Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Michael Pollan reveals how the introduction of caffeine completely changed human history and consciousness.
"Before caffeine, it was a very different world and a very different consciousness. People were drunk a lot of the time, buzzed almost all of the time because it was safer than water"
"Water was really how you got diseases. If you fermented things, even low alcohol, it killed a lot of the microbes. So people, even kids, drank hard cider for breakfast"
"Tea, chocolate, and coffee all arrive in the same decade in England, and things start to change... no one ate or drank boiling water or hot beverages before"
"Boiling it made it much safer. This gave this incredible public health boost to these places, and then you have the drug that fosters a kind of more linear, rational, focused way of thinking"
"People in the 1600s started writing about it saying, 'Wow, we have this new civil and sober drink that we can use.' And that, I think, makes possible things like the Industrial Revolution"
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The clip repeats the myth that pre-caffeine people were mostly drunk because water was unsafe. Historians and medieval sources show water was commonly drunk from wells/springs while weak ale provided nutrition/calories, not a substitute for bad water.
leslefts.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-gr…
slate.com/human-interest…
fakehistoryhunter.net/2026/02/02/dri…
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Lots of debate this week on whether journals should ban AI in peer review.
We actually tested this in our new preprint, and the results were pretty clear to me.
For context, I've reviewed for most of the big journals and evaluated 1,000 human reviews as an editor. I love to read and evaluate science.
TLDR: From now on I won't do any peer review without AI. For clinical trials, I'd even call human-only review dangerous 🧵
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Breaking News: Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva defeated Flávio Bolsonaro to stay president of Brazil, halting the right’s march in Latin America. Follow live updates. nyti.ms/4iFMwIg
China is on a trajectory to lead the world in science, a development that will reshape technological advancement, innovation and the balance of global power
go.nature.com/4yqb1Oj
"How could a tiny green alga called Chlamydomonas react so rapidly to light?" is a brilliant question
Curiosity often sparks scientific breakthroughs. For 2026 medicine laureate Peter Hegemann, it began with a question: how could a tiny green alga called Chlamydomonas react so rapidly to light?
The Chlamydomonas algae is famous for its ability to swim towards light. When the alga is stirred into a petri dish, the liquid turns a faint green colour. If one side of the dish is illuminated, the green colour moves towards the light source, as the microscopic algae swim towards it. The algae sense the light with an eyespot, a dot on the cell’s surface that contains a light-capturing molecule, retinal.
Hegemann discovered electrical signals in the light-sensitive eyespot that occurred just half a millisecond after illumination, far faster than the response of the human eye. He could only think of one explanation for this ultrafast response: the process must be much simpler than in a human eye. He proposed that a single protein could both detect light and act as an ion channel, an idea initially met with scepticism.
After years of experiments with his colleague Georg Nagel, Hegemann's hypothesis proved to be correct. Together, they discovered proteins that functioned exactly as he had predicted: ion channels that opened in response to light. This breakthrough laid the foundation for optogenetics, a revolutionary technique that allows scientists to control individual nerve cells with light. What began as a question about a microscopic alga ultimately helped transform the field of neuroscience.
Read more about the newly awarded 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: bit.ly/4jNd5w7
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Understanding and modifying starch metabolism to limit yield losses in field-grown cassava (Laure C David , Gabriel Deslandes-Hérold , Carmen Hostettler , et al) doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiag3… @ASPB #PlantSci
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
The first copies of the German edition of "The Traveller" have arrived ("Der Reisende"). Pub date is 30. September. Check out my website for my rather extensive book tour - starting in Berlin on 28. September. Come and celebrate this extraordinary life with me.
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Natural variation in SlGRF10 reveals a role in regulating tomato fruit weight (Julia von Steimker , Markéta Macho , et al) doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiag4… @ASPB #PlantSci
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Big 'omics papers ("atlases" and the like) are typically really boring and scientifically unimpressive (personal opinion ... sue me). But they still get published in prestigious journals nonetheless.
There's a 2024 Nature paper that is a great example. The scientists basically hurled hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of multi-omics analysis at some rats running on treadmills, did some basic analyses, and a Nature editor was somehow persuaded of the science.
Oakes & Pachter took this dataset and actually did some interesting stuff with it. For example, they show that you can predict exercise volume from gene expression signature. Prediction is much cooler than description!
Another remarkable tidbit: they found transcriptomic evidence that one of the rats was infected with a virus, and that this viral infection likely drove a gene expression response that is mistaken in the original paper as a response to exercise. Quite funny really.
The MoTrPAC consortium has been studying the molecular effects of exercise. In a new paper with Conrad Oakes, we take a careful look at their rat dataset, leading to discoveries that highlight the importance of proper bioinformatics & stats. 1/ link.springer.com/article/10…
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Interesting failure of governance at @Nature. Scientists peer review for the scientific journal for free--building up the prestige of the brand--while the Editor-in-Chief & her team get to trash the brand with politicised opinion journalism.
nitter.cf/SashaGusevPosts/status…
Replying to @clairlemon
They have a news team that functions just like a newspaper, with an editorials editor, bureau chiefs, etc. typically with reporting/journalism experience. This team is independent from the scientific peer-review team.
