Pinned Tweet
Had a terrific conversation with @Hermitixpodcast on our “Frankenstein” moment with Artificial Intelligence. Article over at @voegelin_view for anyone interested.
voegelinview.com/we-are-all-…
m.youtube.com/watch?v=kdWPGu…
Cover art for my co-edited volume with @HorcherF on the Ritter School!
We introduce their post-war German political thought to English speaking audiences, examining the question of how to pick up the pieces amidst the “ruins” of civilizational collapse.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
This is what reading actually does to you:
“Those of us who have been true readers all our life seldom fully realize the enormous extension of our being which we owe to authors. We realize it best when we talk with an unliterary friend. He may be full of goodness and good sense but he inhabits a tiny world. In it, we should be suffocated. The man who is contented to be only himself, and therefore less a self, is in prison. My own eyes are not enough for me, I will see through those of others. Reality, even seen through the eyes of many, is not enough. I will see what others have invented. Even the eyes of all humanity are not enough. I regret that the brutes cannot write books. … Literary experience heals the wound, without undermining the privilege, of individuality. There are mass emotions which heal the wound; but they destroy the privilege. In them our separate selves are pooled and we sink back into sub-individuality. But in reading great literature I become a thousand men and yet remain myself. Like a night sky in the Greek poem, I see with a myriad eyes, but it is still I who see. Here, as in worship, in love, in moral action, and in knowing, I transcend myself; and am never more myself than when I do.”
— C.S. Lewis, An Experiment in Criticism
If you enjoy our posts, consider becoming a paid subscriber. You'll get:
- Live book club discussions (biweekly)
- Access to our incredible community chat
- Essays to guide you through the Great Books
- All past recordings, essays, and podcasts
- The ability to vote on what we read next
Join here: athenaeumbooks.com/subscribe
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
Historicism is not a byword for the chronological solvent of nihilism. That is a false dichotomy that Leo Strauss had foisted upon his own projected totalization of Heideggerian skepticism. Nor is it Ernst Troeltsch's historical situatedness of the infinite particularity of knowledge and value that undermines any claims to universal and invariant truths. Properly conceived, it is a philosophical, that is, dialectical, reflection upon the historical mediatedness and chronological development of concepts, in which any trans-historical comparison or evaluation becomes possible. In rendering 'Natural Right' ahistorical, Strauss exposes his own historically situated and contingent debt to his particular historical moment, especially as he seeks to respond to Heidegger and the Neo-Kantians (e.g. Troeltsch, Cohen, Cassirer, etc.) with Jacobian and Al-Farabian readings of the line of 'Socratic' thinkers, such as Plato, Machiavelli, Rousseau, Nietzsche etc. This decisive critique of Strauss's historicism that seeks but fails to be trans-historical was developed by Gadamer, Kojève, and Voegelin, adjacent to its more well-known advocates among Quentin Skinner's 'Cambridge School'.
Beyond parody indeed:
“Schnell’s Sept. 18 email statement to The Dartmouth was itself ‘100% AI-written,’ according to a Pangram test.”
Absolutely beyond parody. Dartmouth’s provost has been turning in 70-100-percent AI-written work (in academic journals, newspapers, and even in email correspondence!) since LLMs came out, the student paper reports. He even used AI to write an op-ed about how universities are dealing with AI cheating.
Our book on Ritter and his circle will be out shortly!
Hegel and Aristotle defines the work of Joachim Ritter, too. We prepare a volume on him and his school with Ryan Holston @ryan_holston, to be published by SUNY Press.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
I would defend Hegel's relevance this way: it is not his historicist view that matters, but his concept of "Sittlichkeit" (appr. moral customs). A crucial author in this respect is Joachim Ritter. For him see the volume we coedit with @ryan_holston on the Ritter School.
5/
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
Final reading of the text of our multi-authored book on the German post-WW2 Liberal-Conservative circle, Joachim Ritter's School, co-edited with @ryan_holston, before submitting it to SUNY Press.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
📢Coming soon(ish): Folke Leander's philosophical analysis of the ideas of Paul Elmer More, edited and introduced by Claes G. Ryn and yours truly.
Leander's book amounts to the fullest explication of the philosophy of the New Humanism ever written.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
There will be a chapter on Pieper, as well, in our collective volume on the Münster School, to be published by SUNY Press, coedited by @ryan_holston.
Importantly, one English language edition of his book Leisure was introduced by the late Roger Scruton.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
Replying to @BrandonBloch5 @AnnetteWeinke
We are in the process of publishing a volume on the Münster School with @ryan_holston . So I would be naturally very much interested in this volume, as well.
