law, to request euthanasia, an individual must be of legal age and be both mentally capable and fully conscious at the time of the request; they must also hold Spanish citizenship or have maintained legal residency for more than 12 months and “be suffering from a serious and incurable disease or a serious, chronic, and disabling condition, as certified by the attending physician.”
On March 24 it was reported that the European Court of Human Rights rejected the interim measures requested by Castillo’s family to halt her euthanasia, bringing an end to a legal battle spanning nearly two years.
The following day, an interview with Castillo aired on the Spanish television network Antena 3 in which she described how she feels: “I have no desire to do anything — not to go out, not to eat, not to do anything at all. ... Sleeping is very difficult for me; furthermore, I suffer from back pain as well as leg pain.”
“I have always felt alone, because I have never felt understood; no one has ever empathized with me, and I have always struggled with interpersonal relationships,” she recounted.
“Even before requesting euthanasia, I viewed my world as very dark; I saw a very dark ending ahead of me. I had no goals, no objectives — nothing at all — and I still have no goals, no objectives,” she acknowledged.
Castillo’s life has been full of many challenges. While under the guardianship of public services following her parents’ separation, she was subjected to multiple sexual assaults.
According to Abogados Cristianos (Christian Lawyers) — the organization representing Castillo’s father in his efforts to prevent his daughter’s euthanasia— at that time, the young woman had been officially recognized as having a 67% disability due to mental illness.
In October 2022, she attempted suicide by throwing herself from a balcony, sustaining injuries that left her in a wheelchair; this increased her disability rating to 74% — a fact that, according to the Christian Lawyers organization, “demonstrates that the underlying issue is psychiatric.”
“This is key: The Constitutional Court itself (Ruling STC 94/2023) makes it clear that euthanasia cannot be administered when the source of suffering is a mental illness and that the state has an obligation to protect these individuals from the risk of suicide,” Christian Lawyers emphasized to ACI Prensa, the Spanish-language sister service of EWTN News.
Although reports have circulated claiming she was left paraplegic, Castillo herself refuted this: “I am not bedridden or anything of the sort; I get out of bed. I shower all by myself. As you have seen, I apply my own makeup and manage my own affairs,” she stated.
According to her own testimony, Castillo had been admitted to psychiatric facilities at least twice previously, and during those stays, she made several suicide attempts. She was discharged in June 2023.
In April 2024, she requested euthanasia in accordance with the procedure established by law, and it was approved for August 2024. This marked the beginning of a legal battle waged by her father, supported by the Christian Lawyers organization.
During the proceedings, they succeeded in halting the procedure and securing recognition of the family members’ right to object to the euthanasia request.
Concurrently, Christian Lawyers filed a criminal complaint against the physician and the lawyer who had initially evaluated Castillo’s request in accordance with the protocol.
The organization alleged that, despite agreeing to authorize the euthanasia, the two “feigned disagreement in order to refer the decision to the Guarantees and Evaluation Commission, thereby ‘forcing’ a supposedly higher level of assurance in the decision-making process” — a point noted by the Supreme Court in a ruling.
In September 2025, Christian Lawyers also filed a complaint against seven members of the guarantees commission for conflict of interest as well as against the former Catalan minister of health, Josep María Argimón, for having appointed them.
Subsequently, in January of this year, the Supreme Court upheld the request for euthanasia — a decision that was appealed to the Constitutional Court, which rejected the appeal in February.
The Christian Lawyers organization also took the case to the European Court of Human Rights, which rejected the request for interim measures without ruling on the merits of the case on March 24.
Following this, it was announced that the euthanasia procedure would be carried out on March 26 at 6 p.m. local time. The procedure lasts approximately 15 minutes and involves the use of three chemical substances. Per Castillo’s decision, her parents were not permitted to be present.
According to Christian Lawyers, “this case exposes the failure of the euthanasia law. It facilitates suicide without the individual having received prior mental health treatment.”
Consequently, the legal organization emphasized that “it is imperative to establish protocols mandating an attempt at psychological and psychiatric treatment before authorizing euthanasia. Without treatment, there is no free decision; there is abandonment.”
Finally, they hold the health authorities of the Catalan regional government responsible: “Before offering death, they must ensure that they have offered every alternative for life. In cases of mental illness, they should be investing in the most advanced psychiatric treatments and in recovery.”
ewtnnews.com/world/europe/ov…


























