Andrew G. Watters (@raellic) header
Andrew G. Watters (@raellic) profile picture

Truth-seeking attorney and part-time inventor/systems integrator. 🔫 enthusiast. Married to @tinausc. Man of science, man of faith.

Redwood City, USA
Joined May 2025
Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)Photo by Andrew G. Watters (@raellic)
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
President Trump Delivers Remarks, Nov. 6, 2026 nitter.cf/i/broadcasts/2WXEnkVgd…
608
1,321
92
5,545
718,524
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH “We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue” Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
THE 15% BAND Look at this chart. 59 races. Senate and governor. States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024. The solid lines are 2024. The dashed lines are 2026. The shaded bands are what moved. One formula fits all of it: Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024 Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024 For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side. The numbers: Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share Governor: ~86% Variation explained: 88% What makes it strange: It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero. The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races. Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853. Why seats flipped: At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped. What this means: Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere. A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out. The numbers raise the question. The ballots can answer it.
1,674
15,068
986
34,493
829,183
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
Stolen Elections / The 85% - 15% Algorithm is Found Across 59 Key Races - the SAME formula was used: Republican 2026 = 0.85 Ă— Trump 2024 Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 Ă— Trump 2024
THE 15% BAND Look at this chart. 59 races. Senate and governor. States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024. The solid lines are 2024. The dashed lines are 2026. The shaded bands are what moved. One formula fits all of it: Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024 Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024 For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side. The numbers: Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share Governor: ~86% Variation explained: 88% What makes it strange: It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero. The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races. Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853. Why seats flipped: At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped. What this means: Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere. A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out. The numbers raise the question. The ballots can answer it.
51
914
36
2,269
25,945
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
Patriots in control.
14,910
19,172
3,489
126,290
9,952,293
Well, I was right that it's the most consequential election in my lifetime, but I was wrong about which direction. After the Democrat blue wave, the America 250 celebration now looks like a funeral-- with the borders reopening under a likely Democrat president in 2028, Western Civilization is going to decline and the entire country is going to become a one-party state like California. Where would we move? Texas just turned blue. I guess that also answers the question of what the longer-term future holds for humanity: the Great Filter is a globalist world government that prohibits or strongly disincentivizes the innovation necessary to make life multi-planetary. With Elon Musk likely in jail, or worse, we won't get any more flying cars, civilian space travel, sight for the blind, thought computing, and all his other innovations. Instead, we will get mediocrity and consensus championed by a Chinese Communist Party-style bureaucracy. Mark my words, now through 2028 is the prolonged death of freedom and the end of the American golden age. And it will end badly, with major cities becoming depressing, dangerous hellscapes like where San Francisco was going (maybe still is). Our only hope for the future will be superintelligence that disrupts the logjam of bureaucracy, but the odds just got a whole lot worse for that to happen in America. If the Democrats try to pause A.I./S.I. development, China will win and the world will suffer as a result. I think I know what the future holds, and it's coming sooner than expected. This also likely means that the era of free speech on the Internet is finished, which doesn't bode well for my raw and uncut takes on various things. This is what people voted for-- comfort over freedom. It's a very sad day in America.
1
143
See anything strange here? Each California statewide office is magically 75/25 in favor of the Democrats, except for Insurance Commissioner where two Democrats are running. Credit to @realJoeHoft for spotting this in Orange County. San Mateo County is more plausible, but even so, this is insane. livevoterturnout.com/ENR/san…
38
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
STAND. FIGHT. DEFEND THE REPUBLIC.
76
453
26
1,891
19,194
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
Friendly reminder to the fraudsters: At President Trump's directive, we're coming for you and bringing you to justice.
15,689
9,385
1,312
57,932
2,982,762
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
I asked Grok what the chances were of 90% of Texas counties flipping from red to blue in 1.5 years were, leaving 6 months for people to start deciding from inauguration day. This was the response. One noventrigintacentillion. That's a 1 (one), followed by 420 zeros. 420 zeros. Even accounting for "muh vote turnout", this cannot be defeated. The number would still dwarf your chances for winning the PowerBall. Wake up, America. You just got roofied, rĂĄped, and had a kidney stolen.
Replying to @grok
@grok Statistically speaking, what are the odds of 90% of the counties in Texas spontaneously and completely flipping from solid republican to solid democrat within a 1.5 year period? Math only. No commentary.
257
2,112
173
5,063
134,780
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
You buying this? Republicans came out to vote like they did in the 2022 primary. Democrats just found 20 MILLION new votes. Sure.
867
4,242
249
15,390
236,772
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
2,848 counties flip to Democrats out of a total of 3,109 counties? This is the most obvious ELECTION FRAUD in history, even challenging the stolen 2020 election. We can't go on like this. I'm tired of people destroying this country and getting away with everything.
1,331
7,061
514
15,418
253,233
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
Nobody believes this. Democrats are even asking questions it's so obvious. 2,848 out of 3,109 counties is beyond unrealistic, especially when you learn that states across the country registered millions of "new voters" without ANY verification of U.S. citizenship, with some counties even having more ballots counted than registered voters.
2,323
15,819
1,095
41,600
819,670
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
Replying to @tetsuoai
It troubles me greatly that we do not yet see any sign of aliens
7,226
1,783
858
31,832
2,843,326
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
A father’s love for his daughter never ends, even when her time here does. There are no words to describe the heartbreak of losing a child or the emptiness that lasts a lifetime. The years may pass, but the love, the memories, and the longing to have her here with us never fade. If you are able, please consider making a donation to support us as we walk to honor Autumn this Saturday. These donations, no matter how small, help fund life-saving research, suicide prevention education, and support for families who know the unimaginable heartbreak of losing someone they love. Autumn will always be my daughter, our heroic archer. She will always be loved and always be a part of everything I do. afspwalks.donordrive.com/tea…
714
6,580
288
51,391
1,076,372
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
The list of the cars burned by Republicans, stores looted by Republicans and streets blocked by Republicans after Tuesday’s midterm election losses.
905
7,410
289
25,320
212,270
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
Did anyone notice that the democrats were so sure of their victories, that they didn’t need weeks of counting in order to declare victory? 🤔
252
824
28
5,222
63,051
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
69,081
30,756
21,145
284,698
72,262,747
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
🇵🇱 BREAKING: Poland Erupts in Massive Protests Poland. Millions of people in the streets. Massive protests are unfolding. Another extraordinary scene from Europe.
315
3,529
181
12,294
301,502
Andrew G. Watters retweeted
🚨🇵🇱Situation in Warsaw, Poland, has reached a boiling point as hundreds of police officers surround the city center, preparing for a possible state of emergency. The latest reports from the ground reveal that increasing numbers of police reinforcements are being brought into Warsaw. On-the-ground reporters say pro-EU Prime Minister Donald Tusk may declare a state of emergency or martial law tonight, starting at midnight. Journalists have obtained verified information about the evacuation of staff from the Prime Minister's Office, a building located right next to the Constitutional Tribunal. Meanwhile, a police vehicle equipped with an LRAD system has been spotted outside the Tribunal, raising questions about the possible planned use of acoustic weapons. EU and Tusk have effectively declared war on Poland. In normal countries, what the Polish prime minister is doing would be considered HIGH TREASON. Full support for the patriotic and Christian people of Poland. May God protect you!
573
6,726
377
15,989
277,741