Pinned Tweet
Well, God help me, I'm trying a substack.
If you feel so moved, come check out "Sing of the Man and His Arms."
We're starting light: thoughts on children's television.
open.substack.com/pub/sabrda…
Hearing the voice of Patrick Stewart say "they were only slaves" really anchors the horror of the system Moses lived in.
The Democratic Party is the party of patronage and wholesale vote buying -and has been since Aaron Burr. I think PEG is right that their electoral organization is paradoxical -they win by buying votes, but that eats the resources they need to govern.
sabrdance.substack.com/p/thi…
Replying to @pegobry_en
Ezra keeps going on about this idea of finding a "vision of the Good" for liberalism. Very conservative concern!
He says that the main criticism of Abundance is that it was all about getting people more stuff and that it lacks a vision of the Good.
And, fair enough, I don't disagree with that. I think that's a perennial problem of liberalism, and I don't think Klein would disagree with that either. And maybe he's right that empirically it was the main critique from people who engaged with the book.
But, again, my critique is that Democrats now and in any plausible foreseeable future cannot embrace the many good ideas in his book because their explicit, fundamental strategy is to turn their party, and eventually America, into an ethnic patronage machine, and that's incompatible with the sort of supply-side policies he likes. I would like to see him engage *that* critique.
The philosophical critique is in some ways too easy.
I'd add this is also the reason the GOP never has to be coherent -the nature of the Democrats makes them inherently unstable, which means the GOP can suck wildly and still get back into office whenever some corporate interest finds itself on the wrong side of a vote buying deal.
Part 2 of the essay also discusses why the Federal Funding on non-profits benefits the Democrats, and it was written before the USAID assault really got going, but sotto voce -it's why, long term, it might matter a great deal.
sabrdance.substack.com/p/thi…
I'm reminded of an essay about RoboCop, which argued the movie is like a series of embedded parenthetical statements. It interrupts itself constantly to get to the middle, then completes it thoughts to get back to the ending.
Donald Trump's speech is like RoboCop.
Rewatching JAG, because I can.
Season 1, I can see why this got retooled for Season 2 (and why NBC let it go).
But also, Commander Krennick is a terrible character and I'm glad she didn't make the second Season, and not even Andrea Thompson can make her not awful.
Dying is easier than living alone. Why do you think men have higher successful suicide rates?
Replying to @suzania @joshlayne2don
The smaller martyrdom of potential lifetime celibacy is the cost that is more likely for you to pay. If you are not willing to pay it, you probably would not be willing to be martyred either.
Extremely hot take that I only 30% believe:
A society where different merchant factions brawl at designated locations for supremacy might well be superior to one where the same factions engage in unrestricted legal warfare against each other for years on end.
Replying to @ChrisExpTheNews
It's just interesting that say, early modern Venice had a homicide rate through the roof, but modern Venice, full of agnostics and lapsed Catholics has a super low violence rate. They must have just recently converted...
But since we can see the guy who lost his eye in a bridge brawl, and we can't see the lives ruined and fortunes destroyed and early deaths from stress and suicide arising from modern bureaucratic combat, we judge the older system "worse" and point to the "violence" to prove it.
Someone had suggested this was well written. I was ready to believe them. Then I read it.
If it put half the effort into demonstrating its case it put into pointless invective, it might have been convincing.
pimlicojournal.co.uk/p/again…
Since we're semi-mourning the death of BioWare, let me take the moment to rehash why ME3 was such an uneven game.
1.) The game had legitimately good levels that immersed you in an interstellar war. The sequence of Tuchanka missions felt like something out of Call of Duty.
This caught enough interest to be worth some extended thoughts. Latest substack on the question: what went wrong in EA era BioWare?
nitter.cf/sabrdance/status/21140…
Latest substack. With the closure of BioWare we take a look back at the classic and EA eras of BioWare and why their games ultimately stopped working, why throwing money at the problem made it worse, and how it could have been better.
Yes, yes, very funny. But the Democratic Party has been buying the votes of urban immigrants since 1828 so I don't think "why do immigrants vote for Democrats" is a terribly interesting question with any moral valence to anyone alive today.
It's a good line, but in the Ukraine case I think it cuts both ways. Not that speaks particularly well of the EU or the US.
Wow, imagine if Ireland had a geographically concentrated minority with a blended national identity that connects them to a militarily superior power with a history of worsening famines in their country, and that militarily superior power stoked violent unrest among that minority for years in order to impose partition on a state fleeing the imperial center?
6.b.) they puffed up cereberus-a minor enemy from the first game, because making a new enemy wasn't in the plans (no, the collectors don't count-they are Protheans). The puffed up reaper invulnerability because Sovereign said it in the first game. At every step, they had nada.