Here’s an interview I did on “With Good Reason” with host Sarah McConnell, which will air on public radio across the US this weekend. We discuss our “post-constitutional” age and cultural decadence.
withgoodreasonradio.org/
@goodreasonradio
@SUNY
I need to start using the phrase “Luciferian error” more.
“Nietzsche's only error, a properly Luciferian error (in the sense of ‘bringer of light’), was to have chosen violence against the innocent truth of the victim, a truth that Nietzsche himself was the only one to glimpse, in contrast with the blind positivism of all the atheist ethnologists and the Christians themselves. To understand that the twentieth century and its genocides, far from killing Christianity, make its truth all the more dazzling, you just have to read Nietzsche from the proper angle and to situate all the disasters caused by our Dionysian and sacrificial choices along the axis of his writings, the first of those disasters being the madness that was getting ready to swoop down on the thinker himself — a madness every bit as significant as the political madness and historical insanity [as in Nazism] that followed.”
— René Girard
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
Hans-Georg Gadamer on Augustine, Time, and the Structure of Hope
Gadamer revisits one of Augustine's most radical philosophical moves: the refusal to treat time as a sequence of three equal "beings." What makes Augustine's approach unusual is not just his conclusion, it's his method. He didn't treat the problem of time as an abstract puzzle to be solved from a distance. He brought it before God, interrupting his own argument with prayer, asking for help in the very act of thinking. That intimacy between devotion and reasoning wasn't decoration, it was the point.
The insight it produced is deceptively simple. Past and future don't exist as independent realms. They exist only as they press into the present as memory and anticipation held simultaneously in the mind. As Augustine puts it: "We can only think of present signs of the future as being present, and we can only see traces of the past… as being present. Only that can we truly see as 'being.'"
This is what he called the distensio animi, a stretching out of the spirit. Gadamer renders it plainly: that is what we call consciousness.
The German word for the present, Gegenwart, sharpens this further. Embedded in it is gewärtig sein: to be awaiting, to be open. The present is not a fixed point. It is a posture of readiness that leans forward. Time, then, is not a container you move through. It is the structure of consciousness itself. The tension between what is remembered, what is attended to now, and what is anticipated. You do not have past and future. You are the act of holding them together.
From here, Gadamer makes a move that feels almost offhand but lands hard. If consciousness is inherently stretched toward what comes next, then hope isn't a disposition some people choose and others don't. It's built into the architecture of awareness itself. Ernst Bloch was right to foreground it, Gadamer says, because it isn't sentiment, it's structure. "That is why I consider every pessimist a bit insincere; they wouldn't even be here if they didn't have hope."
This isn't a rebuke. It's an observation about what it means to persist. To remain conscious is already to be oriented forward whether you name that orientation hope or not.
Much of modern anxiety comes from treating time as a problem of storage. Holding onto the past accurately, predicting the future correctly. Augustine and Gadamer suggest a different frame. Time is lived through presence: the traces we carry, the signs we read, the openness we maintain toward what is arriving. Consciousness is the act of stretching across all three without collapsing any of them.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
Have you ever contacted a professor to complain after final grades were posted?
7%Yes (I’m going to hell)
93%No (I’m going to heaven)
54 votes • Final results Ryan R. Holston retweeted
Did you know that almost 40% of Virginia college students believe it is acceptable to shout down a campus speaker?
ACTA polling revealed this and other shocking stats about the dire state of free speech at VA public universities.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
This bodes ill. Readers used to outnumber non-readers 2 to 1. Now non-readers outnumber readers 3 to 1.
It's hard to imagine a change of that magnitude not having significant effects.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
The topic of my talk: introducing our volume coedited with @ryan_holston, submitted to SUNY Press.
Heading once again towards Hull, to give my paper and meet friends and new acquaintances at the conf on conservatism, organised by @CenConHull. Thanks for @CRJFear @DrDavidJeffery for organising this.
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
In this month's Reading Wheel Review, we're interacting with The Social Philosophers: Community and Conflict in Western Thought by Robert Nisbet. Read along and consider how history, ideas & institutions influence each other: crcd.net/excerpt-the-social-…
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
324. René Girard and the Myths We Live By Now with Justin Garrison
Listen now: anchor.fm/hermitix
Youtube: youtube.com/watch?v=IaarPRCV…
---
Patreon: patreon.com/hermitix
Ryan R. Holston retweeted
Replying to @shawn_whatley
We publish, with my coeditor, @ryan_holston a collection of essays on the Münster-school. I will be able to deal with Hennis only afterwards.






























