Top 5 learnings growing The Rundown to 3.5M total active subscribers and 55%+ open rate: 1. Email is its own platform, treat it like YouTube, Instagram, Twitter Super readers (open every email, click ads, and stick around for years) genuinely like email as a medium. We have millions of readers who don’t use social media. Best way to acquire them is through other newsletters, referrals, or being the reason they stop using social media. Barely anyone is building for this audience. I’m more bullish on email than any other platform (long-form YouTube is a close second). 2. The newsletter industry lacks innovation Look at mobile apps, ecom, edtech. Custom quiz onboarding, a landing page for every ad, hundreds of new creatives a day. Meanwhile most newsletters, including some of the biggest in the world, have a basic landing page and standard onboarding. We built an onboarding quiz funnel that, at one point, got us close to negative CAC with hundreds of thousands a month in ad spend. That’s what let us scale aggressively and outbid competitors. With AI coding and platforms like beehiiv, there’s no excuse not to build new experiences for your readers. The opportunity here is wide open :) 3. Newsletter sales is mostly an education problem We still run social partnerships at a significantly higher CPM than our newsletters, yet the newsletters convert better and get way more clicks. A lot of advertisers don’t understand newsletters as they do with influencer marketing, so at scale it becomes an education game. Once advertisers get it, they stay. We’ve been booked out at multiple ads a day for the last 3 years, months in advance. 4. Stay lean, fast, aggressive Other newsletters have built large sales and content teams. I think it’s better to stay small and pay high-quality people to do very good work. Revenue can increase with more employees, but the opportunity cost of not moving fast in the AI era is a long-term net negative. For example, we constantly test new growth experiments and new forms of media. Most don’t work and that’s fine. The point is we can pivot the same day because we're lean. 5. Lastly, don’t listen to people who say email is dead or that you shouldn’t run paid ads. That’s ignorance and lowkey skill issue.
3.5 years in, and The Rundown is approaching the 4M total newsletter subscriber mark 👀 Grateful for the journey so far, so much more to come

Oct 29, 2026 · 2:50 PM UTC

82
3
5
72
15,946
RelevantRecentLikes
What moved the open rate more, better subject lines or pruning inactive readers?
1
1
161
i stopped reading newsletters in my inbox. they go to feednest now and ned, the ai in there, gives me the summary
1
3
172
5% of chatgpt users have a paid account Now think about how many people use agents, compared to how many people use email Even as an AI newsletter covering this topic, we've seen 0 drop in open rates since Muse, Grok Bot, Dots, etc.
4
1
5
732
email being its own platform makes the unsubscribe link the only dislike button that works
59
Wasn't aware of this. I will check it out today. You miight end up having 3.5M and 1 subscribers later on today!
68
The Rundown is proof that email still has so much room to grow
46
very interesting data ty for sharing Rowan
79
super readers is a term i'm stealing
4
Super readers is the right frame. Most small businesses treat their list like a megaphone, then wonder why opens slide. Did the 55% hold as the list scaled, or did you have to prune to keep it there?
6
I'd take readers who open every email over followers who never see my posts
9
email is the one feed no algorithm can nerf
3
Wild that the oldest social network is still the only one where people read all the way to the end.
12
treating email as its own platform makes sense. can you spot the super readers early, or does it take months of opens before you know who they are?
15
"email is its own platform" is so true and so ignored. everyone treats the newsletter as a dump of their tweets. the super readers can tell what's the one thing that moved open rate the most?
11
Treating email as its own platform is the part most people miss. I've been guilty of using it as a dumping ground for whatever I already posted somewhere else. Super readers want something made for them.
16
"treat it like youtube" is the part people skip. most founders treat their list like a place to post announcements
16
Gmail's spam filter is an algorithm too. Deliverability is email's platform risk.
15
A 55% open rate at 3.5M subscribers is wild… what are you putting in those subject lines
17
For people copying #2, was "near-negative CAC" ad spend minus revenue from the quiz itself, or did it include later newsletter revenue? Breaking those out would show whether the quiz funds acquisition up front or whether a new publisher still needs cash to wait for payback.
12
Point one is the one most owners miss. A social following is rented, an email list is owned. Every business that has been flattened by an algorithm change learns that the hard way.
15
open rates have been fake since apple mail privacy in 2021. show me clicks per send
17
Apple Mail privacy protection inflates opens a lot so I'd be more curious what the click rate looks like at that size
32
Did you use the quiz answers to personalize the newsletter too, or just the onboarding?
18
The high open rate is the number I'd want explained. Do you prune inactive subscribers on a schedule, or does it hold without cleaning the list?
21
55% opens on 3.5M is wild. gmail's ai summaries are gonna make that number way harder to keep
24
55% open rate is the kind of number that makes me want to throw my phone across the room and start over. what's the one thing you'd tell someone who thinks email is dead?
23
the email version of a hundred creatives a day is subject line variants on every single send
31
Hitting near-negative CAC on an onboarding quiz at that ad spend is wild.
29
i'd have a quiz funnel up by sunday
1
27