Todd Toler (@solidstateux) header
Todd Toler (@solidstateux) profile picture

Science publisher & Product Management leader. UX geek forever.

Miami, FL
Joined July 2009
Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)Photo by Todd Toler (@solidstateux)
Todd Toler retweeted
Good guide. And the AI labs need to stop making people like Simon (and, to a lesser extent, me) be the ones who explain how to use the modes that they release. Come on, lab folks, you have an AI that can write documentation! And make explainers! And be a tutor! You can do this!
Here's my attempt at explaining what ChatGPT Work can actually do - it's a deeply confusing but extremely powerful tool with a whole lot of useful features that aren't available in regular ChatGPT simonwillison.net/2026/Aug/3…
45
56
3
995
115,373
Todd Toler retweeted
Today, I’m open-sourcing /fuck-cancer, an AI skill that helps patients and caregivers navigate cancer diagnosis and treatment and advocate for themselves and their loved ones. Here’s what patients and caregivers have told me since I shared my mom’s story: “You have to be a huge patient advocate. Ask questions and push for answers, biopsies, and proper testing.” “I need help navigating difficult conversations and advocating for myself.” “The volume of doctors, documents, and insurance paperwork can quickly become overwhelming.” I built the skill to help with these problems. It creates and updates a practical brief with five sections: 1. Patient and care-team information for easy reference during calls 2. What to do next, limited to three specific actions 3. What we know, separating confirmed facts from what remains unclear 4. Medical terms explained in plain English 5. A care log with recent updates and decisions It builds this brief from documents, and context you provide. When research is needed, it uses trusted sources such as the National Cancer Institute and the ClinicalTrials gov API. I use it with ChatGPT/Codex and Claude Code to prepare for conversations and research. It can save the brief locally as a Markdown file or update a shareable Google Doc so the whole family can work from the same information. 📌 Get the free, open-source skill here: github.com/petergyang/fuck-c… If you find it useful, please ⭐ the repo and share it with someone going through this BS disease.
79
186
34
1,599
138,959
I give you: the Curve of AI Adoption The initial "aha" moment climbs quickly to "it can do anything," then at the first sign of trouble plummets into the chasm of garbage. Then comes the long, annoying climb to the plateau of earned competence.
4
4
34
4,029
Given how much I think about this post, it's one of the canonical pieces of the scholar-ready AI movement.
I wrote this post (The Collaborative Exoskeleton of AI Science) a month or so ago and then forgot to publish it! It’s where I build on my “missing mechanisms of the agentic economy” theme and apply it to the infrastructure of AI for science. Would love to know what real working scientists think about this. I hope the AI companies working on science think about it too ;-) open.substack.com/pub/asimov…
77
What finalizing a draft looks like in the year of our lord 2026
4
2
26
2,514
I’m thinking it’s time to rebrand my nickname from Solid State UX to Solid State Evidence. AI don’t care about my hover states and modals, yo. open.substack.com/pub/simons…
2
62
AI doesn’t care about articles. It cares about tasks and chunks. But in those chunks, it often loses the plot—like forgetting a paper was retracted. This is a must read from @aarontay open.substack.com/pub/aaront…
1
2
3
256
Great piece by Katie Parrott on how to keep your writing weird in the age of AI. Be your own goddamn arbiter of texture and give your erudite idiot scribe a style guide!
What does Bible criticism have to teach us about writing with AI? A lot, actually. I wrote all about it for @every 👀 every.to/working-overtime/ho…
60
What does Bible criticism have to teach us about writing with AI? A lot, actually. I wrote all about it for @every 👀 every.to/working-overtime/ho…
1
6
2
20
3,414
Today’s platforms shine for human eyes. Tomorrow’s will shine for LLMs. Scrapeable, readable, reason-ready. The AI Gateway is opening — are we ready to step through? #ScholarlyPublishing #AIGateway
1
2
154
PSA It’s a new era of ergonomics. The primary audience of your thing (product, service, library, …) is now an LLM, not a human. LLMs don’t like to navigate, they like to scrape. LLMs don’t like to see, they like to read. LLMs don’t like to click, they like to curl. Etc etc.
Tired: elaborate docs pages for your product/service/library with fancy color palettes, branding, animations, transitions, dark mode, … Wired: one single docs .md file and a “copy to clipboard” button.
146
470
106
5,598
521,246
Geek out on the history (and future!) of scholarly publishing infrastructure in my first ever podcast appearance. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
1
154
My side hustle as a Miami investigative reporter is officially underway. I contributed Best Manatee Viewing spot to the 2024 BOM. miaminewtimes.com/best-of/20…
1
56
This is a game changer. You can use ChatGPT to transform equations to python functions. Wish I had this 5 years ago.
178
934
186
5,865
2,702,520
One thing I appreciate about Projekt Deal/@ColleenCampbe11 is the absolute focus on speeding the transition. No messing around with anti-hybrid. No trying to change where researchers should publish (e.g. commercial vs non-comm). Just get the hybrids to be fully OA over time.
2
3
1
12
1,977
Please join our all-star April 12 panel for a discussion about "The Nelson Memo... Now What?" featuring Colette Bean (@APSPhysiology), @acochran12733 (@ASCO), @StevenInchcoom1 (@SpringerNature), @b_rockenbach (@yalelibrary) and me as @scholarlykitchn host. customer.sspnet.org/Portal/i…
8
14
2,016
MDPI news: "The second largest journal in the world just lost its impact factor."
Ok this is big. Web of Science just removed the MDPI flagship journal IJERPH from their lists. This means IJERPH has no more an Impact Factor. Why is this big? What are the implications? 🧵
3
6
1,742
"it's still the gold standard. But it is a not easy-to-use tool. It's clunky. And as a result, we've allowed some ankle biters to come in around the edges." Does Clarivate see Elsevier's Scopus as an "ankle biter"? Or what else would this be referring to? seekingalpha.com/article/458…
2
1
1
4
2,210