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Unpopular opinion: the age of omics and high throughput data in Biology took us away from very good fundamental questions.
The omics failed to have outsized returns as they were thought to and now we have a generation that’s trained to not think simple.
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
I cannot believe we have got to the point where a ball lightly touching the tips of someone’s hair is being measured by a Snickometer in order to disallow a goal.
The ball’s trajectory and spin were not affected at all.
The offside law was created to stop goal-hanging - it was never intended to be an exact science.
It was never created so that one day artificial intelligence could measure toenails offside and use a snicko to check if someone’s touched a ball.
It was created to stop strikers from man-marking goalkeepers all game.
VAR was meant to be reserved for clear and obvious decisions.
We used to understand that football is better and more entertaining when goals are scored.
That meant that for offsides: in case of doubt, the benefit was given to the attacker while in-line was always onside.
Now we’re using 3D generated AI technology to check toes to the millimetre and extreme microphones to measure minuscule decibels with the aim of disallowing goals and ruining football as a spectacle.
Do they ever ask if we want these changes, do they market test any of it?
What an extra time awaited us for the #Portugal v #Croatia game, unfortunately we will never get to see it thanks to the madness that VAR has descended into.
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Researchers paid $1.06 billion to five academic publishers from 2015-2018 to publish their papers.
Academic publishers sold the same papers back to researchers for $2 billion.

ALT A screenshot of the abstract of a research paper titled "The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges" by Leigh-Ann Butler et al. https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/4/4/778/118070/The-oligopoly-s-shift-to-open-access-How-the-big
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
❗️New alarming data from the Global Report on Food Crises:
🔺Extreme hunger has DOUBLED worldwide over the past decade.
🔺Funding has fallen back to 2016 levels.
🔺9x more people now face the most severe form of food insecurity.
buff.ly/zOrE4nw
@fightfoodcrises @WFP
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
In 1982, conceptual artist Agnes Denes planted and harvested a two-acre field of wheat on a rubble-strewn landfill in Lower Manhattan, located just a few blocks from Wall Street and the World Trade Center, for her incredible project Wheatfield.
This project was titled Wheatfield – A Confrontation.
The site was covered in debris but valued at billions of dollars. Denes cleared it, planted wheat, and maintained the crop for months, ultimately harvesting nearly 1,000 pounds of grain. The project was not symbolic in a loose sense, it was literal agriculture in one of the most financially concentrated places on earth. It forced a direct comparison between land value and land use, between global finance and basic sustenance.
After harvest, the wheat was distributed to over two dozen cities worldwide as part of an exhibition addressing hunger and resource distribution.
Today, the land where the wheat once grew is now part of Battery Park City, real estate that ranks among the most expensive residential property in the United States.
© History Pictures
#archaeohistories
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
DAAD Procope Scholarship Program 2026 in Germany (Funded)
Duration: 2 years
Eligible nationality: All Nationalities
Award country: Germany
Last date: 1 July 2026
Apply Link: brightscholarship.com/daad-p…
#BrightScholarship #FullyFunded #Scholarship #Germany #Students
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Humboldt Research Fellowship 2027 in Germany | Research Opportunity
🔗 Visit: scholarshipscorner.website/h…
Applications are now open for the Humboldt Research Fellowship 2027. This is a great opportunity for international researchers to conduct research in Germany with full financial support and access to top institutions.
Benefits include: Monthly stipend (€3,000–€3,600), travel allowance, health insurance support, free German language course, family allowances, and strong academic support.
📍 Duration: 6–24 months
🌍 Open to applicants from all countries
This fellowship allows you to work with leading researchers and gain international experience in your field.
Credit: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
📌 Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only. Scholarships Corner does not own or manage this opportunity. Please verify details on the official website before applying.
#ScholarshipsCorner #fellowship #ResearchFellowship #studyingermany #scholarship
Agustin Zsögön retweeted
Humboldt Research Fellowship 2027 in Germany | Fully Funded
Applications are now open for the Humboldt Research Fellowship 2027. This is a great opportunity for international researchers to conduct research in Germany with full financial support and access to top institutions.
Benefits include: Monthly stipend (€3,000–€3,600), travel allowance, health insurance support, free German language course, family allowances, and strong academic support.
📍 Duration: 6–24 months
🌍 Open to applicants from all countries
This fellowship allows you to work with leading researchers and gain international experience in your field.
🔗 Visit: scholarshipscorner.website/h…
Credit: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
📌 Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only. Scholarships Corner does not own or manage this opportunity. Please verify details on the official website before applying.
#ScholarshipsCorner #fellowship #ResearchFellowship #studyingermany #scholarship



































